Antithrombotic options for acute coronary syndrome with coronary artery ectasia
Official title: Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Antiplatelet Monotherapy Plus Anticoagulation in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Coronary Artery Ectasia: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial
Run by Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez · NCT07511257 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether using rivaroxaban instead of the usual aspirin plus clopidogrel better prevents clot-related complications in adults hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome who have coronary artery ectasia.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 4 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 326 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Mexico City, Tlalpan) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 11, 2026 |
| Main results expected | June 2029 |
| Study ends | June 2029 |
| Registry record updated | April 9, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07511257 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18 to 80 hospitalized within seven days for STEMI or NSTEMI who have coronary artery ectasia confirmed by angiography and remain admitted for more than 24 hours.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients without coronary artery ectasia, those outside the 18–80 age range, or people with high bleeding risk or contraindications to anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy are unlikely to benefit from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
OVER-TIME II is a randomized multicenter Phase 4 trial comparing standard dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin 100 mg plus clopidogrel 75 mg) with an anticoagulant strategy including rivaroxaban 15 mg in patients presenting with ACS and angiographically confirmed coronary artery ectasia. Eligible adults 18–80 years are enrolled within seven days of an ACS event and require confirmation of ectasia by two interventional cardiologists and quantitative coronary angiography. The trial tracks thrombotic events, recurrent myocardial infarction, procedure-related complications, and bleeding and other safety outcomes over the treatment and follow-up period. Treatments are administered during hospital admission with protocolized follow-up at the lead site.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the approach could reduce heart attacks, distal embolization, and other clot-related complications in patients with ectatic coronary arteries compared with standard dual antiplatelet therapy.
How similar studies have gone: While anticoagulants have shown benefits in some acute coronary syndrome populations, randomized data specifically focused on patients with coronary artery ectasia are limited, so this approach builds on related evidence but remains relatively novel for CAE.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 18 to 80 years, of either sex, hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with or without ST-segment elevation. * Recent ACS within 7 days prior to enrollment, defined by all of the following: * Clinical presentation consistent with acute coronary syndrome. * Elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin above the 99th percentile. * Presence or absence of persistent ST-segment elevation. * Coronary artery ectasia in the culprit coronary artery, defined by all of the following: * The presence of ectasia will be determined by agreement of two expert interventional cardiologists, and will be confirmed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). * Identification of a culprit artery consistent with the electrocardiographic territory involved (in cases with ST-segment elevation) or with angiographic features suggestive of an atherothrombotic event, such as the presence of thrombus or reduced coronary flow. * Hospital admission lasting more than 24 hours. * Management with either percutaneous coronary intervention or medical therapy, as determined by the treating medical team. Intracoronary interventions such as stent implantation, balloon angioplasty, or thrombus aspiration are permitted. * Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent and to participate in the study. Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnant women. * Current indication for temporary or long-term anticoagulation therapy at the time of enrollment. * Severe chronic kidney disease, defined as KDIGO stage G4 or higher (estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \<30 mL/min/1.73 m²). * Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<30 mL/min/1.73 m² at hospital discharge. * History of major bleeding, active bleeding, or high bleeding risk, including but not limited to gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, or other conditions considered by the treating physician to confer a high risk of bleeding. * Advanced heart failure, defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<30% plus at least one of the following: * More than two hospitalizations or unplanned emergency department visits for heart failure in the past year, or * NYHA functional class III or IV symptoms despite optimal medical therapy at enrollment or within the previous 3 months.
Where it's running
-
Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia "Ignacio Chávez"
Mexico City, Tlalpan, Mexico Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Direccion de Investigación Instituto Nacional de Cardiología
- Email: comite.investigacion@cardiologia.org.mx
- Phone: +52 5555732911
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Risk of malignant arrhythmias after acute coronary syndrome
This study tracks how often dangerous heart rhythms occur in adults admitted for ACS and looks for patterns that might predict them.
-
Drug-coated balloons vs drug-eluting stents for immediate slow-flow/no-reflow in STEMI with high thrombus
This study tests whether using a drug-coated balloon instead of a drug-eluting stent during PCI helps reduce immediate slow-flow or no-reflow in STEMI patients with high thrombus burden.
-
Noninvasive Venous Stasis to Help Reperfuse the Heart in STEMI
This study tests whether briefly restricting venous return with a cuff before the usual heart attack treatment helps restore blood flow on its own.
-
Sustained thrombectomy plus PCI versus PCI alone in high thrombus burden STEMI
This trial tests whether adding sustained mechanical thrombectomy to PCI helps patients with STEMI and large clot burden, compared to PCI alone.
-
New prodrug CG-0255 Besylate vs Plavix in healthy adults
This study tests whether CG-0255 Besylate works similarly to Plavix® in healthy adults to understand how the two drugs behave in the body.
-
Biomarker patterns in ACS patients with pneumonia and COPD after flu vaccination
This study tests whether certain blood biomarkers change in people with acute coronary syndrome who also have pneumonia and COPD, and whether flu vaccination affects those biomarker levels.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.