Ultrasound-guided vs fluoroscopy-guided lumbar nerve injections for leg/back pain
Official title: Ultrasound-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Selective Lumbar Nerve Root Injections for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Run by Tanta University · NCT07627308 · Data updated 2026-11-12
In adults with leg and lower back nerve pain, this study tests whether ultrasound guidance works as well as traditional X-ray guidance for lumbar nerve root injections.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 64 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Tanta University Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Tanta, Gharbia Governorate) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | July 31, 2026 |
| Study ends | October 30, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | June 4, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07627308 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18–75 with MRI-confirmed lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation or foraminal stenosis who have not improved after at least 3 months of conservative care.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with isolated S1 radiculopathy, significant spinal deformities, prior lumbar surgery, or contraindications to injections may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized clinical trial compares ultrasound-guided selective lumbar nerve root injections to fluoroscopy-guided injections in adults with lumbosacral radiculopathy. Participants are assigned 1:1 to receive a targeted nerve injection of a steroid and numbing medicine using either ultrasound or fluoroscopy. The study aims to see if ultrasound provides similar pain relief at 3 months, supports better recovery in daily activities, and offers comparable speed and safety to fluoroscopy while eliminating radiation exposure. It is conducted at Tanta University Hospitals and uses MRI-confirmed nerve compression with prior conservative treatment failure. Primary outcomes focus on pain relief, functional improvement, and safety profiles of the two guidance methods.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If ultrasound guidance is as effective as fluoroscopy, patients could receive comparable pain relief without radiation exposure.
How similar studies have gone: This study builds on growing evidence that ultrasound guidance can visualize soft tissues and nerves, with prior work suggesting comparable effectiveness to fluoroscopy in spinal injections.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 18 to 75 years. * Clinical diagnosis of lumbar radiculopathy characterized by radicular pain, paresthesia, or weakness in a dermatomal distribution. * Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-confirmed nerve root compression due to disc herniation or foraminal stenosis. * Failure to respond to at least 3 months of conservative medical treatment. * Radiculopathy affecting the L4, L5, or combined L5-S1 levels (where the primary symptomatic level can be reliably targeted) Exclusion Criteria: * Isolated S1 radiculopathy. * Significant spinal deformities, including scoliosis \>20° or spondylolisthesis \>Grade II. * History of prior lumbar spine surgery. * Bleeding disorders (International Normalized Ratio \[INR\] \>2.5). * Severe uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HbA1c \>8%). * Advanced cardiac, renal, or hepatic disease. * Active systemic infection or localized infection at the injection site. * Known allergies to corticosteroids or local anesthetics. * Presence of progressive neurological deficits or cauda equina syndrome. * Peripheral neuropathies mimicking radiculopathy. * Pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Severe psychiatric illness or cognitive impairment affecting study compliance.
Where it's running
-
Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University.
Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Ahmed S Alkotami, MD
- Email: ahmed.sami@med.tanta.edu.eg
- Phone: +201008928948
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
TFESI for neuropathic pain in lumbosacral radiculopathy
This study tests whether a transforaminal epidural steroid injection relieves neuropathic pain in adults with lumbosacral radiculopathy.
-
Three CT Signs of Nerve-Root Suffering in Low-Back Sciatica: How Often They Occur in Patients Referred for CT-Guided Nerve-Root Infiltration
This study tests whether three specific CT signs align with the nerve root causing symptoms in adults with low-back sciatica who are scheduled for CT-guided nerve-root infiltration.
-
How the way doctors explain epidural steroid injections affects sciatica pain outcomes
This trial will test whether explaining epidural steroid injections more positively or more neutrally changes pain for adults with lumbosacral radiculopathy who are candidates for injections.
-
Safety of a single transforaminal C-1101 injection versus saline for chronic sciatica
This will test whether a single transforaminal epidural injection of C-1101 is safe and well tolerated compared with sterile saline in adults with chronic sciatica who have not improved with conservative care.
-
Move-MORE: Online mindfulness, gentle movement, and motivational coaching for lumbosacral radiculopathy
This project tests whether an online program of mindfulness, gentle movement, and motivational interviewing can help adults with chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy (sciatica) reduce pain, improve function, and increase daily activity.
-
VER-01 for chronic painful lumbosacral radiculopathy
This phase 3 trial tests VER-01 against placebo to see if it can reduce pain in adults with chronic painful lumbosacral radiculopathy who have not found sufficient relief with non-opioid medications.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.