Long-term follow-up of Nagor Perle smooth gel mammary implants
Official title: A Prospective, Multi-center, Observational, Non Comparative, Post-marketing Surveillance Study to Obtain Clinical Outcome Data on the Nagor PERLE Range of Silicone Breast Implants When Used in Breast Implantation
Run by GCA (Eurosilicone) · NCT06013514 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This project will follow adults who receive Nagor Perle smooth gel breast implants to see if they stay safe and work well over 10 years.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Sex | Women only |
| Enrollment | 60 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | GCA (Eurosilicone) Industry-sponsored |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Manchester) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 1, 2024 |
| Main results expected | September 2038 |
| Study ends | September 2038 |
| Registry record updated | June 29, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06013514 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Genetic female adults aged 18–65 who have received a Nagor PERLE implant for augmentation, reconstruction, or revision and can attend scheduled follow-up visits are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with excluded conditions such as certain autoimmune or wound‑healing disorders, a BMI above the protocol thresholds, or those unable to commit to long-term follow-up are unlikely to benefit from participation.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a prospective, non-comparative post-market observational follow-up collecting safety and performance data on Nagor Perle smooth gel mammary implants. Participants include adult genetic females receiving implants for primary augmentation, reconstruction after mastectomy (one- or two-stage, including prior radiotherapy and use of ADMs), or revision procedures. The protocol records complications with a focus on capsular contracture and implant rupture, plus other adverse events, with visits pre-operatively and at 12 months, then 3, 5, 8 and 10 years. Data will inform long-term device performance and regulatory post-market surveillance requirements.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the results could give patients and clinicians clearer long-term safety information about capsular contracture, rupture, and other implant-related risks.
How similar studies have gone: Other prospective post-market registries and cohorts of silicone gel breast implants have previously provided useful long-term safety data, although outcomes differ by device model.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Genetic female subjects aged ≥18 and ≤65 2. Subjects who underwent single or bilateral breast implantation with the study device for one of the following reasons:- i) Primary breast reconstruction following mastectomy (both for one-stage or two-stage surgeries, including patients with previous radiotherapy and who have ADMs of animal origin (bovine, porcine)). ii) Primary breast augmentation (cosmetic surgery) with or without mastopexy iii) Breast revision surgery with or without mastopexy c) Subjects who have received a Nagor PERLE implant. d) Subjects who have provided informed consent and can adhere to the requirements of follow up appointments as per the study protocol. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Subjects undergoing implant augmentation with a BMI \> 30 and undergoing reconstruction with a BMI \>32. 2. Subjects with autoimmune disease, lung fibrocystic disease, conditions that interfere with wound healing and blood clotting, a weakened immune system, reduced blood supply to the breast tissue or any other condition for which breast implants are contraindicated. 3. Subjects who have participated in a clinical study which involve chemical or drug study within 3 months prior to surgery, with the exception of subjects who are participating in breast cancer related clinical studies. 4. Subjects with insufficient tissue covering due to either radiation damage on the chest wall, tight thoracic skin grafts or radical resection of the pectoralis major muscle. 5. Subjects who have ADMs of synthetic origin. 6. Subjects who, in the Investigator's clinical opinion, have existing local or metastatic carcinoma of the breast that is unlikely to be fully excised at the time of insertion of the breast implant. 7. Subjects with known previous history of a sensitivity to silicone who, in the opinion of the Investigator, are unsuitable for surgery. 8. Subjects with an active infection who are unsuitable for surgery unless, in the opinion of the investigator, they are treated and cleared by the investigator. 9. Subjects with a history of abscesses anywhere in the body who, in the opinion of the Investigator, are unsuitable for surgery. 10. Subjects with a known history of compromised wound healing. 11. Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, have an existing condition that would compromise their participation and follow-up in this study. 12. Women who are pregnant and/or current breast feeders who do not stop breast feeding within 3 months of getting breast implants 13. Patients who have local recurrence or metastatic carcinoma at the time of insertion of breast implant
Where it's running
-
NHS Manchester
Manchester, United Kingdom Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Nabila Nasir, Dr
- Email: pals@mft.nhs.uk
- Phone: (0)161 276 868
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Breast implant study to see how Luna implants perform after surgery
This study tests whether Eurosilicone Luna breast implants stay intact and keep their shape over 10 years in women aged 18–65 undergoing cosmetic or reconstructive breast surgery.
-
Autologous Fat Grafting vs DIEP flap for reconstructed breast after radiation
This study tests whether autologous fat transfer can provide similar satisfaction and safety to the DIEP flap procedure for women needing breast reconstruction after mastectomy and radiation.
-
Nipple reconstruction with the FIXNip implant after mastectomy
This study tests a nipple reconstruction implant in women who previously had mastectomy for breast cancer and want nipple-areola reconstruction.
-
ESP Blocks to Help Pain After Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Flaps
This study tests whether erector spinae plane blocks can improve pain control after autologous free flap breast reconstruction in adults.
-
Improved Breast Enlargement Using Your Own Fat Tissue
This study tests a temporary device to help your own fat grafting for breast enlargement stay in place and keep volume after surgery.
-
EndoBreast: Feasibility and outcomes of nipple-sparing endoscopic mastectomy with immediate reconstruction
This observational study tests whether endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction is feasible and acceptable for women at risk or with breast cancer.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.