Comparing digital and paper methods for assessing hip surgery outcomes
Official title: Compliance al Rilevamento PROMs Mediante Supporto Digitale e Correlazione Rispetto al Rilevamento PROMs Ambulatoriale Standard Nella Protesica d'Anca
Run by Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · NCT04749511 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether using digital questionnaires on smartphones is better than paper forms for collecting feedback from patients after hip surgery.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 78 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 50 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Bologna, Italia) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 30, 2020 |
| Main results expected | March 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | March 1, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | May 22, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT04749511 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates include adults aged 18-78 with coxarthrosis who are scheduled for hip arthroplasty and have access to digital devices.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with significant cognitive impairments, psychiatric conditions, or those lacking access to digital devices may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study compares two methods for detecting patient-reported outcomes after hip prosthetic surgery: traditional paper questionnaires and digital questionnaires administered via Google Forms. Patients will complete the WOMAC Score questionnaire both in-person during outpatient visits and digitally on their smartphones. The study aims to evaluate compliance, satisfaction, and differences in outcomes between the two methods over follow-up periods of 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery. The goal is to determine the validity and effectiveness of digital PROMs detection in improving patient engagement and data collection.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could enhance the accuracy and efficiency of outcome assessments for patients undergoing hip prosthetic surgery.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown promising results using digital methods for patient-reported outcomes, indicating potential for success in this approach.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * patients with coxarthrosis with indication of hip arthroplasty * males and females aged 18-78 and with a Barthel scale score ≥ 91 * patients in possession of private digital electronic support (smartphone, tablet or PC) Exclusion criteria: * patients with a Barthel scale score ≤ 90 * patients with psychiatric pathologies, a history of drug and alcohol abuse * patients not in possession of private digital electronic support
Where it's running
-
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, Italia, Italy Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Cesare Stagni, Dr
- Email: cesare.stagni@ior.it
- Phone: 00393473910599
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Archive of Custom-Made Guides for Orthopedic Surgery
Researchers are testing a digital archive to store and track patient-specific cutting guides used in orthopedic surgeries for people with bone deformities.
-
Use of reconstructive microsurgery to treat lymphedema
This study tests whether reconstructive microsurgery, with or without the help of indocyanine green imaging, can help people with lymphedema feel and function better by improving lymphatic drainage.
-
ACL reconstruction using the Over-The-Top technique with either metal staples or soft anchors
This study tests whether using a suture-based fixation (soft anchors) during OTT ACL reconstruction works as well as metal staples for graft stability in adults aged 18–50.
-
Biomarkers in circulating vesicles for Ewing sarcoma
Researchers will test blood samples from people with Ewing sarcoma to see if circulating biomarkers in extracellular vesicles can help validate new therapies.
-
Differences in Outcomes After Allograft vs Autograft in Revision ACL Repair
This study looks at whether using donor tissue (allograft) versus the patient’s own tissue (autograft) in revision ACL surgery leads to different results.
-
Hip arthroplasty with a short cementless stem using a direct anterior approach
This study tests whether a short, cementless hip stem implanted through a minimally invasive direct anterior approach works well in adults with hip arthritis.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.