Clinical trial Recruiting at 9 sites Interventional Ages 18 and up

Artelac Complete MDO vs VISMED Multi eye drops for moderate to severe dry eye disease

Official title: A Double-Masked, Randomized, Parallel Group, Non-Inferiority Study to Evaluate the Performance and Safety of Artelac® Complete MDO® Versus VISMED® MULTI Eye Drops in the Management of Moderate to Severe Dry Eye Disease

Run by Bausch & Lomb Incorporated · NCT07593885 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This trial tests whether Artelac Complete MDO eye drops work as well as VISMED Multi eye drops for people with moderate to severe dry eye disease.

More Dry Eye trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment160 (estimated)
SponsorBausch & Lomb Incorporated
Industry-sponsored
Locations12 sites (Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg and 11 other locations)
StatusRecruiting
StartedApril 30, 2026
Main results expectedNovember 2026
Study endsNovember 2026
Registry record updatedSeptember 30, 2026
Trial IDNCT07593885 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults (18+) with moderate to severe dry eye disease who have used tear substitutes for at least one month and have an OSDI score ≥ 23 at screening.

Probably not a fit

Patients with dry eye etiologies outside the specified inclusion criteria or without a measurable response to tear substitutes may receive no benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This is a double-masked, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study comparing Artelac Complete MDO eye drops to VISMED Multi in adults with dry eye disease. Eligible participants have a history of tear substitute use and a confirmed diagnosis of dry eye related to conditions such as Sjögren’s syndrome or ocular surface disorders, with an OSDI score of 23 or higher. Participants will undergo a screening period and switch to preservative-free tear substitutes before randomization, followed by treatment and follow-up visits to assess safety and performance. The study is conducted at multiple university eye clinics in Germany under a lead sponsor, with no listed collaborators.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience similar or improved comfort and symptom relief with Artelac Complete MDO compared to VISMED Multi.

How similar studies have gone: Non-inferiority trials comparing two eye drop therapies have yielded mixed results; this study seeks to establish comparable safety and performance to an established product in a defined dry eye population.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Subject must be of legal age (at least 18) on the date the Informed Consent Form (ICF) is signed and must be able to read, understand, and provide written voluntary informed consent on the Ethics Committee (EC) approved ICF.
2. Subject who is able and willing to comply with all treatment and follow-up/study procedures.
3. Subject who have a history of using tear substitutes for at least 1 month prior to Visit 0 (Screening), and who will use preservative-free tear substitute (Artelac® Splash MDO®) for at least 10 days (± 3 days) immediately prior to randomization. All previously used tear substitutes will be discontinued at Visit 0 (Screening).
4. Subject with dry eye disease (DED) secondary to Sjögren's disease with clear functional disorders or subjects with epidermolysis bullosa, or ocular pemphigoid, absence or damage to the lacrimal gland, facial paralysis or lagophthalmos requiring use of tear substitutes.
5. Have a total OSDI score ≥ 23 at Visit 0 (Screening) and Visit 1 (Randomization)
6. Subject with at least 1 eye with the following signs of moderate to severe DED:

   1. TFBUT of \< 10sec (mean of 2 measurements) at both Visit 0 (Screening) and Visit 1 (Randomization).
   2. Total ocular surface staining score ≥ 4 at both Visit 0 (Screening) and Visit 1 (Randomization). This assessment combines corneal, nasal, and temporal bulbar conjunctival fluorescein staining, each graded 0-5 according to the Oxford Scheme.
7. If the subject is female, must not be breastfeeding and must fall into 1 of the following categories:

   a. Post-menopausal (12 months after last menses) b. Surgically sterile c. Using one of the following birth control methods throughout the duration of the study: i. Intrauterine device (inserted at least 14 days prior to Visit 0 \[Screening\]) ii. Barrier method (condom or diaphragm) with spermicide (at least 14 days prior to Visit 0 \[Screening\]) iii. Hormonal contraception (stable dose and formulation for at least 6 months prior to Visit 0 \[Screening\]) iv. Abstinence (if this is in alignment with the lifestyle of the subject) Female subject who are of childbearing potential (i.e., who are not post-menopausal or not surgically sterile), must have a negative urine pregnancy test result at Visit 0 (Screening).

Exclusion Criteria:

Ocular Exclusion Criteria

1. Subject who has received ocular surgery, including laser surgery, intraocular injections in either eye within 90 days prior to study start.
2. Subject with acute ocular trauma, acute (non-dry eye) ocular inflammation, or acute ocular infection in either eye within 45 days prior to study start.

   Treatment Exclusion Criteria
3. Subject with known hypersensitivity or contraindications to any of the ingredients in the study or comparator products or ART, (especially, hyaluronic acid, glycerol, Myritol and carbomer)
4. Subject with initiation of, or changes to, concomitant treatments that could affect dry eye within 30 days prior to Visit 0 (Screening) or with planned initiation, changes of such treatments during the study unless the investigator considers it clinically irrelevant.
5. Subject with initiation of, or changes to topical glucocorticoid and doxycycline treatments that could affect dry eye within 30 days prior to Visit 0 (Screening) or with planned initiation or changes of such medications during the study unless the investigator considers it clinically irrelevant.
6. Subject with initiation of, or changes to, topical cyclosporine that could affect dry eye within 90 days prior to Visit 0 (Screening), or with planned initiation or changes of such medications during the study
7. Subject that is using or used serum or plasma derived eye drops within three months before start of screening.
8. Subject have used an investigational drug or device within 30 days of Visit 0 (Screening) or be concurrently enrolled in another investigational drug or device study.
9. Subject has previously been randomized in the present Study BL-CO04-ARTLCOMP-1401.
10. The subject has a condition or is in a situation that, in the Investigator's opinion, may put the subject at significant risk, may confound the study results, or may interfere significantly with the subject's participation in the study.
11. Vulnerable subject who is unable to fully understand all aspects of the investigation that are relevant to the decision to participate, or who could be manipulated or unduly influenced as a result of a compromised position, expectation of benefits or fear of retaliatory response.

Where it's running

  • Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätklinikum Freiburg
    Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Universitäts-Augenklinik Heidelberg
    Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Department für Augenheilkunde
    Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig Maximilian University
    Munich, Bavaria, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Augen & Haut Zentrum-Praxis Dr. Jacobi
    Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Chiemsee Augentagesklinik, Prien
    Prien am Chiemsee, Bavaria, Germany
    Recruiting
Show 6 more locations
  • Augen-Zentrum-Nordwest
    Ahaus, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz
    Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
    Recruiting
  • University Saarland Medical Center
    Homburg, Saarland, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Medizinisches Versorungszentrum AR Augenblick Rheinland GmbH
    Brühl, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
    Not yet recruiting
  • University Eye Clinic Cologne
    Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
    Not yet recruiting
  • Klinik für Augenheilkunde / Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
    Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
    Not yet recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.