Comparing two surgical methods for shoulder dislocation treatment
Official title: Latarjet vs Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction for Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability With Glenoid Bone Loss: a Prospective Multi-centre Randomized Trial
Run by Nova Scotia Health Authority · NCT05658289 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing which of two shoulder surgeries, the Latarjet procedure or Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction, works better for people with significant bone loss after multiple dislocations.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 16 Years to 40 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 68 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Nova Scotia Health Authority Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Halifax, Nova Scotia) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 24, 2023 |
| Main results expected | January 2026 |
| Study ends | December 2026 |
| Registry record updated | August 22, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT05658289 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are individuals who have experienced anterior shoulder dislocations and have significant glenoid bone loss as indicated by imaging.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with posterior or multidirectional shoulder instability, massive rotator cuff tears, or those unable to provide informed consent may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial compares the effectiveness of the Latarjet procedure and Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction (AGR) in treating anterior shoulder dislocations with significant bone loss. Both surgical techniques aim to reduce the risk of recurrent dislocations and improve patient outcomes, including pain relief and functional recovery. The study involves patients who have experienced one or more shoulder dislocations and have a pre-operative CT scan showing over 20% bone loss. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the Latarjet or AGR intervention.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide patients with a more effective surgical option for preventing recurrent shoulder dislocations.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown success with both the Latarjet and AGR approaches, but this trial aims to directly compare their outcomes in a controlled setting.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with one or more instances of anterior shoulder dislocation; pre-operative CT scan illustrating \>20% bone loss. Exclusion Criteria: * posterior shoulder instability; multidirectional shoulder instability; massive rotator cuff teats (MRI proven); history of substance abuse, patients unable to provide informed consent, patients refusing randomization.
Where it's running
-
Nova Scotia Health QEII Halifax Infirmary
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Ivan Wong, MD — Nova Scotia Health Authority, Orthopaedic Surgeon
- Study coordinator: Ivan Wong, MD
- Email: research@drivanwong.com
- Phone: 9024737626
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Perfusion Index as a Predictor of Spinal Anesthesia–Induced Hypotension in Day-Case Knee Arthroscopy
This study looks to see if a baseline perfusion index can predict low blood pressure after spinal anesthesia in healthy adults having knee arthroscopy.
-
Sling vs Dynamic Shoulder Brace After Shoulder Stabilization
This pilot randomized trial tests whether a dynamic shoulder orthosis helps people recover faster after arthroscopic stabilization for anterior shoulder instability compared with a standard sling.
-
Two anesthesia methods to keep the joint clear during shoulder arthroscopy
This trial tests whether inhaled sevoflurane vs. total intravenous anesthesia with propofol affects how well surgeons can see inside the shoulder during rotator cuff repair.
-
All-on-6 upper jaw implants placed with stackable guided surgery and immediate loading
This study will test whether a fully digital stackable guided surgery workflow with immediate loading works well for adults needing full-arch upper jaw (All-on-6) implants.
-
Guided Equator overdentures for the lower jaw
This project tests whether fully guided computer-assisted implant placement with Equator attachments gives reliable implant survival and less bone loss for adults with a completely edentulous lower jaw.
-
How three prosthetic methods affect bone levels around dental implants
This trial will test whether three different prosthetic approaches for posterior dental implants change marginal bone levels around the implant over one year in adults eligible for Lance implants.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.