Using EEG to Distinguish Between Types of Stroke
Official title: Electroencephalogram (EEG) in Differentiation Between Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke and Its Role as a Predictor of Post-stroke Recovery
Run by Assiut University · NCT06984965 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing if brain activity measured by EEG can help doctors tell the difference between two types of strokes and predict how well patients will recover.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 300 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Assiut University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Asyut, Asyut Governorate) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | March 2027 |
| Study ends | March 2027 |
| Registry record updated | November 5, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06984965 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 to 80 who have experienced their first-ever acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 72 hours.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with transient ischemic attacks, those beyond 72 hours post-stroke, or those with certain neurological conditions may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This observational study investigates the electrical activity of the brain using EEG in patients with acute ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. EEG recordings will be conducted within 72 hours of stroke onset to analyze differences in brain activity patterns associated with each stroke type. The study aims to determine if EEG can serve as a reliable tool for differentiating between these two conditions and predicting post-stroke recovery outcomes. Data will be collected at baseline and followed up over an average period of 3 to 6 months to assess recovery patterns.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could enhance the accuracy of stroke diagnosis and improve recovery predictions for patients.
How similar studies have gone: While EEG has been used in stroke assessments, this specific approach to differentiate between ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age above 18 and below 80 years. * Acute Ischemic stroke: ischemic arteria cerebri media infarct confirmed by MRI. * Acute Hemorrhagic stroke: spontaneous intraparenchymal bleeding confirmed by CT. * Stroke onset \<72 hours before expected time of performing EEG. * First-ever ischemic stroke. * Measurable deficit on the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). * Able to give and sign informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs). * Greater than 72 hours past the initial insult. * Patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage, traumatic haemorrhage (epidural/subdural bleeding), cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, indication for urgent neurosurgical intervention. * History of other central nervous system diseases. * Any signs unfit for MRI/EEG scan. * Injury or active infection of electrode cap placement area. * Claustrophobia; recognition disorder. * Known skull defect or head trauma. * Previous neurological procedure (metallic implant, brain pace, cranial operation history). * Significant physical impairment that would restrict the ability to use the portable EEG devices. * Presence of malignancy or systemic rheumatic disease * Non-stroke disease or lesion affecting the sensorimotor system. * Alcohol or drug addiction. * Presence of pump/shunt. * Presence of Malignancy. * Presence of severe cognitive impairment. * History of epilepsy or taking medication due to epilepsy.
Where it's running
-
Neurology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Gena ELassall, Bachelor of medicine and gener
- Email: genaelassall312@gmail.com
- Phone: +201028914897
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Short-Term outside-in nerve stimulation for acute ischemic stroke
This trial tests whether a 5-day external trigeminal nerve stimulation given after stroke can help more patients recover better than a sham treatment.
-
Sevoflurane vs. Propofol for anesthesia in stroke patients undergoing clot-removal
This study tests whether sevoflurane or propofol used for anesthesia during endovascular treatment of an acute ischemic stroke affects the final brain damage and recovery.
-
Safety of adding NRICM301 to standard care for adults with acute ischemic stroke
This study tests whether adding NRICM301, a traditional Chinese medicine formula, to usual care is safe for adults with acute ischemic stroke.
-
Intracranial Recanalization with LT3001 in Acute Ischemic Stroke
This phase II study tests whether LT3001 given to adults with acute ischemic stroke can help reopen blocked brain arteries.
-
Mobilisation After Endovascular Stroke Treatment
This study checks whether moving around 12 hours after endovascular stroke treatment is as safe as moving around 24 hours for people with an acute ischemic stroke.
-
Endovascular therapy plus standard care vs standard care alone for distal and medium vessel strokes
In people with acute ischemic stroke due to distal or medium vessel blockages, this study tests whether adding endovascular treatment to the usual medical care helps improve outcomes compared with medical care alone.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.