Using heart CT scans and genetic risk scores to guide heart disease prevention in people with type 2 diabetes

EValuation Of poLygenic Scores and CT imAging In Risk Factor Modification in Patients With diabEtes

Not applicable Interventional Monash University · NCT07091162

This trial will test whether giving people with type 2 diabetes either a heart CT scan result or a genetic risk score helps them stick to medicines and lifestyle changes and reduce early coronary plaque.

Quick facts

PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional
Enrollment90 (estimated)
Ages40 Years and up
SexAll
SponsorMonash University Academic / other
Locations1 site (Melbourne, Victoria)
Trial IDNCT07091162 on ClinicalTrials.gov

What this trial studies

VOLTAIRE is a prospective, three-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial enrolling 90 adults aged 40 years or older with type 2 diabetes and no established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Participants are randomized 1:1:1 to receive risk counselling plus CT coronary angiography (CTCA) results, risk counselling plus a polygenic risk score (PRS) result, or standard risk counselling, with nurse-led motivational interviewing used for counselling sessions. The primary outcome is change in non-calcified plaque volume measured by serial CTCA at 12 months, and secondary outcomes include LDL cholesterol, medication adherence, and patient engagement. The trial is conducted at the Victorian Heart Hospital in Melbourne and excludes patients with clinically manifest cardiovascular disease or CT findings that require immediate clinical action.

Who should consider this trial

Good fit: Adults aged 40 years or older with type 2 diabetes, no known atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, acceptable CT imaging quality, and who can have a PRS calculated and attend follow-up visits are the ideal candidates.

Not a fit: People with established coronary artery disease, CT findings that require immediate clinical management, inability to undergo CT imaging, or inability to complete follow-up are unlikely to benefit from this protocol.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could help people with type 2 diabetes better follow preventive treatments and slow progression of early coronary plaque, potentially lowering future heart attack risk.

How similar studies have performed: Personalized CT imaging to inform risk has prior evidence of changing management and behavior, polygenic risk scoring is an emerging approach with mixed early results, and combining CTCA and PRS for behavior change is relatively novel.

Eligibility criteria

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Age 40 years or older
* Established diagnosis of T2DM
* Having acceptable imaging quality as deemed by the VHI-AICL
* Able to have a PRS calculated

Exclusion Criteria:

* Unable to provide written informed consent.
* Unwilling to be followed for serial evaluation
* Clinically manifest CV disease
* Evidence of clinically significant coronary disease on CT that would preclude masking from participant's treating clinician for the duration of the study on the grounds of safety, including but not limited to, equal/greater than 50% in the left main coronary artery or equal/greater than 70% in any epicardial coronary artery
* Unable to participate in the study or complete protocol required assessments in the opinion of the Investigator

Where this trial is running

Melbourne, Victoria

Study contacts

How to participate

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Conditions Cardiovascular DiseasesType 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Last reviewed 2026-06-13 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.