Using preferred communication tools to reduce challenging behavior
Official title: Harnessing Communication Preferences to Enhance Its Persistence and Mitigate Relapse of Challenging Behavior
Run by University of Georgia · NCT07278544 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This project will test whether using a person's favored communication tool (for example a touch talker or picture cards) helps keep behavior improvements and prevents relapse in people with intellectual or developmental disabilities who have little or no verbal speech.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 2 Years to 90 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 60 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Georgia Academic / other |
| Locations | 2 sites (Athens, Georgia and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 15, 2025 |
| Main results expected | March 31, 2031 |
| Study ends | March 31, 2031 |
| Registry record updated | December 12, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07278544 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are people aged 2 years and older with an intellectual or developmental disability who engage in challenging behavior, have little to no functional verbal communication, and can demonstrate proficiency with two device-based AAC strategies.
✕Probably not a fit
People who communicate functionally with vocal speech, cannot be safely observed during assessment, or can only use a single AAC strategy are unlikely to benefit from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The study will recruit about 60 individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities who engage in challenging behaviors and have little to no functional verbal communication. Investigators will identify two device-based augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) strategies for each participant using validated proficiency and preference assessments, then label them as preferred and lesser-preferred modalities. Participants will receive functional communication training (FCT) with both the preferred and non-preferred AAC strategies and researchers will compare how well each approach maintains gains and resists relapse when interventions are disrupted. The trial will also examine whether age, baseline symptom severity, or communication functioning predict which modality produces more persistent benefits.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this work could help caregivers and clinicians choose communication methods that better maintain behavioral improvements and reduce relapse risk.
How similar studies have gone: Functional communication training and AAC approaches have strong evidence for reducing challenging behavior, but using a person's communication preference to improve treatment maintenance and prevent relapse is a relatively novel question with limited prior data.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * 2 years old and older. * Diagnosis of intellectual or developmental disability. * Referred for assessment and treatment of challenging behavior. Exclusion Criteria: * Challenging behavior does not occur within the context of structured assessment, eliminating the ability to identify its operant function, or the behavior is deemed too dangerous to safely observe during assessment. * Communicate functionally using vocal/verbal communication. * Can only identify one proficient AAC strategy.
Where it's running
-
University of Georgia
Athens, Georgia, United States Recruiting -
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Joel Ringdahl, PhD
- Email: ringdahl@uga.edu
- Phone: 319-594-2071
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Using heart rate to improve care for non-verbal patients
This study is testing if using heart rate data can help caregivers provide better and more comfortable care for non-verbal patients, like those with autism.
-
Leopard: using multi-omics to boost genetic diagnosis for neurodevelopmental disorders
This study tests a multi-omics approach to find genetic explanations for neurodevelopmental disorders in people with moderate-to-severe intellectual disability.
-
Theta Burst Stimulation for Emotion Regulation in Autism With Minimal Verbal Ability or Intellectual Disability
This trial tests whether intermittent theta burst stimulation to the left prefrontal cortex can help improve emotion regulation in people with autism who are minimally verbal or have an intellectual disability.
-
Inclusive physical activity program for adults with intellectual disabilities
This study is testing a new fitness program for adults with intellectual disabilities to see if it helps them be more active and feel better over 16 weeks.
-
Deep brain stimulation for severe self-injurious behavior in children with autism
This study is testing if deep brain stimulation can help children with autism who struggle with severe self-injurious behavior feel better.
-
Home-based parenting support for parents with intellectual disabilities
This study tests a special parenting program for parents with intellectual disabilities to see if it helps them improve their skills and keep their children safe from neglect.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.