Post-Market real-world test of TRAQ SIJ fusion in adults with SI joint pain
Official title: An Open Label, Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Post-Market Clinical Study Using TRAQ™ for Minimally Invasive Posterior Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
Run by PainTEQ, LLC · NCT07547215 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests how well the TRAQ System works in real-world patients with sacroiliac joint pain who have not had adequate relief from non-surgical care.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 21 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 100 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | PainTEQ, LLC Industry-sponsored |
| Locations | 1 site (Tucson, Arizona) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 27, 2026 |
| Main results expected | July 2027 |
| Study ends | December 2028 |
| Registry record updated | June 15, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07547215 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 21 or older with chronic nonradicular SIJ pain for at least 6 months who have not responded to non-surgical treatment and meet specific clinical criteria for SIJ dysfunction.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who do not experience improvements in pain or function after TRAQ-based treatment, or who have contraindications to the procedure, may derive no benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This observational study evaluates the real-world performance, safety, and effectiveness of the TRAQ System for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion. Adults 21 and older with chronic SI joint pain, who meet specific clinical criteria, receive the TRAQ-related intervention using a bone allograft as part of routine care. The study collects data on pain, function, and safety outcomes in a non-randomized, real-world setting at the Pain Institute of Southern Arizona. No randomization or blinding is described, and the focus is on post-market experience and patient outcomes over time.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience meaningful reductions in SIJ pain and improvements in function after TRAQ-based fusion.
How similar studies have gone: Previous post-market experiences with similar SIJ fusion approaches have shown potential benefits in real-world settings, but this exact TRAQ-based approach is being evaluated in this observational study.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
To be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all the following criteria, as determined by the Investigator:
1. Age and Body Mass Index (BMI)
1. Adult patients aged ≥ 21 years at screening.
2. BMI ≤ 40.
2. Chronic SIJ Related Pain
1. Has experienced low back and/or buttock pain for at least 6 months that has been inadequately responsive to non surgical management.
2. Has experienced nonradicular pain that is maximal below the L5 vertebrae, localized over the posterior SIJ, and consistent with SIJ pain.
3. Diagnosis of SIJ Dysfunction
a. Has a diagnosis of SIJ dysfunction (degenerative sacroiliitis or SIJ disruption) based on ALL of the following: i. A positive Fortin's finger test; and ii. Pain elicited on at least three (3) of five (5) SIJ specific physical examination maneuvers (FABER test, Gaenslen's test, Distraction, Thigh Thrust, Compression); and iii. At least 75% reduction in pain, with associated improvement in previously painful maneuvers, for the expected duration of action following two (2) image guided, contrast enhanced intra articular diagnostic SIJ injections, performed on separate visits using anesthetics with different durations of action; and iv. Completion of at least one (1) therapeutic intra articular SIJ injection (e.g., corticosteroid injection) within the past 12 months.
4. Baseline Disability and Pain Severity
a. Baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score ≥30%; and b. Baseline SI joint pain score of ≥60 mm on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
5. Treatment Decision a. The treating physician has independently determined that the TRAQ procedure is an appropriate treatment option for the subject's SIJ dysfunction in the course of routine clinical care, and the subject has agreed to undergo this treatment.
6. Informed Consent and Compliance
1. Is willing and capable of providing written informed consent; and
2. Is willing and able to comply with all study related requirements, procedures, and follow up visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects must meet none of the following criteria to be eligible for participation in this study, as determined by the Investigator:
1. Pain Source Uncertainty
a. Inability to confirm, in the Investigator's clinical judgment, that the subject's primary pain generator is the sacroiliac joint.
2. Alternative Primary Spine Pathology
a. Presence of severe low back pain attributable to other spinal pathology, including but not limited to lumbar disc degeneration, lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spondylolisthesis, lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar facet degeneration, or lumbar vertebral body fracture.
3. Other Sacroiliac Pathology a. Presence of known sacroiliac joint pathology other than degenerative SIJ dysfunction, including inflammatory sacroiliitis (e.g., ankylosing spondylitis or other HLA associated spondyloarthropathies), tumor, infection, acute fracture, or crystal arthropathy.
4. Non SIJ Pain Syndromes
a. History of coccydynia or prior coccygectomy, endometriosis, cluneal neuralgia, or pudendal neuralgia.
5. Recent Sacral Interventions
a. Prior sacral radiofrequency ablation performed within 6 months prior to enrollment.
6. Recent Pelvic Trauma
a. History of major pelvic trauma within 12 months prior to enrollment.
7. Severe Osteoporosis
a. Prior diagnosis or suspicion of severe osteoporosis, defined as a prior bone mineral density T score of \< -2.5 or a history of osteoporotic fracture.
8. Medications Affecting Bone or Soft Tissue Healing
a. Current use of medications known to adversely affect bone quality or soft tissue healing, as determined by the Investigator.
9. Anatomic Constraints
a. Anatomic anomalies or defects that, in the Investigator's opinion, would preclude safe or biomechanically appropriate device placement.
10. Systemic Inflammatory or Rheumatologic Disease
a. Presence of a chronic inflammatory rheumatologic condition, such as rheumatoid arthritis.
11. Centralized Pain Syndromes
a. Current diagnosis of fibromyalgia.
12. Infection Risk
a. Evidence of current local or systemic infection that would increase surgical risk.
13. High-Dose Opioid Therapy (≥90 MME/day)
a. Current use of systemic opioid analgesics at Screening/Baseline with an average daily dose ≥90 morphine milligram equivalents (MME/day), based on medication reconciliation (prescription records and subject report) and standard MME conversion factors.
14. Current Nicotine Use (Self-Reported)
a. Self-reported use of any nicotine-containing products (including smoking, vaping/e-cigarettes, cigars, pipes, smokeless tobacco, nicotine pouches, and nicotine replacement products) within 6 weeks prior to Screening/Baseline.
15. Secondary Gain or Litigation
a. Currently receiving or actively seeking workers' compensation or disability benefits or involved in injury related litigation.
16. Pregnancy
a. Currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant within two (2) years following enrollment, as self reported.
17. Vulnerable Populations
a. Individuals who are prisoners or wards of the state.
18. Substance Abuse
a. Known or suspected active drug or alcohol abuse, including opioid misuse.
19. Psychiatric Conditions
a. Diagnosed psychiatric disorder (e.g., schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, personality disorder) that, in the Investigator's judgment, could interfere with study participation.
20. Concurrent Interventional Research
a. Current participation in another clinical trial.
21. Neurologic Conditions Affecting Rehabilitation
a. Presence of a significant neurologic disorder that would interfere with participation in physical therapy or post procedural rehabilitation.
22. Other Confounding Medical Conditions a. Any other medical condition or pain condition not intended to be treated in this study that, in the Investigator's judgment, could interfere with study procedures, accurate pain reporting, or interpretation of study endpoints.
Where it's running
-
Pain Institute of Southern Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Lalit Venkatesan, PhD
- Email: lalit.venkatesan@painteq.com
- Phone: 18552487246
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Stecco Fascial Manipulation vs Muscle Energy Technique for Sacroiliac Joint Pain
This trial tests whether Stecco fascia therapy or Muscle Energy Technique better reduces pain and improves movement in adults with sacroiliac joint dysfunction.
-
Core stability vs hip strengthening for sacroiliac joint dysfunction
A small randomized trial tests whether core stability exercises or hip strengthening exercises better reduce pain and improve function for people with unilateral sacroiliac joint dysfunction.
-
Autogenic vs. Reciprocal Inhibition Techniques for SI Joint Dysfunction
The study tests two muscle-lengthening techniques (autogenic inhibition and reciprocal inhibition) to see if they reduce pain and improve function and walking in adults with sacroiliac joint dysfunction.
-
LINQ fusion for SI joint dysfunction compared with standard medical care
This study tests whether the LINQ fusion procedure can reduce SI joint pain better than conventional medical management in adults with chronic sacroiliac joint dysfunction.
-
See how well iFuse TORQ TNT works for pelvic fragility fractures
This study tests the iFuse TORQ TNT implant in older adults with pelvic fragility fractures to see if real-world use leads to better outcomes.
-
Combined Mobilization with Movement and Kinetic Control Training for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
This study tests whether combining Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement with Kinetic Control Training helps people with sacroiliac joint dysfunction reduce pain and improve movement and function.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.