Risk factors for mesh infection after abdominal wall reconstruction
Official title: Risk Factors for Mesh-Related Infection in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Single-Centre Prospective Observational Cohort Study
Run by Minia University · NCT07725718 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests which factors put adults at risk for mesh infection after abdominal wall reconstruction using different mesh types.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 420 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Minia University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Minya, Minya Governorate) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 15, 2026 |
| Main results expected | November 15, 2027 |
| Study ends | August 15, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | August 18, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07725718 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 18 years and older undergoing elective or urgent abdominal wall reconstruction with synthetic, biosynthetic, or biological mesh for ventral, incisional, parastomal, or complex defects.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients without major risk factors or those receiving standard care may have no specific benefit beyond existing knowledge.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a prospective, single-center observational cohort study at Minia University in Egypt. Consecutive adults undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction with mesh will be enrolled and followed for 12 months to identify independent risk factors for mesh-related infection within 90 days. Outcomes include infection timing, microbiology, need for mesh salvage or removal, and the occurrence of surgical site events, with an exploratory risk-stratification model to aid future risk prediction. No experimental interventions are applied; management follows standard unit practice. Enrollment spans 12 months, with complete follow-up for each participant lasting 12 months after surgery.</row>
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the study could help doctors identify patients at higher risk for mesh infection and tailor perioperative care to reduce infection rates.
How similar studies have gone: Previous research has shown variability in mesh infection risk factors, but prospective data with standardized definitions remain limited, making this study relatively novel in its setting.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged ≥18 years. * Undergoing elective or urgent abdominal wall reconstruction with implantation of synthetic, biosynthetic or biological mesh for a ventral, incisional, parastomal or complex abdominal wall defect. * Able and willing to provide written informed consent and to attend scheduled follow-up. Exclusion Criteria: * Suture-only repair without mesh. * Inguinal or femoral (groin) hernia repair. * Active systemic sepsis or established intra-abdominal mesh infection at the time of index surgery. * Mesh placed solely for a non-reconstructive indication (e.g. temporary abdominal closure or planned re-look without definitive reconstruction). * Estimated life expectancy \< 12 months or inability to complete the minimum follow-up. * Patient declines participation.
Where it's running
-
Minia University Hospitals - Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University
Minya, Minya Governorate, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Saleh K Saleh, MD — Minia University
- Study coordinator: Saleh K Saleh, MD
- Email: salehkhairy@mu.edu.eg
- Phone: 01201765401
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Robot-assisted ventral hernia repair vs open repair for large abdominal wall defects
This trial tests whether robotically assisted repair of large ventral or incisional hernias leads to better outcomes than the traditional open repair.
-
Hernia Sac Flap Coverage of Mesh in Complex Bony-Edged Ventral Hernias
We’re testing whether using the patient’s own hernia sac as a living flap underneath the mesh helps healing after complex ventral hernia repair when part of the edge is bone.
-
Comparing two surgical techniques for ventral hernia repair
This study tests which of two surgical methods for fixing ventral hernias, eTEP or IPOM, helps patients recover better and have fewer problems after surgery.
-
Parastomal Hernia After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Do Radiology Findings Match Quality of Life
We’re testing how often parastomal hernias appear and change on CT scans after colorectal cancer surgery with a permanent end colostomy, and whether these findings relate to patients’ quality of life.
-
Patient-specific biomechanical modeling of incisional hernias with AI and finite element analysis
Researchers will test a personalized computer model of the abdominal wall for adults with incisional hernias using anonymized CT data and AI to see how the hernia shapes relate to tissue mechanics.
-
Antibiotic Tissue Penetration in Head and Neck Infection and Reconstructive Surgery
This study tests how well common antibiotics reach head and neck tissue in adults with neck infections or during nasal reconstructive surgery using a flap.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.