Comparing airway management techniques for cardiac arrest
Official title: First Responder Airway & Compression Rate Trial (FACT Study)
Run by University of Washington · NCT05969028 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing which breathing method, Bag Valve Mask or i-gel, helps people who have a sudden cardiac arrest survive better when used by emergency responders.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 4200 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Washington Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Seattle, Washington) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 7, 2024 |
| Main results expected | December 2028 |
| Study ends | March 2029 |
| Registry record updated | June 13, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT05969028 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults suffering from out-of-hospital non-traumatic cardiac arrest in Seattle and greater King County.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who have advanced life support initiated by paramedics, have a do-not-resuscitate order, or belong to protected populations will not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The First Responder Airway & Compression Rate Trial (FACT) focuses on evaluating basic life support treatments administered by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) for patients experiencing sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (SCA). This randomized controlled trial compares two rescue breathing methods—Bag Valve Mask (BVM) and i-gel—while also assessing the effectiveness of chest compressions at a rate of 100-120 compressions per minute. Both methods are standard care practices, and the study aims to determine which approach leads to better survival rates upon hospital discharge. The trial is conducted in Seattle and greater King County, involving EMS personnel in real-life emergency situations.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could improve survival rates for patients experiencing cardiac arrest by identifying the most effective airway management technique.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown success with similar approaches in evaluating CPR techniques, but this specific comparison of BVM and i-gel is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults suffering out-of-hospital non-traumatic SCA in Seattle and greater King County in whom resuscitation will be attempted by first responding EMS personnel. Exclusion Criteria: * if advanced paramedic providers are first on-scene and have already initiated advanced life support (ALS) procedures, * a written advance directive (do not attempt resuscitation orders), * traumatic arrest (blunt, penetrating, burn), * known prisoner, * known pregnancy, * other protected populations (pediatrics), * pre-existing tracheostomy, * recipients of mechanical ventilator support, or * presence of an "opt out" bracelet to not be enrolled in clinical trials.
Where it's running
-
King County EMS
Seattle, Washington, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Thomas Rea, MD — University of Washington
- Study coordinator: Jenny B Shin
- Email: jennys2@uw.edu
- Phone: 206-263-8586
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Minimal Sedation After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
This study tests whether stopping continuous sedation right after return of circulation is as safe as keeping patients sedated in the early hours after OHCA.
-
Drone delivery of AEDs to bystanders for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
This project will test whether drones can deliver AEDs quickly to bystanders helping someone who has a cardiac arrest outside a hospital.
-
Pre-hospital wearable cooling after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
This pilot test tries a battery-free CarbonCool® cooling vest applied by paramedics to adults who regain a pulse after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest but remain unconscious to see if early cooling is feasible and safe.
-
Early double sequential defibrillation for cardiac arrest outside the hospital
We test whether using two defibrillators in quick succession after the first failed shock helps adults with out‑of‑hospital cardiac arrest and a shockable rhythm survive more often than continuing standard single shocks.
-
Prehospital access to extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Prague
This study is testing if a special emergency treatment called prehospital extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) can help people who have a cardiac arrest outside of the hospital survive better and have better brain function compared to those who only get treatment in the hospital.
-
Initial double sequential defibrillation for out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation
This trial will test whether using two defibrillators to give double sequential shocks first improves survival for adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and a shockable rhythm.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.