Suction-assisted flexible RIRS versus PCNL for 2–3 cm kidney stones
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery With a Tip-Flexible Suction Access Sheath to the Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of 2-3 cm Unilateral Renal Stones
Run by Changhai Hospital · NCT07058402 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study will test whether a suction-assisted flexible RIRS removes 2–3 cm kidney stones as effectively and safely as standard PCNL in adults.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 308 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Changhai Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | April 30, 2026 |
| Study ends | June 30, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | July 10, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07058402 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18–80 with a single unilateral kidney stone measuring 2–3 cm on CT, ASA I–III, who can give informed consent and comply with follow-up are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with abnormal urinary tract anatomy, uncontrolled urinary infection, absolute contraindications to RIRS or PCNL, urgent surgical needs, or inability to follow the protocol are unlikely to benefit or be eligible.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This multicenter randomized trial will enroll 308 adults with a single 2–3 cm kidney stone and randomize them to either retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) using a tip-flexible suction access sheath (TFS-UAS) or standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The TFS-UAS is designed to improve access to renal calyces, reduce intrarenal pressure, and evacuate stone fragments by continuous suction to potentially increase stone clearance during RIRS. The primary endpoint is stone-free rate at 3 months measured by CT, and secondary outcomes include postoperative infection rates, changes in hemoglobin and procalcitonin, hospital stay duration, and pain scores. Procedures and follow-up will be carried out at four tertiary centers in China with standardized protocols.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, suction-assisted RIRS could offer a less invasive way to clear medium-sized kidney stones with similar or fewer complications and shorter hospital stays compared with PCNL.
How similar studies have gone: PCNL is an established effective treatment for 2–3 cm stones while conventional RIRS has shown lower stone-free rates for larger stones; suction-assisted sheaths are a novel modification with limited prior clinical data.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age between 18 and 80 years 2. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I-III 3. Single renal stone with a diameter between 2-3 cm confirmed by non-contrast CT scan 4. Signed written informed consent and willingness to comply with study procedures Exclusion Criteria: 1. Anatomical abnormalities of the urinary tract (e.g., horseshoe kidney, ileal conduit) 2. Uncontrolled urinary tract infection 3. Absolute contraindications for RIRS or PCNL 4. Inability to understand or complete study documentation 5. Failure to follow study protocol or attend follow-up 6. Patients requiring urgent rescue or at high risk for irreversible harm during surgery 7. Patients who voluntarily withdraw from the study
Where it's running
-
Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Xiaofeng Gao
- Email: gxfdoc@sina.com
- Phone: +86-21-13601600968
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Suction vs Conventional Ureteral Access Sheaths in Kidney Stone Surgery
This study tests whether using a suction ureteral access sheath during RIRS helps adults clear stones more often and potentially reduces operative time and infections compared with a conventional sheath.
-
Observation vs Upfront Surgery for Asymptomatic Kidney Stones in Children and Adults
This trial tests whether watching asymptomatic kidney stones or performing upfront surgery is better for reducing life disruption in patients aged 6 and older.
-
Tract Closure with Hemostatic Agent in PCNL
This trial tests whether applying a hemostatic agent during tract closure in PCNL helps reduce blood loss compared with balloon tamponade alone.
-
Suction to collapse the kidney's collecting system after RIRS (retrograde intrarenal surgery)
This trial will test whether actively suctioning the kidney's collecting system at the end of RIRS reduces early postoperative pain and infections for adults having kidney stone removal.
-
Early versus delayed shock wave treatment for leftover kidney stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy
This trial tests whether doing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) early or waiting longer after PCNL helps clear leftover kidney stone fragments ≤15 mm with fewer complications.
-
Compare two suction ureteroscope devices for kidney stones (FANS vs CVAC)
This study tests whether two new suction-enabled ureteroscopes (FANS and CVAC) lead to better stone clearance for adults with small to medium kidney stones compared to each other.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.