Personalized mean arterial pressure targets guided by central venous pressure for adults with cardiogenic shock
Official title: Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Controlled Trial Assessing the Personalization of Mean Arterial Pressure in Adult Patients With Cardiogenic Shock
Run by CMC Ambroise Paré · NCT07345559 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This will test whether setting each adult cardiogenic shock patient's blood pressure target based on their central venous pressure helps organs recover and improves survival compared with standard MAP targets.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 406 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | CMC Ambroise Paré Academic / other |
| Locations | 11 sites (Amiens and 10 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 26, 2026 |
| Main results expected | July 25, 2029 |
| Study ends | July 25, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | September 29, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07345559 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (≥18 years) with cardiogenic shock (SCAI class C or higher) who require vasopressors/inotropes, have CVP ≥5 mmHg and MAP ≤70 mmHg at enrollment, and can provide consent or have appropriate emergency inclusion are the ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with CVP <5 mmHg, MAP >70 mmHg at enrollment, catecholamine infusion >24 hours, chronic advanced kidney disease (stage G4/G5) or chronic dialysis, or already on mechanical circulatory support at inclusion are unlikely to benefit from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized interventional study compares a personalized MAP strategy that adjusts targets using measured or estimated central venous pressure (CVP) versus standard MAP management in adults with cardiogenic shock. Eligible patients are adults with cardiogenic shock (SCAI class ≥ C) who require inotropes/vasopressors and meet enrollment physiologic criteria. Patients are randomized early after presentation, and MAP is titrated in each arm according to the assigned strategy while monitoring organ function and hemodynamics. The study's main outcomes focus on organ dysfunction and survival during the acute shock period.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, personalizing MAP by accounting for CVP could reduce organ dysfunction and lower mortality in cardiogenic shock.
How similar studies have gone: Observational and post‑hoc analyses have linked higher early MAP to better survival in cardiogenic shock, but prospective randomized testing of MAP targets personalized by CVP is largely novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Aged ≥18 years * Cardiogenic shock state, according to the consensus definition, * SCAI (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions) classification ≥ C * Consent from the patient or close relative / trusted person or emergency inclusion procedure * Benefiting fromciary of a social security scheme Exclusion Criteria: * Catecholamine infusion for more than 24 consecutive hours; * CVP \< 5 mm Hg at inclusion; * MAP \> 70 mmHg at inclusion; * Chronic kidney disease stage G4 (defined by an eGFR between 15-29 ml/min/1.73 m²) or G5 (defined by an eGFR less than 15 ml/min/1.73 m²) according to the KDIGO CKD classification at inclusion; * Chronic dialysis or presence of renal replacement therapy criteria at inclusion ; * Recovered cardiopulmonary arrest within 7 days prior to inclusion; * Patient already on mechanical circulatory support at inclusion before enrollment (patients who receive support after inclusion will not be excluded); * Primary diagnosis of tamponade, pulmonary embolism, or septic shock; * Hypersensitivity to norepinephrine tartrate or to any of the following excipients: sodium chloride, hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide water for injectable preparations; * Absence of central venous access; * Known pregnancy or current breastfeeding; * Under legal guardianship, curatorship, or judicial protection.
Where it's running
-
Hôpital Henri Mondor
Créteil, France Recruiting -
CMC Ambroise Paré - Hartmann
Neuilly-sur-Seine, France Recruiting -
CHU d'Amiens-Picardie
Amiens, France Not yet recruiting -
Hôpital Privé Jacques Cartier
Massy, France Not yet recruiting -
CHU d'Orléans
Orléans, France Not yet recruiting -
Hôpital Lariboisière
Paris, France Not yet recruiting
Show 5 more locations
-
Hôpital Cochin
Paris, France Not yet recruiting -
Clinique NCT + /Saint-Gatien
Saint-Cyr-sur-Loire, France Not yet recruiting -
Centre Cardiologique du Nord
Saint-Denis, France Not yet recruiting -
CHRU de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, France Not yet recruiting -
CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, France Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Armand MEKONTSO DESSAP, MD
- Email: armand.dessap@aphp.fr
- Phone: + 33 1 45 17 85 06
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Factors Influencing Outcomes in ECMO and Impella Patients
This study tests whether metabolic and thyroid hormone changes help predict survival for adults on ECMO or Impella at a single Hungarian cardiac ICU.
-
Evaluating a noninvasive tissue sensor to detect cardiogenic shock earlier in heart patients
This pilot, noninvasive study tests whether the NIRSense wearable can help detect deterioration in adults with cardiogenic shock risk due to heart attack or heart failure.
-
Safety and Efficacy of an Extracorporeal Ventricular Assist System for Cardiogenic Shock
This study tests whether an extracorporeal ventricular assist device can safely provide short-term heart support and help patients with cardiogenic shock or trouble weaning from bypass.
-
Left Ventricular Support and Advanced Monitoring in AMI–Cardiogenic Shock: Immediate Impella Use and PAC/Monitoring vs Standard Care
In adults with heart attack-related cardiogenic shock, this trial tests whether using an Impella left ventricular assist device and/or protocolized pulmonary artery catheter monitoring improves survival compared with standard care.
-
CRP Apheresis for infarct-related cardiogenic shock
This study tests whether selectively removing C-reactive protein with apheresis, in addition to standard care, helps people with cardiogenic shock after a heart attack.
-
Compare two ventilator modes in adults with cardiac ICU needs and invasive ventilation
This pilot tests whether volume-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation can be safely used in adults with heart disease and respiratory failure who need invasive ventilation.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.