Surgical techniques for treating pain after cancer-related amputations
Official title: Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) Versus Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces (RPNI) Versus the Combined Technique of TMR-RPNI to Reduce Chronic and Phantom Limb Pain in Oncologic Amputees: A Randomized Control Pilot Study
Run by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center · NCT06840262 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing two different surgical methods to see if they can help cancer patients who have had amputations feel less pain in their residual limbs and reduce phantom limb pain.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 57 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Houston, Texas) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 10, 2020 |
| Main results expected | February 2, 2027 |
| Study ends | February 2, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | October 20, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06840262 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 and older who are undergoing an amputation for oncologic reasons and have suitable nerve structures for the surgical techniques.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who are under 18, unable to provide consent, or receiving amputations for non-oncologic reasons may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of two surgical techniques, targeted muscle re-innervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNI), both alone and in combination, to alleviate chronic residual limb and phantom limb pain in cancer patients who have undergone amputation. The study aims to determine the relative effectiveness of these techniques using validated pain assessment scales and to estimate pain medication use and prosthetic use among participants. Patients will be randomized into three groups to receive one of the surgical interventions, followed by follow-up assessments at 3, 6, and 12 months post-procedure.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could significantly reduce chronic pain and improve quality of life for cancer patients who have undergone amputations.
How similar studies have gone: While the techniques of TMR and RPNI are established, the combination approach being evaluated in this trial is relatively novel and has not been extensively tested in this specific patient population.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients greater than or equal to 18 years of age who are receiving an amputation for oncologic reasons * Patients with available mixed major nerves and donor motor nerves in the amputation stump or reconstructive tissue * Patients able to complete informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Patients under 18 years of age * Patients unable to give consent * Patients receiving an amputation for non-oncologic purposes * Patients with amputations performed for immediate palliation (life expectancy less than 3 months), as this technique takes a minimum of 3-6 months for effect * Patients with multiple limb amputations * Patients receiving nerve management in a delayed fashion (patients who have previously received an amputation and present with neuroma)
Where it's running
-
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Margaret S Roubaud — M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparing powered and mechanical prosthetic knees for K2-level amputees
This study is testing whether powered prosthetic knees work better than mechanical ones for K2-level amputees to help improve their mobility and make better choices for future prosthetic designs.
-
Effect of EMG sensor number and placement on control of below-elbow prosthetic arms
This project will test whether changing the number and placement of myoelectric sensors helps adults with below-elbow limb absence control a prosthetic arm better while wearing a real device.
-
Microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees for limited community ambulators with above-knee amputation.
This test will see if switching to a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee reduces fall-related health problems and improves walking speed, mobility, and quality of life for adults with above-knee amputations who are limited community ambulators compared with non-microprocessor knees.
-
Understanding the impact of powered prosthetics on walking for transfemoral amputees
This study is testing whether powered knee and ankle prosthetics can help transfemoral amputees walk better, especially when combined with special training.
-
Evaluation of a new myoelectric prosthesis for transradial amputees
This study is testing a new type of prosthetic arm that uses a special implant to help people with below-the-elbow amputations control it more easily and naturally.
-
Hand prosthesis usability and performance evaluation for people with upper limb absence
This study tests a new multi-articulating hand prosthesis to see if it performs better or differently than a participant’s own prosthesis.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.