Osseointegrated (bone-anchored) prosthesis for below-knee (transtibial) amputation
Official title: Transtibial Osseointegration Surgery Study (TOSS)
Run by Walter Reed National Military Medical Center · NCT06636136 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether the OPRA bone-anchored implant helps people aged 22–65 with transtibial (below-knee) amputations who cannot use or do not benefit from socket prostheses.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 22 Years to 65 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 30 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Federal |
| Locations | 2 sites (Bethesda, Maryland and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 20, 2025 |
| Main results expected | April 30, 2028 |
| Study ends | April 30, 2030 |
| Registry record updated | October 13, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06636136 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
People aged 22–65 with traumatic or cancer-related transtibial amputations who are skeletally mature and have failed or cannot tolerate conventional socket prostheses, and who are eligible for care at the participating military treatment facility(ies).
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with incomplete skeletal growth, active uncontrolled infection, inadequate bone quality or other medical contraindications to surgery, or those who do well with conventional socket prostheses are unlikely to benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The protocol implants the OPRA osseointegration system into the tibia of eligible transtibial amputees and follows them with standardized clinical and radiologic exams and performance testing. Outcomes include soft-tissue complications and infections, patient-reported function, quality of life and pain scores, physical performance measures, and biomechanical and bone-quality metrics. Assessments occur preoperatively and at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after surgery, with data recorded on electronic case report forms. Procedures are performed by experienced investigators at participating centers including Walter Reed and Penn Medicine.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the OPRA system could reduce socket-related problems and improve mobility, comfort, and quality of life for people with below-knee amputations.
How similar studies have gone: Osseointegration for transfemoral amputees has shown improved mobility and quality-of-life in prior programs but also higher rates of soft-tissue complications and infection, so transtibial application builds on that experience.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of a transtibial amputation age 22-65. * The OPRA™ Implant System is indicated for patients who have transtibial amputation due to trauma or cancer and who have or are anticipated to have rehabilitation problems with, or cannot use, a conventional socket prosthesis. The OPRA™ Implant System is intended for skeletally mature patients. * The patient failed to receive benefit from socket prostheses or is expected to not tolerate socket use due to problems such as: * Recurrent skin infections and ulcerations in the socket contact area * Pain * A short stump preventing the use of socket prosthesis * Volume fluctuation in the stump * Soft tissue scarring * Extensive area of skin grafting * Socket retention problems due to excessive perspiration * Restricted mobility * Eligible to receive care at Military Treatment Facility ( WRNMMC only) * DEERS-eligible ( WRNMMC only) Exclusion Criteria: * The patient's skeletal growth is not complete. Completed skeletal growth is defined through the finding of generally closed epiphyseal zones on X-ray. * The patient has atypical skeletal anatomy which may affect treatment with OPRA™. * Examples of atypical skeletal anatomy. * Skeletal dimensions outside defined interval. * Development anomalies. * Conditions which are not amenable to device insertion such as deformities, fracture, infection. * The patient would have less than 2 mm of remaining cortex bone available around the implant, if implanted. * Osteoporosis. * The patient is older than 65 years and younger than 22 years. * BMI over 35. * Do not treat patients with the following concurrent diseases: * Severe peripheral vascular disease. * Diabetic mellitus with complications. * Neuropathy or neuropathic disease. * Active infection or dormant bacteria. * Metabolic bone disease and/or metastatic lesions in the residual tibia. * Pregnancy before the surgery female patients will take a pregnancy test) Note: Patients who become pregnant, after surgery stage I, surgery stage II will be delayed until safe to do so by their doctor. The patient will remain in the study, unless they would like to withdrawal. * The patient is not expected to be able to comply with treatment and follow up requirements. * Participants unable to sign their own consent (No legally authorized representatives may provide consent)
Where it's running
-
Orhopaedic Surgery Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, United States Recruiting -
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Penn Medicine University City
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Christopher H Renninger, MD — Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
- Study coordinator: Emma L Stewart
- Email: emma.l.stewart4.ctr@health.mil
- Phone: 202-549-3229
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparing powered and mechanical prosthetic knees for K2-level amputees
This study is testing whether powered prosthetic knees work better than mechanical ones for K2-level amputees to help improve their mobility and make better choices for future prosthetic designs.
-
Effect of EMG sensor number and placement on control of below-elbow prosthetic arms
This project will test whether changing the number and placement of myoelectric sensors helps adults with below-elbow limb absence control a prosthetic arm better while wearing a real device.
-
Microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees for limited community ambulators with above-knee amputation.
This test will see if switching to a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee reduces fall-related health problems and improves walking speed, mobility, and quality of life for adults with above-knee amputations who are limited community ambulators compared with non-microprocessor knees.
-
Assessment of patients with transfemoral amputation using osseointegrated implants
This study is testing if a new type of implant that attaches directly to the bone can help people with transfemoral amputation move better and feel more comfortable than traditional prosthetic sockets.
-
Understanding the impact of powered prosthetics on walking for transfemoral amputees
This study is testing whether powered knee and ankle prosthetics can help transfemoral amputees walk better, especially when combined with special training.
-
Evaluation of a new myoelectric prosthesis for transradial amputees
This study is testing a new type of prosthetic arm that uses a special implant to help people with below-the-elbow amputations control it more easily and naturally.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.