Self-guided pelvic-floor device plus rehab vs standard pelvic rehab for stress incontinence
Official title: Prospective and Comparative Evaluation of a Medical Device Composed of a Perineal Probe Connected to a Mobile Application in the Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Run by Nantes University Hospital · NCT06285292 · Data updated 2026-11-12
A device-assisted program with 3 monthly short device sessions plus 2 rehab visits is being tested to see if it works as well as the standard pelvic-perineal rehabilitation for women with stress urinary incontinence.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 60 Years |
| Sex | Women only |
| Enrollment | 138 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Nantes University Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Nantes) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 25, 2024 |
| Main results expected | November 25, 2026 |
| Study ends | November 25, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | June 25, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06285292 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18–60 with moderate to very severe stress or mixed stress urinary incontinence and a QoL score at or below 70, who can use a smartphone and read French.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with mild incontinence or QoL scores above 70 may not benefit from this approach.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This prospective study compares two approaches for managing stress urinary incontinence in adults aged 18–60. One group receives the current gold-standard pelvic-perineal rehabilitation (15 sessions) while the other uses a pelvic-floor medical device at home three times weekly for 15 minutes over three months, in addition to two in-person rehabilitation sessions. Participants can adjust their home program based on symptoms. The trial is conducted by physiotherapists specializing in pelvic rehabilitation and is sponsored by Nantes University Hospital with collaboration from FIZIMED, recruiting through healthcare professionals. Outcome measures will likely focus on symptom severity and quality of life.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients may achieve similar relief from symptoms with fewer in-person visits and greater independence.
How similar studies have gone: Previous research has explored self-training devices for pelvic-floor rehabilitation with mixed results; this study tests non-inferiority to standard care.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with moderate, severe or very severe stress urinary incontinence or mixed stress urinary incontinence (according to ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire score: moderate (6-12), severe (13-18) and very severe (19-21)) * Patient aged between 18 and 60 * Patient with a quality of life score measured with the I-QoL questionnaire less than or equal to 70 (score measured from 0 to 100, with poor quality of life: 0-35; average quality of life: 36-70; good quality of life: 71-100) * Not to have given birth in the last 6 months (to avoid post-partum physiological recovery) * Signed informed consent * Effective contraception throughout the study (declarative) * Patient must have a smartphone running at least Android 7 and iOS 12 * Patient must be able to read and write French Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with mild stress urinary incontinence or mixed stress urinary incontinence (ICIQ-UI SF score: mild (1-5)) * Patient with a quality of life score above 70 (according to the I-QoL questionnaire: good quality of life: 71-100) * Patient undergoing other pelvic-perineal rehabilitation during the study period * Patients with neurological disease or congenital malformation, surgically or medically treated urinary incontinence or prolapse, perineal hypoesthesia or local conditions prohibiting the use of an intravaginal catheter * Infection of the bladder or vagina, or any symptoms associated with infection (itching, pain on urination or fever) * Contraindications to the use of the medical device * Anatomy making catheter placement difficult or impossible; in the case of prolapse, specialist advice is recommended. * Hemorrhage * Patients with genitourinary cancer (within the last 5 years) * Patients with extra-urethral "incontinence" (fistula, ectopic ureter) * Patients with severe urinary retention * Patient with vesico-ureteral reflux * Patients with hypoactive bladder * In case of peripheral denervation in the pelvic-perineal area, specialist advice is recommended * Patients wearing a sacral neuromodulation device * Patients in an exclusion period (determined by a previous or current study) * Impossibility of giving the subject clear information (subject in an emergency situation, difficulties in understanding the subject, etc.) * Patient under court protection * Patient under guardianship or curatorship * Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test) * Breastfeeding (as the hormonal impregnation caused by breastfeeding has a negative impact on perineal tone) * Use of Huawei and Oppo smartphones
Where it's running
-
CHU de Nantes
Nantes, France Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Thibault THUBERT, PHD
- Email: thibault.thubert@chu-nantes.fr
- Phone: 02.53.48.24.43
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Urinary incontinence in older adults: how leakage and bladder residuals relate to frailty
This study tests whether the severity of urinary leakage and leftover urine after voiding are linked to frailty and other geriatric outcomes in older adults visiting a urology clinic.
-
Compare two pelvic floor stimulation devices to see which helps with urinary incontinence in women
We’re testing if electromagnetic chair therapy can help women with mixed urinary incontinence as well as standard electrostimulation with biofeedback.
-
Educational video before urodynamic testing to see if it lowers anxiety
This study tests whether watching a short educational video before urodynamics helps reduce anxiety for women undergoing the test.
-
Improving Uroflowmetry: Do Pre-Procedure Reminders Help Women Undergoing Urodynamics
This study tests whether sending reminder calls before a urodynamics test helps women with pelvic floor disorders feel more prepared and less anxious, and whether it makes the procedure go more smoothly.
-
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Improve Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
This study tests whether adding telehealth sex therapy to pelvic floor physical therapy helps men recover sexual function after prostate cancer treatment.
-
Multimodal approach to reduce urinary incontinence in young female athletes
A multimodal program combining pelvic health education and core stability training is tested to see if it reduces urinary incontinence in young nulliparous female athletes.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.