Comparing 7-day and 14-day wound dressings for revision hip and knee surgeries
Official title: Comparison of Surgical Wound Healing and Complications Following Revision Hip and Knee Replacements, Utilising a 7-day Versus 14-day Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) Dressing. A Randomised Controlled Trial.
Run by Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District NHS Trust · NCT05389410 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether using a wound dressing for 7 days or 14 days helps people heal better after hip and knee revision surgeries.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 164 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District NHS Trust Government |
| Locations | 1 site (Oswestry, Shropshire) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 14, 2024 |
| Main results expected | February 14, 2026 |
| Study ends | February 14, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | March 25, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT05389410 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults over 18 years old requiring aseptic revision hip or knee surgery.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with infections or contraindications to NPWT dressings will not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of two different durations of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) dressings in patients undergoing revision hip and knee surgeries. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to receive either a 7-day or a 14-day NPWT dressing treatment. The study will include a total of 164 patients, with 82 in each surgical cohort, to evaluate which duration is more effective in promoting wound healing. The trial is conducted at a single site, ensuring close monitoring and follow-up of all participants.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could optimize wound healing protocols, potentially reducing complications and improving recovery times for patients undergoing revision surgeries.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown benefits of NPWT in wound healing, but this specific comparison of treatment durations is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Subjects must be over the age of 18 years. * Participants undergoing aseptic revision hip or aseptic revision knee surgery procedure (a single stage revision procedure). * Participants must be willing and be able to make all the required study visits to be seen by the research team at the Outpatients department at RJAH. * Participants must be able to follow instructions. Exclusion Criteria: * Revisions for infection, where the nature of the infection has a significant influence on the wound healing, discharge, and length of stay. * Subjects with a history of poor compliance with medical treatment. * Subjects with contraindications (as per the PICO Instructions for use) or hypersensitivity to the use of the NPWT PICO dressing product or its components e.g.: silicone adhesives, polyurethane films, acrylic adhesives, polyethylene fabrics and super- absorbent powders (polyacrylates) contained within the dressing.
Where it's running
-
Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Oswestry, Shropshire, United Kingdom Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Sudheer L Karlakki — The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital Foundation Trust
- Study coordinator: Julie Steen, BSc. (Hons)
- Email: julie.steen@nhs.net
- Phone: 01691404210
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Using a synthetic fiber matrix to improve healing of surgical wounds from skin cancer removal
This study is testing if a special synthetic material can help patients heal faster after having skin cancer surgery.
-
SupraSDRM vs standard dressing for full-thickness wounds requiring grafting
This study tests whether SupraSDRM® helps healing faster and makes skin grafting possible sooner in adults with full-thickness wounds compared to standard wound dressings.
-
Comparing early and delayed bathing for orthopedic surgical wounds
This study tests whether letting patients bathe early or waiting longer after orthopedic surgery for fractures affects their satisfaction and the risk of infections.
-
Comparing saline irrigation and povidone-iodine for preventing infections in emergency surgeries
This study is testing whether using saline irrigation or a povidone-iodine solution before closing surgical incisions can better prevent infections in patients having emergency surgeries.
-
Evaluating pain pathways and nerve regeneration in keratoconus patients after corneal crosslinking
This study is testing how corneal crosslinking affects pain and nerve healing in people with keratoconus to see how their pain changes over time.
-
Using Oasis ECM to treat donor site wounds
This study is testing if a new treatment called Oasis ECM can help heal donor site wounds better than regular wound care for people over 16 in the UK.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.