Tamsulosin dose change or switch to silodosin before catheter removal in men with BPH-related acute urinary retention
Official title: Tamsulosin 0.4 mg Continuation Versus Dose Escalation to 0.8 mg Versus Switch to Silodosin 8 mg for Trial Without Catheter After Acute Urinary Retention Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by Beni-Suef University · NCT07650968 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether continuing tamsulosin, increasing its dose, or switching to silodosin helps men with BPH-related acute urinary retention go without a catheter after seven days.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 4 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 50 Years and up |
| Sex | Men only |
| Enrollment | 378 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Beni-Suef University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Banī Suwayf, Beni Suweif Governorate) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 8, 2026 |
| Main results expected | May 2027 |
| Study ends | June 2027 |
| Registry record updated | June 16, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07650968 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Men aged 50 years or older with acute urinary retention due to BPH who were already taking tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily for at least 4 weeks and have been catheterized for the episode.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients not experiencing improvement in voiding after seven days or with contraindications to alpha-blockers may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized, parallel-arm study compares three alpha-blocker strategies in men aged 50 and older who developed painful acute urinary retention while already taking tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily. After initial catheterization, participants are assigned to continue tamsulosin 0.4 mg, escalate to 0.8 mg, or switch to silodosin 8 mg for seven days before a trial without catheter is attempted. Catheter removal occurs on Day 7 and success is defined by spontaneous voiding with acceptable voided volume, low post-void residual urine, and no need for re-catheterization, with follow-up through Day 30. Outcomes include catheter-free status, recurrent retention, urinary flow, symptoms, adverse events, and subsequent BPH-related interventions. The study aims to identify the most effective pre-removal strategy to achieve catheter-free voiding in this patient population.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could identify a management strategy that increases the likelihood of successful catheter-free voiding and reduces catheter-related complications.
How similar studies have gone: Prior delta studies in alpha-blocker optimization show mixed results; this is a novel direct comparison among continuation, dose-escalation, and switch in the specific pre-catheter-removal window.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Male patients aged 50 years or older. * Acute urinary retention requiring urethral catheterization. * Presumed acute urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic enlargement or benign prostatic obstruction. * Already receiving tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily for at least 4 weeks before the acute urinary retention episode. * Successful urethral catheterization at presentation. * Initial catheterized urine volume ≤1000 mL, with a clinical presentation consistent with painful acute urinary retention. * Prostate enlargement on ultrasound or clinical assessment consistent with benign prostatic hyperplasia or benign prostatic obstruction. * Ability to provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Known or suspected prostate cancer. * Previous prostate surgery. * Previous urethral stricture disease or urethral surgery. * Neurogenic bladder or known neurological disease affecting voiding. * Chronic urinary retention rather than acute painful retention. * Acute urinary retention due to non-BPH causes, including clot retention, bladder stone obstruction, acute prostatitis, urethral trauma, or drug-induced retention. * Severe urinary tract infection, sepsis, or fever at presentation. * Gross hematuria requiring irrigation. * Failed urethral catheterization or need for suprapubic catheterization. * Current use of silodosin, alfuzosin, doxazosin, terazosin, tadalafil, anticholinergics, beta-3 agonists, or other drugs that may significantly affect voiding. * Severe renal impairment requiring urgent intervention. * Symptomatic postural hypotension or recurrent syncope. * Known hypersensitivity to silodosin. * Severe hepatic impairment. * Inability to comply with follow-up.
Where it's running
-
Department of Urology- Beni-Suef University Hospitals
Banī Suwayf, Beni Suweif Governorate, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Hany F Badawy, MD
- Email: HANYFATHY86@GMAIL.COM
- Phone: +201149525028
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Tamsulosin With or Without Tadalafil for a Trial Without Catheter After Acute Urinary Retention
This study tests whether adding tadalafil to tamsulosin helps men with a first episode of acute urinary retention due to enlarged prostate pass urine without needing a catheter.
-
Sonablate HIFU Registry for Prostate Cancer and BPH
This registry collects real-world data from men treated with Sonablate HIFU to see how well it works and how it affects urinary and sexual function over the long term.
-
Tamsulosin alone vs. tamsulosin with tadalafil for troublesome urinary symptoms from enlarged prostate
This study tests whether adding tadalafil to tamsulosin helps men with BPH see better urinary symptoms and quality of life, using two tadalafil doses over 12 weeks.
-
MRI-DTI look at the urethral sphincter ring and prostate base shape
This imaging study tests how the male urethral internal sphincter ring appears on MRI-DTI and how it relates to prostate base morphology in men undergoing clinically indicated MRI.
-
Water Vapor Therapy vs Ejaculation-Sparing Enucleation for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
This study tests whether Water Vapor Thermal Therapy (Rezum) or an ejaculation-sparing enucleation procedure better helps sexually active men with bothersome BPH symptoms.
-
Water Vapor Therapy versus Ejaculation-Preserving HoLEP for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
This study compares Rezum water vapor therapy to ejaculation-preserving HoLEP in sexually active men with moderate-to-severe symptoms from BPH to see which preserves ejaculation better while easing urinary symptoms.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.