Egoscue vs Feldenkrais for Upper Cross Syndrome
Official title: Comparative Effects of Egoscue and Feldenkrais Exercises on Pain, Craniovertebral Angle and Functional Disability in Upper Cross Syndrome
Run by Riphah International University · NCT07628413 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial compares two exercise approaches, Egoscue and Feldenkrais, to see if one can reduce neck and shoulder pain and improve posture in adults with upper cross syndrome.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 25 Years to 45 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 48 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Riphah International University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 15, 2025 |
| Main results expected | June 15, 2026 |
| Study ends | July 15, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | June 5, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07628413 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults 25–45 with chronic neck pain (NPRS 3–7) and a craniovertebral angle under 50 degrees who have tight pectoralis and trapezius muscles with weak rhomboids and deep neck flexors.
✕Probably not a fit
Individuals outside the age range, without the specified postural measurements, or with recent shoulder surgery or other exclusions may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
In this randomized study, adults aged 25–45 with chronic neck pain and specific postural features will be assigned to either Egoscue exercises plus conventional therapy or Feldenkrais exercises plus conventional therapy, three times weekly. The trial will measure changes in pain, the craniovertebral angle, and functional disability over the treatment period. Participants will be recruited from two Lahore clinics using simple randomization and sealed envelopes. The study uses non-probability convenience sampling for enrollment and follows standard safety exclusions related to shoulder and soft tissue conditions. Outcome data will help determine if one exercise approach offers better relief and postural improvement for upper cross syndrome.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, participants may experience reduced pain and improved posture, potentially guiding non-surgical management of upper cross syndrome.
How similar studies have gone: Prior research in posture-based therapies has shown mixed results; this study explores a direct comparison between two posture-focused exercise approaches.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age 25 to 45 years * Both genders (male and female) * Chronic neck pain for more than three months - NPRS (3 to 7) * Craniovertebral angle less than 50 degrees * Tight Pectoralis muscle and trapezius * Weak rhomboids and deep neck flexors Exclusion Criteria: * Any malignancy related to soft tissue and shoulder joint * Congenital joint deformity * Recent fractures to joint * Recent surgery of shoulder joint or associated structures * Patients with shoulder dislocation
Where it's running
-
Rabiya Noor
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: areesha shakeel, MSPT(CP) — Riphah International University
- Study coordinator: Rabiya Noor, phd
- Email: Rabiya.Noor@riphah.edu.pk
- Phone: 03344355660
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Kendall exercises with and without positional release therapy for upper crossed syndrome
This study tests Kendall exercises with and without positional release therapy to see if they reduce neck and shoulder pain and improve posture in adults with upper crossed syndrome.
-
Breathing and manual therapy to improve function in college students with upper cross syndrome
In college students with upper cross syndrome, adding a specific breathing technique (ujjayi pranayama) to manual therapy is being tested to see if it helps spinal alignment relate to better functional performance.
-
Kendall vs Janda’s Approach with Diaphragmatic Breathing for Upper Crossed Syndrome
This trial tests whether Kendall exercises with diaphragmatic breathing help reduce pain and disability in people with Upper Crossed Syndrome compared with Janda’s approach plus diaphragmatic breathing.
-
Maitland mobilization plus Kendall exercises vs Kendall exercises alone for upper cross syndrome
This trial tests whether adding Maitland mobilization to Kendall exercises helps reduce neck/upper back pain and improve posture in adults with Upper Cross Syndrome.
-
Rib mobilization with postural correction exercises for Upper Crossed Syndrome
This will test whether adding rib mobilization to postural correction exercises helps people aged 20–45 with Upper Crossed Syndrome reduce neck pain and improve posture and thoracic mobility.
-
Comparing GPR versus NASM corrective exercises for upper-cross posture and neck pain
This tests whether Global Postural Re-education or NASM-based corrective exercises better reduce pain and disability and improve neck endurance and posture in adults aged 20–45 with upper cross syndrome.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.