Patient-specific 3D-printed breast molds for shaping tissue during autologous reconstruction
Official title: Interactive Design of Patient-Specific Molds for Tissue Shaping
Run by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center · NCT06711965 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This project will test whether 3D-printed, patient-specific breast molds help surgeons shape tissue faster and more consistently during autologous breast reconstruction for adults after mastectomy.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 160 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Houston, Texas) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 2, 2026 |
| Main results expected | August 1, 2028 |
| Study ends | August 1, 2030 |
| Registry record updated | October 6, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06711965 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (18+) who can provide informed consent and are scheduled for autologous breast reconstruction using DIEP or TRAM free flaps are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients planned for stacked flaps, DIEP with vascularized lymph node transfer, those receiving neoadjuvant radiation, or patients undergoing implant-based reconstruction are unlikely to benefit from this approach.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Surgeons will use clinical decision-support algorithms to design patient-specific breast molds that are produced with 3D printing and used intraoperatively during autologous free-flap reconstruction (DIEP or TRAM). Participants will be enrolled into intervention and control groups to compare outcomes with and without the custom mold. The primary outcome focuses on operative efficiency for tissue shaping, while secondary outcomes include number of mold uses, intraoperative shaping time, aesthetic revision rates, and postoperative complications. Results will inform the practical utility of the algorithms and molds for routine reconstructive practice.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patient-specific molds could shorten operative time and improve cosmetic results after autologous breast reconstruction.
How similar studies have gone: Prior case series and small studies using 3D-printed templates or surgical guides in breast and reconstructive surgery have shown promising feasibility and aesthetic improvements, but randomized data are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients 18 years of age or older 2. Patients who are willing and able to provide informed consent 3. Patients who are scheduled to undergo breast reconstruction with free flap (Deep Interior Epigastric Artery Perforator (DIEP) flap or Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous (TRAM) flap) Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients whose surgical plan includes the use of stacked flaps (DIEP + other free flap, usually from the thigh or buttock) 2. Patients whose surgical plan includes the use of DIEP flap with vascularized lymph node transfer 3. Patients undergoing neoadjuvant radiation
Where it's running
-
The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Ashleigh M Francis, MD — M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
- Study coordinator: Ashleigh M Francis, MD
- Email: amfrancis@mdanderson.org
- Phone: 713-563-4598
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Reverse Fly Exercise for Supraspinatus Tendinitis in Women on Aromatase Inhibitors After Mastectomy
This study tests whether adding reverse fly exercises to standard tendonitis therapy helps relief in women aged 50–70 who had mastectomy and are on aromatase inhibitors.
-
Transverse vs Longitudinal Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Breast Surgery
This trial tests whether a longitudinal ultrasound view for serratus anterior plane block provides better pain relief after breast surgery than the standard transverse view.
-
Combined PECS II and PIP blocks vs TPVB for post-mastectomy pain relief
This trial tests whether a combination of PECS II and superficial PIP blocks can provide better or similar pain relief after mastectomy compared with the standard thoracic paravertebral block.
-
Erector Spinae Block vs Paravertebral Block for Chronic Pain After Mastectomy
This trial tests whether an erector spinae block can better prevent chronic pain after mastectomy than a paravertebral block in adults 18–80.
-
Same-day awake mastectomy with immediate prepectoral implant reconstruction
This project tests whether the AMADeuS care pathway—awake same-day mastectomy with prepectoral implant reconstruction, opioid-sparing anesthesia, and telemedicine follow-up—controls pain and is as safe as usual hospital care for women having mastectomy.
-
Comparing two ultrasound-guided chest wall nerve blocks for pain after mastectomy
This study will see if one of two ultrasound-guided chest wall nerve blocks gives better pain relief and less opioid use for women having an elective mastectomy.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.