Understanding Patient Choices in Rectal Cancer Treatment
Official title: PATHOS Tradeoffs in Patient Decision Making About Rectal Cancer Treatment: Benefits Compared to Quality Of Life.
Run by Sir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish General Hospital · NCT04925154 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is trying to understand what treatment options people with operable rectal cancer prefer and how their choices are influenced by their personal circumstances.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 192 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Sir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish General Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Montreal, Quebec) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 13, 2021 |
| Main results expected | December 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | January 1, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | May 14, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT04925154 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates include adults over 18 years old with operable rectal cancer who can provide informed consent and complete online questionnaires.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with metastatic disease, recurrent tumors, or those unable to communicate in English or French may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This observational study aims to explore the treatment preferences of patients with operable rectal cancer and the socio-economic factors influencing these choices. It will involve 192 participants, including 178 patients and 14 treating physicians, who will complete two questionnaires assessing their treatment preferences and the trade-offs between benefits and quality of life. Participants will receive an informational brochure detailing various treatment options after the first questionnaire to aid in their decision-making process.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could enhance patient-centered care by better aligning treatment options with patient preferences and quality of life considerations.
How similar studies have gone: While there have been studies on treatment preferences in cancer care, this specific approach focusing on socio-economic factors and quality of life trade-offs is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Group A * New rectal cancer patient * Operable patients * Capable adults older than 18 years of age * Capacity to sign a consent form * Capacity to answer questionnaires on an online platform Group B * Treating physician specialists * Capacity to sign a consent form * Capacity to answer questionnaires on an online platform Exclusion Criteria: Group A: * Patient unable to sign a consent form * Patients with metastasis * Recurrent tumours * Inability to answer questionnaires on an online platform * Inability to communicate in french or english Group B: * Participant unable to sign a consent form * Inability to answer questionnaires on an online platform
Where it's running
-
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Té Vuong — Lady Davis Institute - JGH
- Study coordinator: Emma Starr, BHSc
- Email: emma.starr.ccomtl@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
- Phone: 514-340-8222
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Family involvement in treatment decisions for very old ICU patients
This study observes how families and ICU teams communicate with patients 75 and older to see how family meetings affect planning and care.
-
Examining plaque characteristics in patients deferred from coronary intervention
This study is trying to see if certain types of plaque in the arteries can help predict heart problems in patients who were not treated with a heart procedure.
-
Using TENS units to reduce pain during IUD insertion
This study is testing if using TENS units can help reduce pain for women aged 12 to 50 during IUD insertion.
-
Helping elderly patients discuss their end-of-life care preferences
This study is trying to see if helping elderly patients talk about their end-of-life care wishes can lead to better care and satisfaction compared to standard practices.
-
Comparing Dexamethasone Inserts to Standard Steroid Drops After Eye Surgery
This study is testing whether a new eye insert can work better than regular steroid eye drops for patients recovering from eye surgery.
-
Evaluating patient preference for dropless versus drops after cataract surgery
This study is testing whether a new eye insert can help people with cataract surgery feel better and have less pain compared to using eye drops.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.