Comparing high-flow tracheal oxygen and T-piece for breathing trials
Official title: Comparison of Physiological Effects of Two Types of High-Flow Tracheal Oxygen Versus T-Piece During Spontaneous Breathing Trials in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
Run by Capital Medical University · NCT06816706 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether a new type of high-flow oxygen or a standard T-piece helps patients who are coming off mechanical ventilation breathe better during trials.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 20 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Capital Medical University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Beijing, Beijing Municipality) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | November 30, 2025 |
| Study ends | December 30, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | March 21, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06816706 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults who have been on mechanical ventilation for over 24 hours and are deemed ready for spontaneous breathing trials.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who are under 18 years old, pregnant, or have significant hemodynamic or respiratory instability may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study evaluates the physiological effects of two types of high-flow tracheal oxygen compared to a T-piece during spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) in patients who have been mechanically ventilated. The researchers have developed a modified high-flow tracheal oxygen tube designed to enhance expiratory resistance and airway pressure, potentially improving the effectiveness of SBTs. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either standard or modified high-flow tracheal oxygen or a T-piece, with key physiological parameters being measured throughout the trial. The goal is to determine which method provides the best support for patients transitioning from mechanical ventilation.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could improve the weaning process from mechanical ventilation, leading to better patient outcomes and reduced extubation failure rates.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown promising results with high-flow nasal oxygen, but the specific approach of modified high-flow tracheal oxygen is novel and has not been extensively tested.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours 2. Considered by the physicians for the readiness to wean and ready for spontaneous breathing trials Exclusion Criteria: 1. Age younger than 18 years old 2. Pregnancy 3. Hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure \<60 mmHg, heart rate \>140 or \<60 bpm) 4. Respiratory and oxygenation instability (respiratory rate \> 35bpm or oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry \<90%) 5. Neuromuscular diseases or phrenic nerve injury 6. Recent trauma or surgery to the trachea, esophagus, neck, chest, or stomach 7. Pneumothorax or placement of a chest drainage 8. Contraindication to electrical impedance tomography (EIT) (implantable defibrillator) 9. Anticipating withdrawal of life support
Where it's running
-
Beijing Shijitan Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Jian-Xin Zhou, MD, PhD — Capital Medical University
- Study coordinator: Jian-Xin Zhou, MD, PhD
- Email: zhoujx.cn@icloud.com
- Phone: 8610 6392 6666
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Computed inspiratory muscle pressure to monitor inspiratory effort during pressure-targeted assist/control ventilation
This study tests a noninvasive computed pressure method (cPmus) to see if it matches the traditional esophageal pressure method for measuring inspiratory effort in adults on pressure-targeted ventilation with spontaneous breathing.
-
Noninvasive estimate of inspiratory effort to monitor pressure support ventilation
This study tests whether a noninvasive computed inspiratory muscle pressure (cPmus) can match the traditional esophageal pressure method for adults on pressure support ventilation.
-
ICU rehabilitation for adults on invasive mechanical ventilation
This project will look at rehabilitation approaches used in ICUs worldwide to see if they relate to outcomes for adults who have been on invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours.
-
Pulse Wave vs Saline Bolus EIT to measure lung perfusion in ARDS
This study tests whether pulse wave EIT or saline bolus EIT can best show lung blood flow in ARDS patients on mechanical ventilation.
-
Driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP vs standard PEEP during upper abdominal surgery
In this randomized trial, adults at higher risk of breathing problems after upper abdominal surgery will try a personalized PEEP level based on the lowest driving pressure and compare it to a fixed PEEP of 5 cmH2O to see if it lowers postoperative lung complications.
-
Inspiratory Effort and Dyspnea During Assisted Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults
This study tests how different patient breathing efforts relate to breathlessness in adults on assisted mechanical ventilation.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.