Removing the crown during non-surgical treatment for peri-implantitis.

Effectiveness of Non-Surgical Mechanical Therapy of Peri-Implantitis With or Without Prosthetic Crown Removal: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Not applicable Interventional G. d'Annunzio University · NCT07391202

This study will test whether taking off the prosthetic crown from an affected implant helps non-surgical cleaning work better for people with peri-implantitis.

Quick facts

PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional
Enrollment36 (estimated)
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
SponsorG. d'Annunzio University Academic / other
Locations1 site (Chieti, Chieti)
Trial IDNCT07391202 on ClinicalTrials.gov

What this trial studies

This single-blind randomized trial will compare non-surgical mechanical therapy performed with the crown left in place versus after crown removal for implants affected by peri-implantitis. Clinical and radiographic measures will be collected at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months, with mean peri-implant probing depth as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include gingival recession, radiographic marginal bone level, modified bleeding index, and patient-related variables. Eligible participants are adults with at least one implant meeting peri-implantitis criteria and a removable crown, with exclusions for poor oral hygiene, recent antibiotics, heavy smoking, pregnancy, or other conditions affecting healing.

Who should consider this trial

Good fit: Ideal candidates are adults who have at least one implant with peri-implantitis and a removable crown, have not had non-surgical peri-implant therapy in the past 6 months or systemic antibiotics in the past 3 months, maintain good oral hygiene (FMPS ≤ 30%), are not pregnant, and do not smoke more than 10 cigarettes per day.

Not a fit: Patients unlikely to benefit include those without a removable crown, with poor oral hygiene (FMPS > 30%), heavy smokers (>10 cigarettes/day), pregnant or breastfeeding women, recent antibiotic recipients, or those with medical conditions that impair healing.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, removing the crown could lead to better pocket depth reduction and preserve supporting bone, possibly reducing the need for further invasive treatment.

How similar studies have performed: This specific question is relatively novel and prior data are limited, while existing non-surgical peri-implantitis studies have shown mixed and often modest long-term results.

Eligibility criteria

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients with at least one implant diagnosed with peri-implantitis (Berglundh et al., 2018);
* Patients with a crown on the implant affected by peri-implantitis that is removable;
* Patients who have not received non-surgical peri-implant therapy in the previous 6 months;
* Patients who have not taken systemic antibiotic therapy in the previous 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Full-Mouth Plaque Score (FMPS) \> 30% at the time of non-surgical therapy;
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
* Relevant medical history, in the opinion of the examining clinician, that could affect the outcome of non-surgical peri-implant therapy;
* Smoking patients consuming \> 10 cigarettes/day.

Where this trial is running

Chieti, Chieti

Study contacts

How to participate

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Conditions Peri-implantitis
Last reviewed 2026-06-13 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.