Italian pilot program to speed referral and care for cardiogenic shock patients
Official title: SPOKE-HUB SHOCK PROTOCOL MANAGEMENT ACCORDING TO SCAI CLASS IN TURIN AND MILAN AREA
Run by Fondazione GISE Onlus · NCT06475456 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This program will try a shared hub-and-spoke cardiogenic shock protocol to see if faster referral to specialized centers lowers 30-day deaths for adults with AMI-related cardiogenic shock (SCAI B–D).
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 786 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Fondazione GISE Onlus Academic / other |
| Locations | 16 sites (Chivasso and 15 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 1, 2024 |
| Main results expected | November 3, 2026 |
| Study ends | December 3, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | July 1, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06475456 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (≥18) with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (SCAI class B–D) who are admitted to participating spoke hospitals in the Turin and Milan areas are the intended participants.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients whose shock is not caused by AMI, those treated outside the participating centers' catchment areas, or those too unstable or ineligible for transfer or specialized interventions are less likely to benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a multicenter observational pilot using a hub-and-spoke model in the Turin and Milan metropolitan areas. It includes a retrospective cohort of anonymous electronic health record data from Jan 2016–Dec 2019 and a prospective cohort that will enroll consecutive AMI-related cardiogenic shock patients going forward, with a target of 384 patients per cohort (768 total). Four hub centers (each receiving patients from three spoke hospitals) and 12 spoke centers will share a dedicated cardiogenic shock protocol to improve communication and transfer timing. The main outcome is 30-day mortality after adoption of the protocol, with attention to timely use of pPCI and mechanical circulatory support at hub centers.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could reduce 30-day deaths and get more patients to specialized centers for treatments like pPCI and percutaneous mechanical circulatory support.
How similar studies have gone: Standardized shock-team protocols and hub-and-spoke referral systems have improved outcomes in other acute conditions like STEMI and stroke, and preliminary data suggest similar approaches can reduce mortality in cardiogenic shock.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: All subjects participating in this clinical trial must meet the following criteria: Prospective cohort * For conscious patients, signed and dated informed consent and consent to the processing of personal data * For unconscious patients, informed consent signed and dated by the legal representative, or a proxy or a relative. The consent will be presented to the patient as soon the health conditions will improve. Aging ≥18 CS will be defined as: 1. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) \<90 mmHg or mean arterial pressure (MAP) \<60 mmHg, after an appropriate fluid challenge if there is no sign of overt fluid overload, OR need of vasoactive agents to maintain SBP \> 90 mmHg or MAP \> 60 mmHg, OR need of MCS; 2. At least one of the following criteria/signs of overt hypoperfusion: mixed venous oxygen saturation \<60%; arterial lactates \> 2 mmol/L; oliguria \< 0.5 ml/Kg/h for at least 6 hours. 3. CS following an acute myocardial infarction (AMICS) or acute decompensation of heart failure (ADHF-CS) Exclusion Criteria: Patients will be excluded if any of the following conditions apply: 1. Cardiac arrest with no quantifiable or longer than 10 minutes "no-flow" time or with refractory cardiac arrest (as defined by CPR prolonging for more than 20') 2. Absolute contraindication to support devices. 3. CS due to other aetiology apart from the ones in inclusion criteria as well as SCAI A and E before device positioning. 4. Age greater than 75-year-old 5. Life expectancy \< 1 year due to other reason than cardiogenic shock.
Where it's running
-
Ospedale di Chivasso
Chivasso, Italy Recruiting -
ASL TO4 Ospedale di Ciriè
Cirié, Italy Recruiting -
Ospedale Pio XI di Desio
Desio, Italy Recruiting -
ASL Torino 4 Ospedale di Ivrea
Ivrea, Italy Recruiting -
ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
Milan, Italy Recruiting -
ASST Nord Milano
Milan, Italy Recruiting
Show 10 more locations
-
IRCCS San Raffaele
Milan, Italy Recruiting -
Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo
Milan, Italy Recruiting -
Ospedale San Paolo
Milan, Italy Recruiting -
ASL TO5 Ospedale Santa Croce
Moncalieri, Italy Recruiting -
Presidio Ospedaliero di Rho
Rho, Italy Recruiting -
Ospedale Civile SS. Annunziata
Savigliano, Italy Recruiting -
AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza
Torino, Italy Recruiting -
Azienda Sanitaria Locale "Città di Torino" Ospedale Maria Vittoria
Torino, Italy Recruiting -
San Giovanni Bosco, ASL Città di Torino
Turin, Italy Recruiting -
Ospedale di Vimercate
Vimercate, Italy Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Alaide Chieffo, Prof — IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital
- Study coordinator: Alaide Chieffo, Prof
- Email: cecalaide@gmail.com
- Phone: +390226437331
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Factors Influencing Outcomes in ECMO and Impella Patients
This study tests whether metabolic and thyroid hormone changes help predict survival for adults on ECMO or Impella at a single Hungarian cardiac ICU.
-
Evaluating a noninvasive tissue sensor to detect cardiogenic shock earlier in heart patients
This pilot, noninvasive study tests whether the NIRSense wearable can help detect deterioration in adults with cardiogenic shock risk due to heart attack or heart failure.
-
Safety and Efficacy of an Extracorporeal Ventricular Assist System for Cardiogenic Shock
This study tests whether an extracorporeal ventricular assist device can safely provide short-term heart support and help patients with cardiogenic shock or trouble weaning from bypass.
-
Left Ventricular Support and Advanced Monitoring in AMI–Cardiogenic Shock: Immediate Impella Use and PAC/Monitoring vs Standard Care
In adults with heart attack-related cardiogenic shock, this trial tests whether using an Impella left ventricular assist device and/or protocolized pulmonary artery catheter monitoring improves survival compared with standard care.
-
CRP Apheresis for infarct-related cardiogenic shock
This study tests whether selectively removing C-reactive protein with apheresis, in addition to standard care, helps people with cardiogenic shock after a heart attack.
-
Compare two ventilator modes in adults with cardiac ICU needs and invasive ventilation
This pilot tests whether volume-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation can be safely used in adults with heart disease and respiratory failure who need invasive ventilation.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.