VATS vs Intrapleural Enzymatic Therapy for Empyema in Adults
Official title: VATS or Intrapleural Enzymatic Therapy for patientS With Empyema (the VIETS Trial).
Run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) · NCT07886541 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether VATS surgery or intrapleural enzymatic therapy helps adults with pleural infection (empyema) when standard treatment hasn’t worked.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 4 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 164 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Amsterdam) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 7, 2026 |
| Main results expected | October 2028 |
| Study ends | October 2029 |
| Registry record updated | November 10, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07886541 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults 18 years or older with pneumonia-related pleural infection who have failed standard chest-tube therapy and are suitable for either VATS or IET.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who do not meet eligibility, who have contraindications to surgery or enzymatic therapy, or who do not show disease progression despite initial treatment may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Adults with pneumonia-related pleural infection who fail standard chest-tube therapy are randomized to receive either video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or intrapleural enzymatic therapy (IET). The study aims to compare clinical outcomes such as mortality and length of hospital stay, along with costs and recovery measures. It uses a head-to-head, interventional design to determine which modality provides better control of infection and faster recovery. The trial is conducted at multiple centers led by Amsterdam UMC with collaborating hospitals. Enrollment targets adults 18 and older with biopsy-confirmed or radiologically suspected parapneumonic pleural infection after failure of initial care.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could guide doctors to choose the more effective treatment, potentially reducing hospital stays and improving recovery for patients with empyema.
How similar studies have gone: Head-to-head comparisons of VATS and IET in empyema are limited, making this a novel, but clinically meaningful, investigation.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥ 18 years with pneumonia and suspected parapneumonic pleural infection, evidenced by (both obligatory): * Pleural fluid which is either * Purulent * Gram stain or culture positive * Acidic (pH\<7.2) * Low in glucose (\<2 mmol/L) AND * Radiological suspicion of parapneumonic pleural infection (on either radiograph, ultrasound (US) or Computed Tomography-scan (CT-scan)), e.g. showing septations (US) or pleural contrast enhancement (CT) * Fit for surgery (ie able to be ventilated on one lung during the procedure). * Failure of standard care (consisting of a chest tube and antibiotics) as judged by the treating physician ≤ 24 h after chest tube insertion, considering: Radiology (significant residual pleural collections on imaging); Insufficient decrease of inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC)); Clinical status of the patient (lack of improvement). * Able to provide informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients not fit for surgery. * Patients requiring direct surgery (e.g. dry tap). These are patients in which a non-surgical approach is considered to be not successful from the start. This decision will be made by combining the clinical status of the patient and the findings of the additional (radiological) investigations. * Patients with a suspected or confirmed bronchopleural fistula. * Need for more than two chest tubes at presentation. * Any contraindication to IET (bleeding risk, allergy). * A parapneumonic pleural infection with another cause than a pneumonia (e.g. infection after an intervention or after pulmonary/esophageal surgery, but also pneumonia related to obstruction due to lung cancer). * Previous treatment of a parapneumonic pleural infection \<1 year ago, a history of pulmonary surgery on the same side of the parapneumonic pleural infection. * Life expectancy \<3 months and/or suffer from a terminal illness. * Patients who are pregnant or lactating (pregnancy status will be confirmed prior to randomisation for woman of childbearing potential).
Where it's running
-
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, Netherlands Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Wilja de Jonge, MD
- Email: w.r.dejonge@amsterdamumc.nl
- Phone: +31650063948
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Once-daily intrapleural enzyme treatment for complicated pleural infections
This will see if giving tPA and DNase once a day through a chest tube works as well as giving them twice a day for people with complicated pleural infections.
-
Early Pleural Irrigation with Saline vs Standard Care for Complicated Pleural Infections
This trial tests whether irrigating the pleural space with saline soon after drainage is better than standard care for adults with complicated pleural infections.
-
Flushing chest drains to improve outcomes in pleural infections
This study is testing if flushing chest drains with saline every six hours can help people with serious lung infections recover faster and spend less time in the hospital.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.