Sequential versus initial combination treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, and Non-inferiority Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Sequential to Initial Combination Therapy in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine · NCT06968962 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether starting with one drug and adding the second later works as well as starting both ambrisentan and tadalafil together for adults with PAH.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 376 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | chemotherapy |
| Locations | 1 site (Hangzhou, Zhejiang) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 14, 2025 |
| Main results expected | May 2028 |
| Study ends | December 2028 |
| Registry record updated | July 29, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06968962 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18–80 years weighing ≥40 kg with idiopathic, heritable, or certain associated PAH (WHO FC I–III), low- or intermediate-risk by 2022 ESC/ERS criteria, and right heart catheterization meeting hemodynamic thresholds are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with high-risk or WHO FC IV PAH, recent prostanoid or chronic PAH therapy use, or those who cannot meet the hemodynamic or age/weight criteria are unlikely to benefit from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This multicenter, randomized, double-blind non-inferiority trial compares sequential versus initial combination therapy using ambrisentan and tadalafil in adults with PAH. Participants are WHO functional class I–III, judged low- or intermediate-risk by 2022 ESC/ERS criteria, must have right heart catheterization–confirmed PAH, and must not have recent chronic PAH therapy. The primary endpoint is change in 6-minute walk distance at 12 months, with risk re-stratification every 4 months using COMPERA 2.0 and blinded escalation to dual therapy if patients do not meet low-risk criteria. Placebo/mimic tablets are used so patients, investigators, and pharmacists manage blinded escalation without revealing the original assignment.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, it could allow many patients to start with one medication and add a second only when needed, minimizing unnecessary drug exposure and side effects while maintaining exercise capacity.
How similar studies have gone: Prior trials such as AMBITION showed benefit of initial ambrisentan plus tadalafil over monotherapy, but direct randomized non-inferiority comparisons of sequential versus upfront combination therapy are limited, making this partially novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age between 18 to 80 years and weight ≥ 40 kg. 2. WHO functional classification I-III. 3. Diagnosed with PAH caused or related to the following: 1\) Idiopathic PAH 2) Hereditary PAH 3) Associated PAH: 1. Connective tissue diseases (e.g., scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematosus, mixed connective tissue disease, etc.) 2. Drug or toxin exposure 3. Corrected congenital heart diseases for more than 1 year (e.g., atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, and patent ductus arteriosus) 4. Risk stratification assessed as low-risk or intermediate-risk according to the 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines. 5\. Right heart catheterization meets the following criteria (end-expiratory data, original waveform must be retained for quality control): 1\) Mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 25 mmHg 2) Pulmonary vascular resistance ≥ 3 Wood units 3) Pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) ≤ 15 mmHg 4) Cardiac output measurement requirements: thermal dilution or direct Fick method; indirect Fick method does not meet study criteria. 6\. Pulmonary function tests meet the following criteria: 1) Total lung capacity (TLC) ≥ 60% of the predicted normal value; 2) Forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) ≥ 55% of the predicted normal value; 3) DLCO\_SB ≥ 40% of the predicted normal value. 7. Baseline 6MWD more than 100 meters repeated twice at screening (measured at least 4 hours apart, but no longer than 1 week), and both values are within 15% of each other (calculated from the highest value) 8. In a resting state, without supplemental oxygen, arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) ≥ 88%. 9\. No participation in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation training programs within 12 weeks prior to the screening visit. 10\. Females of childbearing potential must agree to use contraception until the end of the study. 11\. No participation in clinical studies involving other investigational drugs or devices throughout the study duration. 12\. Ability to understand the informed consent form and sign it. Exclusion Criteria: 1\. Other types of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) 1. Other types of PAH, such as HIV-related PAH, schistosomiasis-related PAH, etc. 2. Pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with portal hypertension 3. Pulmonary vein occlusive disease or pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis 2. Group 4 PH, e.g. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension 3. Group 2 PH, i.e., PH associated with left heart disease 4. Group 3 PH, i.e., PH associated with lung disease or hypoxia 5. Group 5 PH, i.e., PH with unclear mechanisms or multi-mechanism 6. PAH Therapy 1\) Subjects who have received PAH therapy (such as PDE5 inhibitors, ERAs, or chronic prostacyclin therapy) within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit. 2\) Subjects who have ever received ERA therapy (e.g., macitentan) or PDE5 inhibitor therapy (e.g., sildenafil) and discontinued due to tolerance issues unrelated to liver dysfunction. 3\) Subjects known to have an allergy to the investigational product, its metabolites, or excipients. 7\. Other Therapies 1. Subjects who have received intravenous inotropes (e.g., dobutamine) within 2 weeks prior to the screening visit. 2. Subjects receiving protease inhibitors, systemic ketoconazole, or systemic itraconazole therapy. 3. Subjects receiving strong CYP3A4 inducers (e.g., rifampicin). 4. Subjects who have received unstable doses of calcium channel blockers or HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit (eligible subjects must not have changed doses within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit). 5. Subjects with a history of angina or who have received long-acting or short-acting nitrate treatment within the 12 weeks prior to the visit. 8\. Laboratory Tests at Screening 1) Serum ALT or AST laboratory values \> 2 times the upper limit of normal at screening. 2) Serum bilirubin laboratory values \> 1.5 times the upper limit of normal at screening. 3) Severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 45 mL/min/1.73m3) at screening. 9\. Medical History/Current Medical Conditions 1. Severe liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh Class C, with or without cirrhosis) at screening. 2. Significant anemia in the opinion of the investigator. 3. History of bleeding disorders or significant active peptic ulcers. 4. Uncontrolled hypertension (≥ 180/110 mmHg) at screening. 5. Severe hypotension (\< 90/50 mmHg) at screening. 6. Myocardial infarction within 3 months prior to screening. 7. Clinically significant aortic or mitral valve disease, constrictive pericarditis, restrictive or congestive cardiomyopathy, life-threatening arrhythmias, significant left ventricular dysfunction, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, symptomatic coronary artery disease, autonomic hypotension, or circulatory failure. 8. History of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. 9. Hereditary degenerative retinal disease (e.g., retinitis pigmentosa). 10. Significant fluid retention in the opinion of the investigator. 11. Subjects with cardiovascular, liver, kidney, hematologic, gastrointestinal, immune, endocrine, metabolic, or central nervous system diseases that the investigator believes may adversely affect the subject's safety and/or the efficacy of the investigational product or significantly impact the subject's lifespan. 12. History of malignant tumors within the past 5 years, except for those with local, non-metastatic basal cell carcinoma, cervical carcinoma in situ, or prostate cancer who are not anticipated to receive radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and/or surgical interventions or initiate hormonal therapy during the study period. 13. Pregnant or breastfeeding female subjects. 14. Subjects with demonstrated poor compliance. 15. History of alcohol abuse or illicit drug use within 1 year. 16. Participation in clinical studies involving another investigational drug or device within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit. Subjects who fail inclusion/exclusion criteria may be re-screened once.
Where it's running
-
The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Zongye Cai, MD, PhD
- Email: z.cai@zju.edu.cn
- Phone: +8618258236820
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Sleep problems in PAH patients: how sleep breathing relates to PAH outcomes
This study tests how sleep-disordered breathing and nocturnal oxygen changes relate to outcomes in adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
-
Impact of ambient air vs nasal liquid oxygen on exercise performance in pulmonary vascular disease
This study tests whether using nasal liquid oxygen during a 6-minute walk test changes how far patients with PAH or CTEPH can walk compared to breathing room air.
-
Liquid oxygen vs ambient air during a 6-minute walk in people with pulmonary vascular disease
This study tests whether walking with liquid oxygen at about 4 L/min helps or hinders distance walked compared with walking on room air in adults with PAH or CTEPH living in Switzerland.
-
Treprostinil inhalation powder for PAH patients switching from selexipag
This study tests whether inhaled treprostinil (LIQ861) is safe and tolerable for adults with PAH who are moving from oral selexipag to inhaled therapy.
-
Escalation options for PAH patients already on dual therapy
This trial tests whether adding a prostacyclin pathway drug or increasing sildenafil dose helps PAH patients at intermediate-to-high risk who aren’t at low risk despite dual therapy.
-
Vasoactive Agents in Pulmonary Hypertension Crisis
This trial tests whether dopamine, norepinephrine, or epinephrine can safely and effectively help people with a pulmonary hypertension crisis who are in the hospital.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.