Percutaneous vs. Endoscopic Gallbladder Drainage for those who aren’t surgery candidates
Official title: Percutaneous or Endoscopic Gallbladder Drainage: The PEG Trial
Run by Orlando Health, Inc. · NCT07696546 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This randomized trial tests two less-invasive gallbladder drainage methods to see which works better for people with acute gallbladder infection who aren’t candidates for surgery.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 110 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Orlando Health, Inc. Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Orlando, Florida) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 2026 |
| Main results expected | June 2032 |
| Study ends | December 2032 |
| Registry record updated | July 10, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07696546 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults with suspected or confirmed ACC who are deemed never-surgery candidates due to severe comorbidity or patient choice and can undergo either drainage method.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who have contraindications to both procedures, who do not complete follow-up, or whose condition evolves to make surgery feasible may derive limited or no benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Adults with acute calculous cholecystitis who are too frail for surgery are randomly assigned to receive either a percutaneous cholecystostomy or an endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage. The study compares treatment outcomes and quality of life over 36 months. The goal is to determine which approach provides better symptom relief, fewer complications, and improved well-being in this high-risk group. Procedures are performed by specialists in interventional radiology and endoscopy, with follow-up assessments to monitor recovery and longer-term effects.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could identify the preferred less-invasive drainage method for high-risk patients, potentially improving recovery and quality of life.
How similar studies have gone: Prior smaller studies suggest both approaches are feasible, but direct randomized comparisons in never-surgery candidates are limited, making this trial novel in its specific population.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with suspected or confirmed acute calculous cholecystitis, diagnosed per Tokyo guidelines * Age ≥ 18 years * Patients due to severe comorbidity who are deemed to be never-surgery candidates by the multidisciplinary team or patients who refuse to undergo surgery. * Patients can undergo EUS-guided drainage and percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement. * Written informed consent by the patient or guardian who can understand the nature and possible consequences of participation in the study. Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnancy * Patients who are potential candidates for future cholecystectomy. * Patients unwilling to undergo follow-up assessments. * Patients with suspected gangrene or perforation of the gallbladder * Patients are diagnosed with concomitant liver abscess or necrotizing pancreatitis. * Altered anatomy of the upper gastrointestinal tract due to surgery of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum. * Indwelling percutaneous cholecystostomy tube. * Refractory/persistently significant ascites despite paracentesis. * Distance between the gallbladder and gastric/duodenal wall that cannot be bridged by the metal stent. * Abnormal coagulation parameters that cannot be correct: INR \> 1.7 and/or platelets \< 50.000/mm3
Where it's running
-
Orlando Health Digestive Health Institute
Orlando, Florida, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Ji Young Bang, MD MPH — Orlando Health, Digestive Health Institute
- Study coordinator: Ji Young Bang, MD MPH
- Email: jiyoung.bang@orlandohealth.com
- Phone: 321-842-2273
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Cholecystitis: EUS-guided Gallbladder Drainage vs Cyst removal by LCC in older adults
In people aged 75 and up with acute cholecystitis, this study tests whether an endoscopic drainage procedure (EUS-GBD) works as well as the standard gallbladder removal surgery (LCC).
-
Deep learning rapid MRI for preoperative evaluation of acute cholecystitis.
This will test whether a new fast abdominal MRI using deep learning can provide image quality comparable to standard MRI for adults with acute cholecystitis who need preoperative scans.
-
Early versus delayed gallbladder removal after tube drainage for moderate or severe acute cholecystitis.
This trial tests whether removing the gallbladder soon after a drainage tube is placed or waiting several weeks leads to fewer complications for adults with moderate or severe acute cholecystitis.
-
One-year outcomes after different treatments for acute cholecystitis in people aged 70 and older
This project will compare supportive care, drainage, and surgery for people 70 and older with acute cholecystitis to see which approach leads to better health and fewer repeat treatments after one year.
-
Conservative versus proactive care after EUS-guided gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis
This trial will test whether, for people with acute cholecystitis who cannot have surgery, keeping the endoscopic gallbladder stent in place long-term or doing regular endoscopic cleanings and removing the stent works better.
-
Preventing acute cholecystitis using endoscopic techniques
This study is testing if a new endoscopic technique can help prevent acute cholecystitis in patients with certain conditions better than standard care.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.