Poly-L-lactic acid injections for vulvovaginal tissue regeneration
Official title: Intravaginal Injection of Poly-L-Lactic Acid for Treatment of Cystocele: A Randomized Trial
Run by Duke University · NCT07544667 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will try injections of poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) versus placebo to see if they strengthen vaginal tissue and reduce bulge symptoms and sexual problems in women with stage II anterior vaginal wall prolapse (cystocele).
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 21 Years and up |
| Sex | Women only |
| Enrollment | 20 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Duke University Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Durham, North Carolina) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 20, 2026 |
| Main results expected | July 2027 |
| Study ends | July 2028 |
| Registry record updated | August 21, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07544667 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are women over 21 with symptomatic stage II anterior vaginal wall prolapse (Ba ≥ -1), able to be abstinent or using contraception or postmenopausal at injection, and able to read or understand English.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with apical or posterior prolapse greater than stage I, prior pelvic radiation or prior vaginal reconstructive surgery (except total vaginal hysterectomy or sling), chronic vaginal infections, recent or planned vaginal laser/topical treatments, or allergy to Sculptra components are unlikely to be eligible or to benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This interventional trial compares intravaginal injections of poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA, Sculptra) with placebo (sterile water) in women who have symptomatic stage II anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Participants are adult women (over 21) with a measured Ba point ≥ -1 and report bulge symptoms; they must be abstinent, using contraception, or postmenopausal at the time of injection. The study focuses on safety and preliminary signals of tissue regeneration, vaginal topography, and sexual function after treatment. Procedures and follow-up visits occur at Duke Urogynecology and will monitor adverse events and symptom changes over the study period.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, injections could strengthen anterior vaginal wall tissue and preserve or improve vaginal sensation and sexual function while avoiding more invasive surgery.
How similar studies have gone: PLLA has an established safety record as a dermatologic biostimulant, but using PLLA for vaginal tissue regeneration in POP is a novel application with limited clinical evidence to date.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age \> 21 * Stage II POP of anterior vaginal wall (Ba ≥ -1) * Symptomatic bulge symptoms * Positive response to PFDI-20 question 3: Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in the vaginal area? * AND any degree of bother. Providing any answer other than "not at all" to "how much does this bother you" * Abstinent, on contraception, or postmenopausal at time of injection * Must read or understand English Exclusion Criteria: * Concurrent apical or posterior prolapse \> stage 1 * Prior pelvic radiation * Previous vaginal reconstructive surgery (Except total vaginal hysterectomy or sling) * History of chronic vaginal infections (ex. Sexually transmitted infection or bacterial vaginosis) * Prior vaginal laser treatment \< 6 months * Planned vaginal laser/topical treatment * History of hypertrophic reaction to vicryl (polyglactin-910) * Allergy to Sculptra aesthetic or any components of Sculptra (PLLA, carboxymethylcellulose, non-pyrogenic mannitol) * Allergy to silicone * Premenopausal without contraception or abstinence during treatment phase * Currently breastfeeding * Connective tissue disorder * Uncontrolled diabetes (defined as HbA1c \> 8) * Does not read or understand English * Inability to provide informed consent * Physical limitations that would prevent subjects from performing the required pelvic wand massage sessions after each injection, such as significant arthritis or other mobility limitations. * Prescription anticoagulation therapy that cannot be safely discontinued (Aspirin and anti-platelet therapies would be considered acceptable) * Current use of other treatments for prolapse, such as pessary, in subjects who are unwilling to discontinue these treatments during the study period. * Planning to start pelvic floor physical therapy during the study * Undergoing physical therapy and not willing to stop internal therapy for 2 weeks after an injection or biopsy
Where it's running
-
Duke Urogynecology, Patterson Place
Durham, North Carolina, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Cassandra Kisby, MD MS FACOG FACS — Duke University
- Study coordinator: Cassandra Kisby, MD MS FACOG FACS
- Email: cassandra.kisby@duke.edu
- Phone: 9194011000
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Risk predictor for new urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery
This study tests a model to predict which women might develop new stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse repair.
-
Comparing the Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse
This study tests whether the Manchester procedure or vaginal hysterectomy works better for women with symptomatic uterine prolapse over a two-year follow-up.
-
Pelvic floor mesh used in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy to repair pelvic organ prolapse
This study tests the ProGYNious mesh to see if it safely and effectively repairs pelvic organ prolapse in adults undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
-
Paracervical block for pain control after vNOTES uterosacral ligament suspension
This will test whether a paracervical injection of bupivacaine reduces early postoperative pain in women having vNOTES uterosacral ligament suspension for pelvic organ prolapse.
-
Postpartum pelvic floor recovery and early rehabilitation after vaginal birth
This project tests whether early, individualized pelvic floor muscle training starting 2–3 weeks after a vaginal birth helps people with postpartum pelvic floor symptoms recover better than usual care.
-
Removing fallopian tubes and ovaries during vaginal hysterectomy: energy-sealing device versus standard technique
This trial tests whether using a LigaSure energy-sealing device to remove the fallopian tubes and ovaries during vaginal hysterectomy is safer, faster, or causes less blood loss and pain than the standard clamping, cutting, and suturing method for women with pelvic organ prolapse.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.