Reducing radiation exposure during sacral neuromodulation lead placement
Official title: Reduction in Fluoroscopy Radiation Exposure During Lead Implantation for Sacral Neuromodulation: A Randomized Prospective Study
Run by Loma Linda University · NCT04527445 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests if using lower radiation settings during sacral neuromodulation lead placement can help keep patients with overactive bladder safe while still getting the procedure done correctly.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 89 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 44 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Loma Linda University Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Loma Linda, California) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 2026 |
| Main results expected | June 2027 |
| Study ends | June 2027 |
| Registry record updated | March 6, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT04527445 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are patients with overactive bladder who are scheduled for lead implantation for sacral neuromodulation.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with neurogenic bladder, a BMI over 40, or peripheral neuropathy may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study evaluates the effectiveness of reduced radiation fluoroscopy settings compared to conventional fluoroscopy during the lead placement for sacral neuromodulation in patients with overactive bladder. Patients scheduled for this procedure will be randomized into two groups: one receiving the experimental reduced radiation settings and the other receiving standard fluoroscopic settings. The primary focus is to compare the radiation exposure between these two groups while ensuring optimal lead placement by the surgeon. The study aims to enhance patient safety by minimizing radiation exposure during this common procedure.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could significantly reduce radiation exposure for patients undergoing sacral neuromodulation, enhancing their safety during the procedure.
How similar studies have gone: While the approach of reducing radiation exposure in fluoroscopy is being explored, this specific application in sacral neuromodulation is relatively novel and has not been extensively tested in prior studies.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients undergoing lead implantation for sacral neuromodulation that have overactive bladder as defined by urinary urgency, frequency, nocturia with or without urgency incontinence. Exclusion Criteria: * neurogenic bladder, BMI \>40, or peripheral neuropathy.
Where it's running
-
Loma Linda University Health
Loma Linda, California, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Forrest Jellison, MD — Loma Linda University
- Study coordinator: Forrest Jellison, MD
- Email: fjellison@llu.edu
- Phone: 909 558-2830
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Shortening the trial time for sacral neuromodulation in treating urinary incontinence
This study is testing if cutting the trial period for a nerve treatment from 7 days to 3 days can still help women with urinary incontinence feel better before getting a permanent device.
-
Evaluation of eCoin for treating urgency urinary incontinence
This study is testing whether an implanted device called eCoin can help people with urgency urinary incontinence feel better over the long term.
-
Flyte device to help urinary incontinence after pelvic radiation for endometrial or cervical cancer
This study tests whether a home-use Flyte device, used during guided pelvic floor exercises, can improve urinary incontinence in women who had pelvic radiation for endometrial or cervical cancer.
-
Self-Start Macrobid for post-Botox lower urinary symptoms
This study tests whether giving a standing prescription for Macrobid after Botox treatment reduces urgent calls, messages, and visits for urinary symptoms compared with usual triage care.
-
Next-Gen Fluoroscopy System vs Conventional System in Endoscopy
This trial tests whether a next-generation fluoroscopy system lowers radiation exposure for patients and staff during fluoroscopy-guided endoscopic procedures.
-
Operator radiation dose during PCI: left distal radial access vs right conventional radial access
This study tests whether using the left distal radial approach during PCI leads to different radiation exposure for the operator compared with the standard right radial approach in adult patients.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.