Weak scalp electrical stimulation to protect the brain after an acute ischemic stroke
Official title: Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Stroke EaRly After Onset Clinical Trial 2
Run by University of California, Los Angeles · NCT06440707 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether a weak electrical current applied to the scalp can increase collateral blood flow and protect brain tissue in adults with acute ischemic stroke who are not candidates for clot removal.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 2 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 120 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of California, Los Angeles Academic / other |
| Locations | 3 sites (Los Angeles, California and 2 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 15, 2025 |
| Main results expected | January 1, 2030 |
| Study ends | August 1, 2030 |
| Registry record updated | May 1, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06440707 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (over 18) with an acute focal neurologic deficit from ischemic stroke, NIHSS score ≥4 (or disabling deficit if NIHSS <4), cortical vessel occlusion, and a salvageable penumbra on imaging who can be treated within 24 hours are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who are eligible for endovascular thrombectomy, lack a salvageable penumbra on imaging, present after 24 hours, or have non-cortical strokes are unlikely to benefit from this intervention.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a multi-site, phase 2a, randomized, sham-controlled, adaptive study testing cathodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (C-tDCS) in acute ischemic stroke. Eligible patients who arrive at participating emergency departments within 24 hours of last known well and who are not candidates for endovascular thrombectomy will be enrolled and stratified by thrombolytic eligibility. Participants are randomized 5:1 to active stimulation versus sham, and active-arm patients receive varying doses (strength and duration) in ranked cohorts to identify an optimal dose. The primary outcomes focus on safety and imaging markers of tissue salvage and collateral blood flow measured with multimodal brain scans.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could increase blood flow to threatened brain tissue and improve outcomes for patients who cannot receive clot-removal therapies.
How similar studies have gone: Noninvasive brain stimulation has shown mixed, mostly preliminary results for stroke recovery, and using cathodal tDCS specifically for acute neuroprotection and collateral enhancement is largely novel and unproven.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * New focal neurologic deficit consistent with AIS * National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥4 or NIHSS\< 4 in the presence of disabling deficit (a deficit that, if unchanged, would prevent the * patient from performing basic activities of daily living such as bathing, ambulating, toileting, hygiene, and eating or returning to work) * Age\>18 * Presence of any cortical vessel occlusion, including Internal Carotid Artery, branches of Middle Cerebral Artery, Anterior Cerebral Artery, Posterior Cerebral Artery, Posterior-Inferior Cerebellar Artery * Presence of salvageable penumbra with perfusion lesion volume to ischemic core volume ratio of ≥ 1.2 on multimodal imaging * Patient ineligible for endovascular thrombectomy per American Heart/Stroke Associations Guidelines * Patient is able to be treated with tDCS within 24 hours of last known well time * A signed informed consent is obtained from the patient or patient's legally authorized representative Additional inclusion criteria for non-thrombolytic patients • Patient ineligible for IV lytics per American Heart/American Stroke Associations National Guidelines Additional inclusion criteria for thrombolytic receiving patients * Patient eligible for tPA per Guidelines * Within 2-hours from intravenous thrombolytic start of administration Exclusion Criteria: * Acute intracranial hemorrhage * Presence of MRI and gadolinium contraindications including cardiac implantable devices, cochlear implant, implanted neurostimulation device, unremovable metallic body piercing, magnetic dental implants, drug infusion pumps, estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 35 mL/min/1.73 m2, allergy to gadolinium * Evidence of a large Ischemic core volume more than equal to 100 cc * Presence of transcranial direct current stimulation contraindications - electrically or magnetically activated intracranial metal and non-metal implants. * Pregnancy * Signs or symptoms of acute myocardial infarction on admission * History of seizure disorder or new seizures with presentation of current stroke * Evidence of any other major life-threatening or serious medical condition that would prevent completion of the study protocol, including attendance at the 3-month follow-up visit * Concomitant experimental therapy * Preexisting scalp lesion at the site of the stimulation or presence of skull defects (may alter current flow * pattern) * Preexisting coagulopathy * Patients suspected of having infective endocarditis and ischemic stroke related to septic emboli * Patients suspected or known to be infected with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) * Patient with radiographic evidence or suspicion of chronic conditions that may predispose them to intracranial hemorrhage, including brain arteriovenous malformations, cerebral cavernous malformations, cerebral telangiectasia, multiple previous intracerebral hemorrhages (amyloid angiopathy) * Suspected cerebral vasculitis based on medical history and imaging * Suspected cysticercosis * Suspected cranial dural arteriovenous fistula * Cerebral venous thrombosis * Head trauma causing loss of consciousness, concussion, confusion, or a headache within the past 30 days * Patient has suffered a hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke within the last three (3) months * History of cancer known to cause hemorrhagic metastases, e.g., melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, * choriocarcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, lung carcinoma, breast carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma * History of left atrial myxoma * Evidence of dissection in the intracranial cerebral arteries * Suspicion of aortic dissection * Significant mass effect with midline shift * The patient is in a coma
Where it's running
-
University of California- Los Angeles (UCLA)
Los Angeles, California, United States Recruiting -
Johns Hopkins Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States Recruiting -
Duke Medical Center Hospital
Durham, North Carolina, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Mersedeh Bahr-Hosseini, MD
- Email: MBahrHosseini@mednet.ucla.edu
- Phone: 310-794-1195
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Short-Term outside-in nerve stimulation for acute ischemic stroke
This trial tests whether a 5-day external trigeminal nerve stimulation given after stroke can help more patients recover better than a sham treatment.
-
Sevoflurane vs. Propofol for anesthesia in stroke patients undergoing clot-removal
This study tests whether sevoflurane or propofol used for anesthesia during endovascular treatment of an acute ischemic stroke affects the final brain damage and recovery.
-
Safety of adding NRICM301 to standard care for adults with acute ischemic stroke
This study tests whether adding NRICM301, a traditional Chinese medicine formula, to usual care is safe for adults with acute ischemic stroke.
-
Intracranial Recanalization with LT3001 in Acute Ischemic Stroke
This phase II study tests whether LT3001 given to adults with acute ischemic stroke can help reopen blocked brain arteries.
-
Mobilisation After Endovascular Stroke Treatment
This study checks whether moving around 12 hours after endovascular stroke treatment is as safe as moving around 24 hours for people with an acute ischemic stroke.
-
Endovascular therapy plus standard care vs standard care alone for distal and medium vessel strokes
In people with acute ischemic stroke due to distal or medium vessel blockages, this study tests whether adding endovascular treatment to the usual medical care helps improve outcomes compared with medical care alone.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.