Wearable cardiac monitoring for early arrhythmia detection and remote management
Official title: FAPO-2: Cardiac Patient Monitoring Tool for Clinical Observation and Arrhythmia Detection
Run by University of Sao Paulo · NCT07174206 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This project will try a smartwatch-based system to spot arrhythmias early and help manage adults with chronic or recently treated heart problems.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 22 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 520 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Sao Paulo Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (São Paulo, São Paulo) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 7, 2025 |
| Main results expected | January 31, 2026 |
| Study ends | February 28, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | September 15, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07174206 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 22 or older with diagnosed cardiovascular disease or recent minimally invasive cardiac procedures who can consent and wear a smartwatch are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with wrist skin conditions or tattoos that interfere with optical sensors, known allergies to device materials, or inability to participate in telemonitoring are unlikely to benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
FAPO-2 is a prospective, interventional, non-randomized study that uses wearable devices and a centralized digital platform to generate automated alerts and trigger teleconsultations for adult cardiac patients. About 520 patients aged 22 and older, stratified by sex, will be enrolled at the Heart Institute (InCor) of the University of São Paulo and followed remotely and in clinic. The intervention combines continuous smartwatch ECG/HR data, a portable Holter system, telemonitoring workflows, and AI model development to enable early arrhythmia detection, remote risk stratification, and timely clinical action. The study will also collect usability and cost-efficiency data to inform real-world implementation.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, it could enable earlier arrhythmia detection and faster clinical response, reducing complications and unnecessary hospital visits.
How similar studies have gone: Previous wearable-based studies have shown promise for detecting atrial fibrillation and supporting remote outpatient care, though evidence on improved long-term clinical outcomes and clear cost savings is still mixed.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients diagnosed with cardiovascular disease, of both sexes, aged over 22 years; * Provision of informed consent through signature of the Informed Consent Form (ICF); * Assentation to adhere to study procedures and requirements; * Patients indicated for outpatient follow-up due to a cardiovascular condition, or with clinical parameters indicating the need for conventional surgical or catheter-based interventions (e.g., catheter ablation for arrhythmias, transcatheter aortic valve implantation, percutaneous coronary intervention, etc.); * Low or no risk of skin injury, based on Braden Scale clinical criteria or clinical team assessment Exclusion Criteria: * Presence of skin conditions, such as vitiligo, lupus, or atopic dermatitis, as well as tattoos on the wrist that may interfere with the smartwatch's optical sensor readings; * Known sensitivity or history of allergic reactions to components of the wearable devices or related items, such as adhesives or electrodes; * Inability to properly use the wearable monitoring devices due to physical, cognitive, or technological limitations; * Presence of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) or arteriovenous fistula; * Presence of implanted cardiac devices, such as pacemakers, defibrillators, or cardiac resynchronization devices, which prevent ECG acquisition via smartwatch; * Diagnosis of conditions associated with narrowing or obstruction of the aorta and subclavian arteries (e.g., Stanford Type A chronic aortic dissection, Takayasu arteritis, Subclavian Steal Syndrome, or Kawasaki disease), which may cause discrepancies in blood pressure between upper limbs and interfere with study assessments.
Where it's running
-
Instituto do Coracao, HCFMUSP
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Fabio B Jatene, PhD, MD
- Email: fabio.jatene@incor.usp.br
- Phone: +551126615462
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Pulsed Field vs Cryoballoon for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation can shorten the procedure for first-time PVI in AF patients compared with cryoballoon ablation, while keeping safety and effectiveness similar.
-
Pulsed Field Ablation vs Cryoablation for Atrial Fibrillation Under Deep Sedation
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation (PFA) done under deep sedation works as well as cryoballoon ablation for treating atrial fibrillation, aiming to avoid general anesthesia.
-
Bachmann’s Bundle Pacing vs Right Atrial Appendage Pacing for AF
This study tests two common atrial pacing methods to see which one is safer over 12 months for people getting a new pacemaker, ICD, or CRT device.
-
AI-powered ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes in heart disease
Researchers test an AI-enhanced ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes for people with cardiovascular diseases.
-
Pace-and-ablate strategy in atrial fibrillation: who benefits and long-term outcomes
This study looks at adults with atrial fibrillation who underwent AV node ablation with permanent pacing to see who develops pacing-induced problems and how they do long-term.
-
AI-based cardiac analysis using 12-lead and 1-lead ECG
A clinician-facing pilot test to see if SmartECG-EF helps evaluate heart function using both 12-lead and single-lead ECGs in adults with heart conditions.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.