Bioflx crowns vs. celluloid strip crowns for front baby teeth
Official title: Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Bioflx and Celluloid Strip Crowns in Restoring Primary Anterior Teeth
Run by Tanta University · NCT07883187 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether prefabricated Bioflx crowns perform as well as conventional Celluloid strip crowns for restoring badly decayed or injured front baby teeth in young children.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 3 Years to 5 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 40 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Tanta University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Tanta) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 9, 2025 |
| Main results expected | November 2026 |
| Study ends | December 2026 |
| Registry record updated | October 22, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07883187 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Healthy children aged 3-5 who are cooperative and have bilateral anterior primary teeth with multi-surface caries requiring full coronal restoration and sufficient root structure.
✕Probably not a fit
Children with non-restorable teeth, single-surface restorations, or poor cooperation may not benefit from this comparison.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
In this randomized study, 40 children aged 3 to 5 with bilateral front primary teeth needing full coronal restoration receive a Bioflx crown on one tooth and a Celluloid strip crown on the opposite tooth. Outcomes are measured at 3, 6, and 9 months using USPHS criteria for marginal integrity, color match, restoration integrity, and proximal contacts, along with plaque and gingival indices. The aim is to compare clinical performance and durability between the two crown types in a pediatric population. Results will inform choices for restoring primary anterior teeth in young, cooperative children.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If Bioflx crowns perform at least as well as strip crowns, children may benefit from a faster or more durable restoration option for primary front teeth.
How similar studies have gone: Previous clinical work in similar pediatric crown comparisons has shown variable success; this study provides direct comparative data for Bioflx crowns in primary dentition.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Healthy children aged 3-5 years with cooperative behavior (Frankl's behavior rating scale 3-4). * Bilateral anterior primary teeth affected by multi-surface caries requiring full coronal restoration. * At least two-thirds of the root structure is present, and adequate coronal tooth structure to retain the crown. Exclusion Criteria: * Non-restorable teeth * Teeth with single-surface restorations. * Previous full-coverage restoration or large unsuccessful restoration on the target tooth. * Children with oral parafunctional habits (e.g., thumb sucking, bruxism). * Advanced physiologic root resorption (\>1/3).
Where it's running
-
faculty of dentistry, Tanta university
Tanta, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: shaimaa eldesouky, assistant professor
- Email: shaimaaeldesouky@dent.tanta.edu.eg
- Phone: 01008994242
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Restorations After Full-Mouth Dental Rehab Under General Anesthesia in Children
This study tests how well different dental restorations hold up over two years in kids who had full-mouth rehabilitation under general anesthesia.
-
Using zinc oxide ozonated olive oil for treating dental pulp issues in children
This study is testing if a new treatment using zinc oxide-ozonated olive oil can help children aged 4-7 with dental pulp problems in their baby teeth better than a common antibiotic paste.
-
Oral N-Acetylcysteine for Diabetic Macular Edema
This study tests whether taking N-acetylcysteine by mouth can help people with center-involving diabetic macular edema who don’t yet need anti-VEGF therapy.
-
3D-Printed versus Conventional Palatal Cribs for Tongue Thrust in Children
This study tests whether a 3D-printed cobalt-chromium palatal crib works better than a traditional soldered stainless steel crib to help kids stop tongue thrusting.
-
Dia-Root Bio MTA vs MTA Plus forIndirect Pulp Capping in Young Permanent Molars
This trial tests whether Dia-Root Bio MTA works as an indirect pulp cap in kids’ first permanent molars better or similar to standard MTA Plus.
-
Nanohydroxyapatite vs Fluoride Varnish for MIH Front Teeth
This trial tests whether a nanohydroxyapatite varnish can remineralize MIH-affected front teeth in 8–11 year-olds as effectively as a standard 5% fluoride varnish.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.