Comparing stress echocardiography and CT coronary angiography for chronic coronary syndrome
Official title: Stress Echocardiography With Carotid Ultrasound vs Routine CT Coronary Angiography in Suspected Chronic Coronary Syndrome for the Detection of Obstructive Coronary Disease and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes.
Run by London North West Healthcare NHS Trust · NCT06185530 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether a combination of stress echocardiography and carotid ultrasound works better than regular CT scans for diagnosing heart problems in adults with chronic coronary syndrome.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 2000 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | London North West Healthcare NHS Trust Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Harrow, Middx) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 18, 2023 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2026 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2031 |
| Registry record updated | November 21, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06185530 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are adults over 18 years old who have symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease and require further imaging evaluation.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with a known history of obstructive coronary artery disease or those requiring urgent treatment for acute coronary syndrome may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of stress echocardiography combined with carotid ultrasound compared to routine CT coronary angiography in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. The study will involve patients over 18 years old who are suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD) and require further imaging investigations. By assessing the severity of coronary disease through these non-invasive tests, the trial seeks to determine which method provides better diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved diagnostic strategies for patients with chronic coronary syndrome, potentially reducing the need for invasive procedures.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown varying success with similar non-invasive imaging approaches, but this specific comparison of stress echocardiography and CTCA is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age \> 18 years old 2. Patients referred to RACPC and judged by the reviewer to require a further imaging investigation, either SE or CTCA, to evaluate a suspected diagnosis of CAD 3. AND 1. Have a PTP score ≥ 5%, as calculated using ESC guidelines OR 2. Have clinical history in keeping with 'typical' angina symptoms, as judged by the investigator, in patients with a PTP score \<5% - With 'typical' symptoms, as per ESC guidelines, being all three of the following i) Constricting symptoms in the front of the chest or in the neck, jaw, shoulder or arm ii) Precipitated by physical exertion iii) Relieved by rest or nitrates within 5 minutes 4. Able to give informed consent to participate in the study and its follow up Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with diagnosed ACS that require urgent or emergency treatment or hospitalisation for inpatient investigations. 2. Known history of obstructive CAD (Previous MI, PCI or CABG) or previous invasive angiography with evidence of ≥ 50% stenosis in any epicardial vessel. 3. Patients who have undergone invasive or non-invasive, functional or anatomical (Including CAC score) testing for detection of CAD within the previous 1 year of clinical assessment. 4. Documented allergy to iodinated contrast or documented allergy to both ultrasound contrasts used at LNWH Trust; Luminity® (Perflutren) and SonoVue® (Sulphur Hexafluoride) or the constitutes 5. Contraindications to undergoing CTCA, including but not limited to; * eGFR \< 40 ml/min * Contraindications to beta-blockers including but not limited to, documented allergy or significant airways disease in the judgement of the investigator. * Exceeding CT scanner weight tolerance 6. Contraindications to undergoing SE, including but not limited to; * Known cardiomyopathic process (Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM)) with resting gradient \> 50mmHg or severe valvular lesion * Severe uncontrolled hypertension (≥180/100mmHg) 7. Known pregnancy 8. Unable to provide informed consent
Where it's running
-
London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust
Harrow, Middx, United Kingdom Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Prof Roxy Senior — LNWH Trust
- Study coordinator: Emma Howard
- Email: emma.howard16@nhs.net
- Phone: 0208 869 2548
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Aspirin 50 mg vs 100 mg with a P2Y12 inhibitor after PCI
This trial tests whether a 50 mg daily aspirin dose, when used with a P2Y12 inhibitor after PCI, works as well as 100 mg with similar safety for people staying on DAPT for 12 months.
-
Can CZT-SPECT/CT quantify myocardial tracer uptake to match PET measurements in coronary artery disease?
This study tests whether CZT-SPECT/CT can quantify heart blood flow at rest and stress and see if the results align with PET measurements for people with coronary artery disease.
-
AI-driven Medipixel fractional flow reserve to guide PCI
This test checks whether an AI-based, angiography-derived Medipixel FFR method can guide PCI as safely and effectively as standard invasive pressure-wire FFR in adults with coronary artery disease.
-
Microplastics and nanoplastics in people with chronic coronary syndromes
This study will test whether tiny plastic particles (micro- and nanoplastics) can be detected in the coronary blood of adults with suspected or known chronic coronary syndromes who are having coronary CT and invasive angiography.
-
Freesolve resorbable magnesium scaffold vs. Xience stent for up to two new heart artery lesions
This trial tests whether the Freesolve resorbable magnesium scaffold works as well as the Xience drug-eluting stent for treating up to two new coronary artery lesions in adults.
-
Identifying biomarkers for high-risk coronary plaques
This study is trying to find new blood markers that can help predict dangerous heart plaque in patients with chronic heart issues or certain types of heart attacks.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.