Nasal High Flow vs NIV for early treatment of AE-COPD with high CO2
Official title: Nasal High Flow in Early Management of Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department for Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Hypercapnic Acidosis : a Randomized Controlled Non Inferiority Study
Run by University Hospital, Montpellier · NCT06114667 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether nasal high flow can match non-invasive ventilation for adults with an AE-COPD and high carbon dioxide levels treated in the emergency department.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 85 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 174 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University Hospital, Montpellier Academic / other |
| Locations | 3 sites (Montpellier, Montepllier and 2 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 16, 2026 |
| Main results expected | November 1, 2028 |
| Study ends | November 1, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | June 22, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06114667 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults admitted to the ED with AE-COPD and hypercapnic acidosis suitable for NIV, able to consent, and meeting the specified respiratory criteria.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who do not respond to the assigned ventilatory support or who have contraindications to either nasal high flow or NIV may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This multicenter, randomized, open-label study compares nasal high flow to non-invasive ventilation as early respiratory support for adults with AE-COPD and hypercapnic acidosis in the ED. Participants are assigned to receive either nasal high flow or NIV in 2-hour sessions with ongoing monitoring and serial blood gas testing to see if gas exchange and respiration normalize. Standard COPD care is provided per current guidelines, and follow-up occurs at 28 days via medical records and phone contact.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients may have a less burdensome breathing support option with similar symptom relief and gas normalization compared with NIV.
How similar studies have gone: Previous research has explored alternatives to NIV in hypercapnic COPD, but results vary and this direct head-to-head in the ED setting is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Adult Patient admitted to the ED for acute exacerbation of COPD (AE-COPD)and respiratory acidosis (PaCO2 \> 45 mmHg and pH \<7.35), for whom ventilatory assistance by NIV is indicated (SPLF 2017, GOLD2023 recommendations) Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with ability to understand and give an informed consent * Patients affiliated with or who benefit from a social security * Patients admitted to the emergency department for a clinical suspicion of AE-COPD based on clinical history, physical examination and chest X-ray (SPLF 2017) * Patients with acute respiratory failure defined by: Respiratory rate ≥ 25 bpm AND/OR Signs of respiratory failure (use of accessory respiratory muscles, paradoxical abdominal movement) * Patients with respiratory acidosis defined by PaCO2 \> 45 mmHg AND pH \< 7.35 (measured on arterial blood gas) Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who have already received NIV treatment before inclusion (including in-hospital or prehospital, with the exception of NIV at home) * Contraindication to non-invasive ventilation (SPLF 2017 and GOLD 2023 recommendations) * Patient uncooperative, agitated, opponent of the technique
Where it's running
-
Montpellier University Hospital
Montpellier, Montepllier, France Recruiting -
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nimes
Nîmes, France Not yet recruiting -
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers
Poitiers, France Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Mustapha Sebbane, MD, PhD — University Hospital, Montpellier
- Study coordinator: Mustapha Sebbane, MD, PhD
- Email: m-sebbane@chu-montpellier.fr
- Phone: +33 (4) 67 33 85 76
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
HFNC During Bronchoscopy for Respiratory Failure
This study tests whether using high-flow nasal oxygen during fiber-optic bronchoscopy is safe and helpful for patients with respiratory failure.
-
Interoception and Symptom Perception during Acute COPD Exacerbation
This study tests how people experience and interpret internal bodily signals during an acute COPD flare to see if interoception influences symptom perception.
-
Treating post-operative breathing failure with noninvasive mask ventilation versus high-velocity nasal oxygen
This trial will test whether noninvasive ventilation (a tight-fitting mask) or high-velocity nasal oxygen works better at preventing return to a breathing tube in adults who develop breathing failure within 48 hours after major surgery.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.