Ureteral access sheath: omitting versus placing a stent after ureteroscopy
Official title: Access Sheath and stENT Trial
Run by University of Michigan · NCT07297953 · Data updated 2026-11-12
We will test if leaving out a ureteral stent after ureteroscopy with an access sheath works as well as placing a stent for pre-stented adults with kidney or ureteral stones.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 184 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Michigan Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Ann Arbor, Michigan) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 24, 2025 |
| Main results expected | September 2026 |
| Study ends | October 2026 |
| Registry record updated | December 22, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07297953 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults who are pre-stented and planned for unilateral ureteroscopy with a ureteral access sheath for kidney or ureteral stones and who can complete study surveys and follow-up.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with intraoperative ureteral injury (PULS ≥2), ureteral strictures, certain anatomical abnormalities, pregnancy, or those not pre-stented are unlikely to benefit from the stent-omission approach tested here.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Patients who consent will complete baseline patient-reported outcome questionnaires and undergo ureteroscopy using a ureteral access sheath. The operating urologist will grade the ureter for injury using the Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS), and only those with PULS 0 or 1 will be randomized 1:1 to stent omission or stent placement. When a stent is placed, the type and whether a tether (string) is left will be left to the surgeon's discretion. The trial will compare patient-reported pain outcomes (PROMIS Pain Interference and Pain Intensity) and 30-day healthcare utilization between the two arms.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, some patients could avoid the discomfort and inconvenience of a ureteral stent while keeping similar pain and quality-of-life outcomes and reducing short-term healthcare use.
How similar studies have gone: Previous randomized and observational studies have suggested stent omission can be safe and reduce stent-related symptoms after uncomplicated ureteroscopy, though results vary by patient selection and technique.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Provision of signed and dated informed consent form * Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study * Planned ureteroscopy using a Ureteral Access Sheath (UAS) for treatment of unilateral kidney and/or ureteral stones in patients that have an existing ureteral stent (pre-stented) * Planned treatment of unilateral renal and/or ureteral stones, in a single procedure. * Renal stone defined as only renal location of stone(s) * Ureteral stone defined as ureteral only location of stone(s) * Ureteral and renal stone(s) * No evidence of significant ureteral injury on intra-operative assessment (Post-Ureteroscopy Lesion Scale (PULS) Grade 0 or 1) * Ability and willingness to complete and adhere to survey questions and responses throughout study duration. Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnancy * Ureteric injury during ureteroscopy (PULS ≥ Grade 2) * Evidence of ureteral stricture * Anatomical abnormalities (e.g., solitary, horseshoe, fused crossed ectopia, pelvic kidney, urinary diversion) * Known planned secondary or staged procedure * Indwelling nephrostomy tube * Bilateral ureteroscopy
Where it's running
-
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Khurshid Ghani, MD — University of Michigan
- Study coordinator: MUSIC Coordinating Center
- Email: esekulos@med.umich.edu
- Phone: 734-232-4906
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Emergency urinary drainage followed by PCNL in obstructive urosepsis
Doctors test whether the method of emergency drainage (retrograde ureteral stent or percutaneous nephrostomy) affects how well patients do after undergoing definitive PCNL.
-
Observation vs Upfront Surgery for Asymptomatic Kidney Stones in Children and Adults
This trial tests whether watching asymptomatic kidney stones or performing upfront surgery is better for reducing life disruption in patients aged 6 and older.
-
Two-Tier Virtual Reality Education to Reduce Anxiety Before Kidney Stone Surgery
This study tests whether a two-tier VR preoperative education approach can lower anxiety and improve knowledge and self-care in adults undergoing urolithiasis surgery.
-
Positioning strategies to treat proximal ureteral stones
This study tests whether reverse Trendelenburg or T-tilt positioning during ureteroscopy help treat proximal ureteral stones more efficiently in adults.
-
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg with Tadalafil 5 mg versus 2.5 mg to reduce symptoms from ureteral stents
This will test whether adding Tadalafil at 5 mg or 2.5 mg to Tamsulosin 0.4 mg better reduces stent-related symptoms for adults with a double-J ureteral stent after stone removal.
-
Using a flexible suction sheath with flexible ureteroscopy for lower-pole kidney stones
This trial will test whether adding a flexible, navigable suction sheath to flexible ureteroscopy helps adults with lower-pole kidney stones become stone-free more often and avoid repeat procedures.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.