Preoperative magnetic clip versus wire localization for breast-conserving surgery in France.

Preoperative Magnetic Tracking in Breast Surgery in France: French Medical-economic Study.

Observational Centre Leon Berard · NCT06906601

This project tests whether magnetic clips or traditional metal wires work better and cost less for women having breast-conserving surgery to locate a single, non-palpable breast cancer lesion.

Quick facts

Study typeObservational
Enrollment772 (estimated)
Ages18 Years and up
SexFemale
SponsorCentre Leon Berard Academic / other
Locations7 sites (Lyon and 6 other locations)
Trial IDNCT06906601 on ClinicalTrials.gov

What this trial studies

MAGNETO is a prospective, non-interventional, multicenter French study comparing two routine localization methods—magnetic clip and metallic wire—for non-palpable, unifocal breast lesions. Patients are enrolled at preoperative consultation and followed for up to six months after surgery, with baseline clinical data, quality-of-life (EQ-5D-5L), satisfaction questionnaires, and complication recording. Radiologists and surgeons complete Likert-scale satisfaction questionnaires after localization and on the day of surgery, and centers follow their usual clinical practices without assigned randomization. The primary analysis is a cost-consequence comparison between the two localization approaches using real-world practice patterns across participating centers.

Who should consider this trial

Good fit: Adult women (≥18 years) with a single, unilateral invasive or in situ breast lesion who are scheduled for first-time breast-conserving surgery and require preoperative localization are eligible.

Not a fit: Patients needing bilateral or multifocal surgery, those with metastatic disease, those requiring neoadjuvant therapy, pregnant or breastfeeding women, or those unable to comply with follow-up are unlikely to be represented or benefit from the results.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, magnetic clip localization could lower overall costs, improve scheduling flexibility, and increase patient and clinician satisfaction compared with wire localization.

How similar studies have performed: Previous clinical series and trials of magnetic seed/clip localization have demonstrated comparable targeting accuracy and logistical advantages over wires, though robust medico-economic comparisons in routine practice are still limited.

Eligibility criteria

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* I1. Female aged ≥ 18 years;
* I2. Patient presenting with a unifocal and unilateral lesion of invasive carcinoma or in situ;
* I3. Indication for first breast-conserving treatment with the need for preoperative localization of the lesion, regardless of the associated lymph node procedure;
* I4. Patient affiliated with a health insurance system;
* I5. Non-opposition to the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

* E.1. Psychological, family, or sociological condition that may potentially compromise adherence to the treatment protocol and follow-up;
* E.2. Bilateral surgery required;
* E.3. Patient with metastatic breast cancer;
* E.4. Multifocal or benign lesions;
* E.5. Pregnant or breastfeeding patient;
* E.6. Need for neoadjuvant treatment;
* E.8. Patient under guardianship, curatorship, or deprived of liberty.

Where this trial is running

Lyon and 6 other locations

Study contacts

How to participate

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Conditions Breast CancerMedico-economic ImpactBreast Cancer Surgerycancerbreast cancerbreast cancer surgerypreoperative localizationmagnetic clip
Last reviewed 2026-06-15 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.