On-site Simulation Training to Improve Infection Prevention in an Adult ICU
Official title: Impact of an On-site Simulation-based Training Programme on Adherence to Standard Precautions and Healthcare-associated Infections in Adult Intensive Care : Prospective Quasi-experimental Before-and-after Study
Run by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville · NCT07822971 · Data updated 2026-11-12
A 18‑month, single‑center effort tests whether repeated in‑situ simulation training helps ICU staff consistently follow standard precautions and reduce infections.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 1000 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Metz) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | August 31, 2027 |
| Study ends | March 2028 |
| Registry record updated | September 24, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07822971 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (18+) admitted to the participating ICU with stays of 48 hours or more and with usable outcome data in the records.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients whose infections are driven by factors beyond standard precautions or whose care is not influenced by staff training may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This prospective, before‑and‑after study takes place in one adult ICU over 18 months, with 6 months before training, 6 months of hands‑on simulation sessions, and 6 months after. The intervention uses SIMREA, an in situ simulation program aiming to strengthen knowledge, technical skills, and teamwork needed to reliably apply standard precautions. The study compares infection-related outcomes before and after the simulation training while accounting for real‑world ICU challenges. Outcomes are based on data from electronic health records and routine surveillance. Eligible participants are adults (18+) admitted to the ICU with stays of at least 48 hours and for whom outcome data are available.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the program could improve adherence to infection prevention practices and reduce hospital‑acquired infections in ICUs.
How similar studies have gone: Past studies using in situ simulation to strengthen infection control have shown improvements in adherence and some reductions in infections in ICU settings.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients hospitalized in the adult intensive care unit at CHR Metz-Thionville during the study period * Patients aged 18 years or older * Patients with a length of stay in the intensive care unit of 48 hours or more * Patients for whom the data necessary to assess the outcome measures are available in the electronic health record and/or hospital surveillance databases * Patients who have been informed about the use of their health data for research purposes, in accordance with the procedures established by the institution Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who, after being informed, objected to the use of their health data for this research
Where it's running
-
CHR Metz-Thionville, Hôpital de Mercy
Metz, France Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Dr. Mathieu LLORENS, MD — CHR Metz-Thionville, Hôpital de Mercy
- Study coordinator: Mélanie JUNKE
- Email: projet-recherche-clinique@chr-metz-thionville.fr
- Phone: 0033387179886
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Kendall exercises with and without positional release therapy for upper crossed syndrome
This study tests Kendall exercises with and without positional release therapy to see if they reduce neck and shoulder pain and improve posture in adults with upper crossed syndrome.
-
Breathing and manual therapy to improve function in college students with upper cross syndrome
In college students with upper cross syndrome, adding a specific breathing technique (ujjayi pranayama) to manual therapy is being tested to see if it helps spinal alignment relate to better functional performance.
-
Kendall vs Janda’s Approach with Diaphragmatic Breathing for Upper Crossed Syndrome
This trial tests whether Kendall exercises with diaphragmatic breathing help reduce pain and disability in people with Upper Crossed Syndrome compared with Janda’s approach plus diaphragmatic breathing.
-
Egoscue vs Feldenkrais for Upper Cross Syndrome
This trial compares two exercise approaches, Egoscue and Feldenkrais, to see if one can reduce neck and shoulder pain and improve posture in adults with upper cross syndrome.
-
Maitland mobilization plus Kendall exercises vs Kendall exercises alone for upper cross syndrome
This trial tests whether adding Maitland mobilization to Kendall exercises helps reduce neck/upper back pain and improve posture in adults with Upper Cross Syndrome.
-
Rib mobilization with postural correction exercises for Upper Crossed Syndrome
This will test whether adding rib mobilization to postural correction exercises helps people aged 20–45 with Upper Crossed Syndrome reduce neck pain and improve posture and thoracic mobility.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.