Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 1 Year to 8

Pain control with rectus sheath block versus caudal epidural block after minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair in children

Official title: Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Rectus Sheath Block and Caudal Epidural Block in Pediatric Patients Scheduled for Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing

Run by Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital · NCT07147062 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study will test whether a rectus sheath block or a caudal epidural block provides better pain relief for children aged 1–8 having minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair (PIRS).

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages1 Year to 8 Years
SexAll
Enrollment65 (estimated)
SponsorDiskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital
Government
Locations1 site (Altındağ, Ankara)
StatusRecruiting
StartedSeptember 8, 2025
Main results expectedFebruary 13, 2026
Study endsFebruary 27, 2026
Registry record updatedSeptember 9, 2025
Trial IDNCT07147062 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Children aged 1–8 years with ASA physical status I–II who are scheduled for PIRS and do not have a bleeding disorder are ideal candidates.

Probably not a fit

Children outside the 1–8 year age range, those with ASA status III or higher, or those with bleeding diathesis are unlikely to qualify or benefit from the interventions tested here.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This interventional study compares two regional nerve block techniques—rectus sheath block (RSB) and caudal epidural block (CEB)—for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS). Eligible patients aged 1 to 8 years with ASA physical status I–II receive either RSB or CEB during surgery at the participating center. Postoperative outcomes such as pain scores, opioid consumption, and block-related adverse events are recorded to compare effectiveness and safety. The goal is to identify which block provides better pain control and reduces opioid needs after PIRS.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the preferred block could reduce post-surgery pain and opioid requirements, improving comfort and lowering opioid-related side effects for children after PIRS.

How similar studies have gone: Both caudal epidural and rectus sheath blocks have been used successfully for analgesia in pediatric lower abdominal surgery, though direct comparisons specifically in PIRS patients are limited.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients aged between 1 and 8 years
* ASA physical status I-II
* Patients who underwent PIRS surgery in the operating room and received either a rectus sheath block or a caudal epidural block

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients younger than 1 year or older than 8 years
* ASA physical status ≥ III
* History of bleeding diathesis

Where it's running

  • Ankara Etlik City Hospital
    Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.