Smart lung support for adults on a ventilator in the ICU
Official title: Intelligent Lung Support in the Intensive Care Unit (IntelliLung): An Observational, Prospective, Multicentre Study
Run by Technische Universität Dresden · NCT06595602 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This observational project will test the IntelliLung AI decision support system in adults receiving invasive mechanical ventilation to see if its recommended ventilator settings match what clinicians actually choose.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 530 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Technische Universität Dresden Academic / other |
| Locations | 5 sites (Dresden and 4 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 25, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 2027 |
| Study ends | December 2027 |
| Registry record updated | July 2, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06595602 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults (≥18 years) who are invasively mechanically ventilated, expected to remain intubated for more than 24 hours, and who (or whose proxy) can provide informed consent.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients expected to die within 48 hours, those on closed-loop ventilation modes, participants in interventional mechanical ventilation trials, or persons unable to consent (including prisoners) are unlikely to receive benefit from participation.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This multicenter observational effort runs the IntelliLung artificial-intelligence decision support software in parallel with routine care for adults on invasive mechanical ventilation, including patients with and without ARDS and those receiving extracorporeal lung support. The system generates ventilator-setting recommendations while clinicians retain final decision-making authority; researchers will record the clinician-selected settings and the AI recommendations. The main analysis quantifies concordance between clinician settings and IntelliLung recommendations and explores factors associated with agreement or disagreement. Data are collected across participating centers in Germany, Italy, and Poland to describe real-world performance and acceptability.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, IntelliLung could help standardize ventilator settings and reduce ventilator-induced lung injury, potentially improving patient outcomes.
How similar studies have gone: Prior feasibility and algorithm-development work on AI-based ventilator decision support has shown promise in simulations and small single-center series, but robust multicenter clinical outcome data are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male and female patients, age ⪰18 years 2. Written informed consent 3. Invasively mechanically ventilated patients expected to be intubated for more than 24 hours. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Expected to die within ≤48 hours 2. Participation in an interventional mechanical ventilation trial 3. Mechanical Ventilation with a closed-loop ventilation mode 4. Persons dependent on the sponsor and/or investigator 5. Subjects who are currently imprisoned or otherwise in confinement ordered by law or other official authorities
Where it's running
-
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
Dresden, Germany Recruiting -
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Warsaw, Poland
Warsaw, Poland Recruiting -
Critical Care Department, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació I Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT-CERCA), Sabadell, Spain
Sabadell, Spain Recruiting -
Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
Genova, Italy Not yet recruiting -
Department of Intensive Care Medicine. Hospital Universitario de La Princesa. Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Madrid, Spain Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Jakob Wittenstein — epartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
- Study coordinator: Jakob Wittenstein, M.D.
- Email: jakob.wittenstein@ukdd.de
- Phone: +49 351 458 19777
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Pulse Wave vs Saline Bolus EIT to measure lung perfusion in ARDS
This study tests whether pulse wave EIT or saline bolus EIT can best show lung blood flow in ARDS patients on mechanical ventilation.
-
Computed inspiratory muscle pressure to monitor inspiratory effort during pressure-targeted assist/control ventilation
This study tests a noninvasive computed pressure method (cPmus) to see if it matches the traditional esophageal pressure method for measuring inspiratory effort in adults on pressure-targeted ventilation with spontaneous breathing.
-
Noninvasive estimate of inspiratory effort to monitor pressure support ventilation
This study tests whether a noninvasive computed inspiratory muscle pressure (cPmus) can match the traditional esophageal pressure method for adults on pressure support ventilation.
-
Driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP vs standard PEEP during upper abdominal surgery
In this randomized trial, adults at higher risk of breathing problems after upper abdominal surgery will try a personalized PEEP level based on the lowest driving pressure and compare it to a fixed PEEP of 5 cmH2O to see if it lowers postoperative lung complications.
-
Inspiratory Effort and Dyspnea During Assisted Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults
This study tests how different patient breathing efforts relate to breathlessness in adults on assisted mechanical ventilation.
-
FCV vs VC—Obese Adults Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
In obese adults having laparoscopic surgery, researchers will see if flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) works better than volume-controlled ventilation with autoflow (VC-AF) at keeping airway pressures and lung energy lower.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.