Multi-patient CT-derived Digital Twin Training to Shorten the Bronchoscopy Learning Curve
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial of Multi-Patient CT-Derived Digital Twin Anatomical Variability Training to Shorten the Clinical Learning Curve for Bronchoscopy
Run by China-Japan Friendship Hospital · NCT07718451 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests if training with digital twins from multiple CT scans helps novices learn bronchoscopy faster than standard anatomically uniform simulation training.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 110 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | China-Japan Friendship Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Beijing, Beijing Municipality) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 20, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 30, 2027 |
| Study ends | December 30, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | July 22, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07718451 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are residents or fellows in pulmonary medicine, critical care, thoracic surgery, anesthesiology, or related fields who have performed ≤5 bronchoscopies and have no prior formal bronchoscopy simulation training.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients may not benefit if the training method does not translate to improved performance in real procedures or if the learning curve is already minimal.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized trial compares two bronchoscopy training approaches for novices with ≤5 prior bronchoscopies and no formal simulation training. Participants are randomized to receive either multi-patient CT-derived digital twin anatomical variability training or conventional anatomically uniform simulation training, with equal training duration and supervision. The primary outcome is the early learning curve during the first 1-30 supervised real-patient bronchoscopies, measured by the OBAT technical-diagnostic subscore. Baseline assessments include prior experience, knowledge tests, confidence, and spatial ability. Post-training transfer tests use unseen CT-derived airway models to evaluate skills in a simulated-to-clinical transfer setting.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the approach could shorten the initial learning period for bronchoscopy, potentially improving safety and efficiency for new bronchoscopists.
How similar studies have gone: Prior simulation-based training studies have shown improvements with varied approaches; this digital-twin method explores a novel way to introduce realistic anatomical variability.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Trainee Participants: 1. Residents, fellows, or specialty trainees in pulmonary medicine, critical care medicine, thoracic surgery, anesthesiology, or related specialties whose training programs require flexible bronchoscopy training. 2. Previously performed ≤5 flexible bronchoscopies as primary operator. 3. No prior formal bronchoscopy simulation training course experience. 4. Able and willing to provide written informed consent and permit use of training logs, procedural videos, Ontario Bronchoscopy Assessment Tool (OBAT) scores, and clinical learning curve data for research purposes. Patient Participants: 1. Age ≥18 years. 2. Scheduled to undergo elective low-risk or low-to-moderate-risk diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy. 3. Clinically suitable for supervised novice-performed airway inspection, bronchoalveolar lavage, simple brushing, or other low-risk sampling procedures considered safe by the supervising bronchoscopist. 4. Able to understand and provide written informed consent and willing to complete pre-procedure anxiety and post-procedure experience questionnaires. Exclusion Criteria: Trainee Participants: 1. Previously performed \>5 flexible bronchoscopies or previously completed a structured bronchoscopy simulation training program. 2. Planned departure from the training program during the study period or anticipated inability to complete follow-up through at least clinical cases 1-30. 3. Unable to participate in simulation training or unwilling to permit procedural video recording. 4. Significant additional bronchoscopy training exposure outside the study protocol; such cases may not necessarily be excluded but will be documented and addressed in sensitivity analyses. Patient Participants: 1. Emergency bronchoscopy, intubated intensive care unit patients, severe hypoxemia, or significant hemodynamic instability. 2. Therapeutic bronchoscopy, complex central airway stenosis, high bleeding risk, procedures requiring advanced interventional techniques, or cases considered unsuitable for novice participation. 3. Complex sampling procedures such as EBUS-TBNA, transbronchial lung biopsy, or cryobiopsy will not be included in the primary endpoint case set and may be analyzed separately as exploratory subgroups or in future studies. 4. Refusal of trainee participation or refusal of procedural recording and/or questionnaire completion.
Where it's running
-
China-Japan Friendship Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Gang Hou, PhD
- Email: hougangcmu@163.com
- Phone: +86 13840065481
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
EpiFaith Syringe Learning Curve in Labor Epidurals
This study tests whether the EpiFaith syringe helps anesthesia residents learn to place labor epidurals faster with fewer attempts.
-
AI-driven autonomous registration for robotic bronchoscopy localization
This trial will test whether an AI system can automatically register and help guide robotic bronchoscopy for adults who need pulmonary nodule localization.
-
Shape-sensing robotic bronchoscopy to diagnose peripheral lung nodules
This tests a shape-sensing robotic bronchoscopy to see if it can get tissue samples from adults in Korea with peripheral lung nodules.
-
Predicting Difficult Awake Tracheal Intubation with Flexible Bronchoscopes
This study is testing a new way to predict if patients will have a hard time with awake tracheal intubation to help make the process safer for those with difficult airways.
-
Comparing two airway devices for anesthesia placement
This study tests which of two airway devices is easier for anesthesiology residents to learn to use when placing them in adult patients.
-
Two-on-one versus one-on-one virtual reality training for hip fracture surgery skills
This project will test whether two junior doctors sharing one instructor in virtual reality hip-fracture simulation teach first- and second-year orthopedic doctors as well as traditional one-on-one instruction.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.