NIH-funded research P01 program project

Understanding how doctor habits and workloads affect care for people with Alzheimer's and related dementias

Official title: Project 3 - Inside the Black Box of Clinical Decision-Making: Provider Practice Habits, Provider Caseloads, and Implications for Patients with ADRD

Funded at National Bureau of Economic Research · NIH-11420407 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This grant looks at how doctors decide on care for people with ADRD in the emergency department and how provider workload and team dynamics influence outcomes.

More Decision Making research and trials

Quick facts

Grant typeP01 program project
Study typeNIH-funded research
Funding institutionNational Bureau of Economic Research
NIH-funded
Lab location1 site (Cambridge, United States)
Project startFebruary 1, 1997
Project endAugust 31, 2029
Funding year2026
Award (this year)$388,218
NIH project number5P01AG005842-37
Project IDNIH-11420407 on NIH RePORTER

Who could benefit from this research

Could help

Patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias who present to emergency departments could potentially benefit from improved decision-making processes.

Less likely to help

Patients without ADRD or those not experiencing ED-level care decisions may see no direct benefit.

What this research studies

The project analyzes high-frequency EHR data from UCSF Emergency Department encounters between 2017 and 2019 to understand how clinical decisions are made for patients with ADRD. It seeks to relate provider characteristics, documentation practices, and workload to the quality of care and patient outcomes. The goal is to inform the design of technologies and organizational changes that can improve decision-making and care for ADRD patients. The study will describe patient health needs in the ED, compare ADRD vs non-ADRD care, and examine how differences among physicians affect management and outcomes.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, it could lead to smarter ED workflows and tools that improve accuracy, efficiency, and outcomes for patients with ADRD.

How similar studies have gone: Previous work using EHR data has yielded insights into clinician decision-making, but applying it specifically to ADRD care in EDs is novel.

Where this research is happening

  • National Bureau of Economic Research
    Cambridge, United States
    Active

Researchers

  • Principal investigator: Kolstad, Jonathan T. — National Bureau of Economic Research
  • Study coordinator: Kolstad, Jonathan T.

Related research

Other NIH-funded projects on the same topics.

About this research

  1. This is an active NIH-funded research project — typically early-stage science, not a clinical trial accepting patient enrollment.
  2. Some NIH-funded labs run parallel clinical studies or seek volunteers for related work. To check, contact the principal investigator or institution listed above.
  3. For full project details, budget, and progress reports, visit the official NIH RePORTER page.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.