Non-immunogenic staphylokinase (Fortelyzin®) for massive pulmonary embolism
Official title: An Open, Prospective, Non-interventional, Multicentre, Controlled Study of Safety and Efficacy of the Thrombolysis With the Non-immunogenic Staphylokinase in Patients With Massive Pulmonary Embolism (FORPE Registry)
Run by Supergene, LLC · NCT07245927 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This project tests whether a single 15 mg bolus of non-immunogenic staphylokinase (Fortelyzin®) is safe and works for adults with massive pulmonary embolism.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 20000 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Supergene, LLC Industry-sponsored |
| Drugs / interventions | idarucizumab |
| Locations | 14 sites (Belgorod and 13 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | October 31, 2027 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | July 6, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07245927 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (age ≥18) with CT‑confirmed massive pulmonary embolism, evidence of right ventricular dysfunction plus persistent hypotension or shock, symptom onset within 14 days, and no contraindications to thrombolysis are the intended participants.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with high bleeding risk (recent major surgery or trauma, recent intracranial hemorrhage or CNS disease, recent incompressible vessel puncture), those without massive PE, and pediatric patients are unlikely to benefit from this treatment.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The FORPE Registry is a post‑registration, observational registry collecting routine clinical data on adults treated with a single 15 mg intravenous bolus of non‑immunogenic staphylokinase for CT‑confirmed massive pulmonary embolism. Eligible patients have signs of right ventricular overload or dysfunction combined with persistent arterial hypotension or shock and symptom onset within 14 days. The registry tracks safety outcomes (including major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage) and clinical efficacy in real‑world emergency settings. The registry follows publication of a prior multicenter randomized non‑inferiority trial that reported non‑inferiority to alteplase with fewer major bleedings.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this treatment could offer a rapid, weight‑independent, single‑dose thrombolytic option with potentially lower risk of major bleeding for patients with massive pulmonary embolism.
How similar studies have gone: A prior multicenter randomized non‑inferiority trial (FORPE, NCT04688320) reported that non‑immunogenic staphylokinase was non‑inferior to alteplase and had fewer major bleedings, providing supportive evidence for this approach.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Men and women aged 18 years and older. * Verified diagnosis of massive pulmonary embolism (using computer tomography) * Signs of overload / dysfunction of the right ventricle (at least one) in combination with persistent arterial hypotension or shock * The time from the symptoms onset is no more than 14 days. * Thrombolysis with the non-immunogenic staphylokinase, 15 mg as a single intravenous bolus. Exclusion Criteria: * Increased risk of bleeding: * extensive bleeding at present or within the previous 6 months; * intracranial (including subarachnoid) hemorrhage at present or in history; * hemorrhagic stroke within the last 6 months; * a history of diseases of the central nervous system (including neoplasms, aneurysms); * intracranial or spinal surgical interventions within the last 2 months; * major surgery or major trauma within the previous 4 weeks; * recent puncture of an incompressible blood vessel (eg, subclavian or jugular vein); * severe liver disease, including liver failure, cirrhosis, portal hypertension (including esophageal varices) and active hepatitis; * confirmed gastric or duodenal ulcer within the last 3 months; * neoplasm with an increased risk of bleeding; * simultaneous administration of Dabigatran without prior administration of idarucizumab; * arterial aneurysms, developmental defects of arteries / veins; * acute pancreatitis; * bacterial endocarditis, pericarditis; * suspicion of aortic dissecting aneurysm; * any other conditions, in the opinion of the investigator, associated with a high risk of bleeding. * Lactation, pregnancy. * Known hypersensitivity to the non-immunogenic recombinant staphylokinase.
Where it's running
-
Belgorod Regional Clinical Hospital of St. Joseph
Belgorod, Russia Recruiting -
Kuzbass Cardiology center
Kemerovo, Russia Recruiting -
Center of Neurology and Cardiology
Kirov, Russia Recruiting -
Lipetsk City Hospital No. 4 "Lipetsk-Med"
Lipetsk, Russia Recruiting -
E.I. Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology
Moscow, Russia Recruiting -
F.I. Inozemtsev City Clinical Hospital
Moscow, Russia Recruiting
Show 8 more locations
-
Moscow Multidisciplinary Clinical Center "Kommunarka"
Moscow, Russia Recruiting -
S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital
Moscow, Russia Recruiting -
S.S. Yudin City Clinical Hospital
Moscow, Russia Recruiting -
N.A. Semashko Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital
Nizhny Novgorod, Russia Recruiting -
G.A. Zakharyin Clinical hospital №6
Penza, Russia Recruiting -
V.P. Polyakov Samara Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary
Samara, Russia Recruiting -
Tver Regional Clinical Hospital
Tver', Russia Recruiting -
City Clinical Hospital of Emergency medicine №25
Volgograd, Russia Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Sergey N. Tereschenko, MD, Prof. — E.I. Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology
- Study coordinator: Sergey N. Tereschenko, MD, Prof.
- Email: stereschenko@yandex.ru
- Phone: 495-150-44-19
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparing catheter-based treatments for acute pulmonary embolism
This registry compares outcomes of different catheter-based therapies to see which works best and is safest for people hospitalized with acute pulmonary embolism.
-
Early treatment for high-risk pulmonary embolism using catheters
This study tests if using a special catheter treatment right away, along with standard care, can help people with severe pulmonary embolism recover better and survive longer.
-
Registry of catheter interventions for pulmonary embolism
This study looks at how safe and effective different catheter treatments are for people with moderate to high-risk pulmonary embolism.
-
Heart@Home: Safe, at-home care for people with acute heart problems compared with hospital care
This trial tests whether hospital-level care at home can safely and effectively treat adults with acute heart conditions who would normally be in the hospital.
-
Pulsatile Electrical Impedance Tomography to Diagnose and Monitor Acute Pulmonary Embolism
This study tests whether bedside pulsatile electrical impedance tomography can help diagnose and track acute pulmonary embolism without radiation.
-
Vibrato Aspiration System for clot removal in acute pulmonary embolism
This study tests a vibrating aspiration device to help remove clots in adults with acute pulmonary embolism to see if it is safe and works in real patients.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.