Pressure-guided limited bone removal versus standard laminectomy for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis
Official title: Non-inferiority of Osseous Decompression of the Lumbar Canal Until Normalization of Epidural Pressure Compared to Conventional Open Laminectomy in Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Run by Universidad Complutense de Madrid · NCT07026305 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This test will see if using epidural pressure to guide a smaller bone removal works as well as standard open laminectomy for people with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 50 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 24 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Universidad Complutense de Madrid Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Madrid) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 21, 2025 |
| Main results expected | June 2026 |
| Study ends | October 2026 |
| Registry record updated | June 24, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07026305 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults with symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis and neurogenic claudication lasting >3 months, refractory to conservative treatment, with MRI confirmation and who consent to surgery.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with foraminal or lateral recess stenosis, symptomatic disc herniation at the treated level, spondylolisthesis > Grade I, radiological instability, severe scoliosis, compression fracture, or prior surgery at the level are unlikely to benefit or be eligible.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a single-blind, randomized, non-inferiority trial that compares conventional open laminectomy to a pressure-guided laminectomy in which bone is removed until epidural pressure normalizes. Adults with symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis and neurogenic claudication who have failed conservative care and have confirmatory MRI are randomized 1:1 and remain blinded to group assignment. Baseline and follow-up clinical scales (ZCQ, NPRS, ODI, JOABPEQ) are collected and patients are followed for one year after surgery. A single neurosurgeon at Hospital Clínico San Carlos performs the procedures using an intraoperative Codman microsensor for epidural pressure guidance and the study has no industry sponsorship.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients might get comparable symptom relief with less bone removal, which could reduce tissue trauma and speed recovery.
How similar studies have gone: The pressure-guided decompression approach is relatively novel with limited prior clinical trial evidence, although physiological studies and small series have suggested a link between epidural pressure reduction and symptom improvement.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Surgical indication determined by: * Lower back pain and/or lower extremity pain for more than 3 months. * Pain refractory to conservative medical management (analgesics, physical therapy, epidural block). * Clinical criterion of neurogenic claudication defined as a score ≥11 on the N-CLASS scale. * Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing lumbar canal stenosis. * Patient consents to the proposed surgical intervention. * Patient agrees to participate in the study by signing the informed consent form. Exclusion Criteria: * Foraminal or lateral recess stenosis. * Symptomatic disc herniation at the segment to be treated. * Spondylolisthesis \> Grade I (Meyerding) (translation \>25% of the vertebra) or spondylolysis. * Radiological instability defined as \>5 mm of anteroposterior translation on dynamic flexion-extension spine X-rays. * Scoliosis with Cobb angle \>30°. * Compression fracture at the level to be treated. * Prior surgery at the same segment to be treated. * Prior infection at the segment to be treated. * Contraindication for MRI. * Diagnosis of major depressive disorder or dysthymia according to DSM-V criteria.
Where it's running
-
Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Madrid, Spain Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Juan P Castaño-Montoya, M.D.,M.Sc. — Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- Study coordinator: Juan P Castaño-Montoya, M.D., M.Sc.
- Email: juanpcas@ucm.es
- Phone: +34669345474
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Effect of Irrigation Pressure on Postoperative Complications and Surgical Field Clarity in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery
This study tests whether the height of the irrigation fluid bag and the direction of the surgical cut affect fluid pressure, visibility, and early recovery in adults undergoing unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery.
-
Long-Term safety and performance of the IntraSPINE interlaminar implant for degenerative lumbar spine disease
This study follows up patients who previously received IntraSPINE implants to see how their symptoms and imaging look about 9 years later.
-
Microdecompression alone vs. decompression with fusion in adjacent segment stenosis
This trial tests whether a less invasive microdecompression can work as well as adding a fusion extension for people with adjacent segment stenosis after prior lumbar fusion.
-
Comparison of two TLIF procedures for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis
This trial tests two minimally invasive TLIF procedures (LUSE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF) to see which better helps people with single-level lumbar spinal stenosis who have not improved with non-surgical treatments.
-
Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery
This test compares opioid-free multimodal anesthesia (with or without an erector spinae plane block) against opioid-containing anesthesia in adults having elective lumbar spine surgery to see which controls pain better and reduces opioid need in the first 48 hours after surgery.
-
Prevalence of PAD in Patients With Surgically Treated Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
This study tests how common peripheral artery disease is in people who have lumbar spinal stenosis and are being considered for, or have had, surgery.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.