Testing the NUN biomarker to guide dry needling for myofascial low back pain.
Official title: Treatment Validation of an Ultrasound Imaging Biomarker for Myofascial Pain
Run by University of Pittsburgh · NCT07133139 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study will try to see if the NUN biomarker changes after dry needling and can predict who with chronic myofascial low back pain will feel better.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 20 Years to 70 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 80 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Pittsburgh Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | October 6, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2028 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | October 1, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07133139 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 20–70 with predominantly axial chronic low back pain for at least 3 months, a myofascial pain component on exam, average pain above 3/10, no prior dry needling, and meeting Quebec Task Force categories I–III are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with recent back surgery (within six months), active workers' compensation or litigation, new pain treatments within two weeks, clear neurologic radicular pain with sensory loss, unstable systemic illness, or those outside the age range are unlikely to benefit from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Adults with chronic axial low back pain and a myofascial pain component are randomized to receive either real or sham dry needling in a single-blinded design. Investigators measure the NUN biomarker with ultrasound imaging before and after a treatment session, perform pressure pain testing, and collect patient-reported pain scores. The main aims are to see whether the biomarker falls when pain improves, whether baseline biomarker levels predict who benefits, and whether changes differ between real and sham needling. All procedures require in-person visits for imaging and needling at the study site.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the biomarker could help identify which patients are likely to benefit from dry needling and allow clinicians to track treatment response more objectively.
How similar studies have gone: Prior trials of dry needling for myofascial pain have shown mixed results, and the NUN biomarker is a novel measure that has not been widely validated in large clinical cohorts.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Ages 20-70; * Predominantly axial LBP (meeting NIH definition of cLBP with daily pain for at least 3 months) with a MP component as determined by the standardized examination for MP; * Average pain score of \> 3/10, with low back pain being the primary pain site; * CLBP meeting Quebec Task Force Classification System categories I-III (from axial pain only to pain radiating beyond the knee without neurological signs). Constant radicular pain associated with sensory loss is likely a confounder to dry needling treatment success; * NO HISTORY of receiving dry needling, to improve the effectiveness of the blind; * Demonstration of healthcare seeking at some point for LBP. Exclusion Criteria: * Back surgery within the past six months; * Active workers' compensation or litigation claims, since these patients are more likely to have exaggerated pain behavior; * New pain treatments within 2 weeks of enrollment; * Any clinically unstable systemic illness or condition that is judged to interfere with the trial; * Non-ambulatory status; * Not able to complete the questionnaire * Currently pregnant or have intentions to become pregnant during the study.
Where it's running
-
Kauffman Medical Building
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Kang Kim, PhD — University of Pittsburgh
- Study coordinator: Ajay Wasan, MD, MSc
- Email: wasanad@upmc.edu
- Phone: 412-665-8048
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
A novel multi angular isometric lumbar exercise for chronic low back pain
This trial tests MAILE, a new lumbar exercise method, to see if it helps adults with nonspecific chronic low back pain more than standard lumbar stabilization and core exercises.
-
Understanding brain activity in chronic low back pain with movement and biometric profiling
This observational study tests brain activity patterns in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain who have neural mechanosensitivity, using wearable OPM-MEG during rest and movement, and compares them to healthy controls.
-
BDNF Levels in Spine Pain Patients and Disc Degeneration
This observational study tests whether blood levels of BDNF relate to disc degeneration and inflammation in people with chronic low back pain.
-
Pain phenotypes in people with chronic low back pain
This study tests whether people with chronic low back pain can be grouped into pain types (nociceptive, neuropathic, nociplastic, or mixed) based on a clinical algorithm.
-
Pain Reprocessing Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain
This study tests whether Pain Reprocessing Therapy can help adults with chronic low back pain by comparing it to a monitoring and education program over eight weeks.
-
VIVO 2nd GEN add-on for chronic low back pain with multimodal therapy
This pilot trial tests whether adding VIVO 2nd GEN auricular vagus nerve stimulation to standard multimodal pain therapy helps adults with chronic low back pain.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.