Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 30 to 45

Stecco Fascial Manipulation vs Muscle Energy Technique for Sacroiliac Joint Pain

Official title: Effects of Stecco Fascial Manipulation Versus Muscle Energy Technique on Pain Pressure Threshold, Range of Motion and Disability Among Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

Run by Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences · NCT07723014 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This trial tests whether Stecco fascia therapy or Muscle Energy Technique better reduces pain and improves movement in adults with sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

More Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages30 Years to 45 Years
SexAll
Enrollment52 (estimated)
SponsorLahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province)
StatusRecruiting
StartedMay 1, 2026
Main results expectedJuly 30, 2026
Study endsOctober 10, 2026
Registry record updatedJuly 23, 2026
Trial IDNCT07723014 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults aged 30–45 with clinically diagnosed SIJ dysfunction, positive SIJ tests, and pain lasting less than 3 months.

Probably not a fit

Patients who do not respond to physiological therapy or have exclusionary conditions may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

Adults aged 30–45 with sacroiliac joint dysfunction are randomly assigned to receive either Stecco fascial manipulation or Muscle Energy Technique. The study measures pain pressure threshold, range of motion, and functional disability to compare the two approaches over a four-week period with two sessions per week. It aims to provide evidence on which conservative physiotherapy method more effectively relieves SIJ-related pain and improves function. The findings could help clinicians tailor rehab plans and potentially shorten treatment time for SIJD. This trial adds to the growing but still limited literature on fascial manipulation and MET in SIJD.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience greater pain relief and improved joint mobility with a more efficient rehabilitation approach.

How similar studies have gone: There is limited published evidence on Stecco fascial manipulation and MET for SIJ dysfunction; some prior studies suggest potential benefits but data are not definitive.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:Age between 30-45.

* Both male and female.
* Participants with a medical diagnosis of SIJD (posterior innominate and anterior innominate), pain and tenderness at PSIS, Sacral Sulcus, Ilia.
* Pain in the paraspinal muscles, gluteal or groin region, and radiating to either leg.
* 3 Positive special tests for SIJD (Faber test, Thigh thrust test, Distraction test, compression test, and Gaenslen test).
* Pain lasting for less than 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Subjects with leg length discrepancy.
* Subjects with any pathology observed in the lower extremity.
* Subjects with pre-diagnosed tumors of the hip and spine.
* Pregnancy.
* Subjects with any history of recent trauma involving the lower limb.

Where it's running

  • Lahore General Hospital
    Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.