Comparing early and delayed bathing for orthopedic surgical wounds
Official title: Early Versus Delayed Bathing of Orthopaedic Surgical Wounds: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
Run by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York · NCT06014411 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether letting patients bathe early or waiting longer after orthopedic surgery for fractures affects their satisfaction and the risk of infections.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 56 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Hospital for Special Surgery, New York Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (New York, New York) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 29, 2024 |
| Main results expected | December 2026 |
| Study ends | December 2026 |
| Registry record updated | March 30, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06014411 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults over 18 years old with isolated acute fractures of the upper or lower extremities requiring surgical intervention.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with multiple fractures, underlying health conditions like diabetes or immune compromise, or those with complicated wounds may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial evaluates the effects of early versus delayed bathing on orthopedic surgical wounds in patients undergoing surgery for fractures. Participants will be randomly assigned to either begin early normal bathing with uncovered wounds or follow the traditional approach of delayed bathing with covered wounds. The study aims to assess patient satisfaction and monitor for any post-operative infections or inflammation. Follow-up assessments will occur at two, six, and twelve weeks post-surgery to gather data on these outcomes.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could improve patient satisfaction and reduce the risk of post-operative infections for those undergoing orthopedic surgery.
How similar studies have gone: While the specific approach of this study may be novel, similar studies have shown that patient satisfaction can be influenced by post-operative care practices.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients over 18 years of age * Patient who are not pregnant * Isolated acute fractures of the upper or lower extremities (humerus, radius, ulna, femur, tibia, or fibula) * Diagnosis of a fracture meeting indication for operative intervention * Any fracture not requiring a splint for post-operative management * Non-complicated wounds (non-traumatic wounds, closed injuries, fractures not requiring external fixation, and acute fracture surgery) Exclusion Criteria: * Fractures associated with presumed infection * Patients with multiple fractures * Fractures in patients with underlying associated immune compromise * Fractures in patients with underlying peripheral vascular disease * Use of VAC * Surgery performed through previous surgical wound * Patient homeless * Fractures in patients with underlying diabetes mellitus * Complicated wounds (traumatic wounds, need for post-op wound care, open injuries, need for external fixation)
Where it's running
-
NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center
New York, New York, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: William M Ricci, MD — Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
- Study coordinator: William M Ricci, MD
- Email: ricciw@hss.edu
- Phone: 212-606-1026
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparing saline irrigation and povidone-iodine for preventing infections in emergency surgeries
This study is testing whether using saline irrigation or a povidone-iodine solution before closing surgical incisions can better prevent infections in patients having emergency surgeries.
-
Using a synthetic fiber matrix to improve healing of surgical wounds from skin cancer removal
This study is testing if a special synthetic material can help patients heal faster after having skin cancer surgery.
-
SupraSDRM vs standard dressing for full-thickness wounds requiring grafting
This study tests whether SupraSDRM® helps healing faster and makes skin grafting possible sooner in adults with full-thickness wounds compared to standard wound dressings.
-
Comparing 7-day and 14-day wound dressings for revision hip and knee surgeries
This study is testing whether using a wound dressing for 7 days or 14 days helps people heal better after hip and knee revision surgeries.
-
Evaluating pain pathways and nerve regeneration in keratoconus patients after corneal crosslinking
This study is testing how corneal crosslinking affects pain and nerve healing in people with keratoconus to see how their pain changes over time.
-
Using Oasis ECM to treat donor site wounds
This study is testing if a new treatment called Oasis ECM can help heal donor site wounds better than regular wound care for people over 16 in the UK.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.