Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of cervical disc surgery techniques
Official title: Economic Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Discectomy With Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy With Fusion in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease, a Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by Zuyderland Medisch Centrum · NCT04623593 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing which of two surgery options for neck pain from disc problems is more cost-effective and beneficial for patients.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 198 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Zuyderland Medisch Centrum Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Maastricht, Limburg) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 17, 2022 |
| Main results expected | June 1, 2026 |
| Study ends | June 1, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | January 25, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT04623593 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are adults aged 18 and older with single- or multilevel CDDD between C3 and C7 who exhibit symptoms of myelopathy or radiculopathy.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with a traumatic origin of compression, previous cervical spine surgery, or those requiring additional stabilization are unlikely to benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of two surgical techniques for treating cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD): anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA). The study will randomly assign patients with symptomatic CDDD to receive either ACDF or ACDA, assessing the long-term outcomes and costs associated with each technique. By comparing the incidence of adjacent segment pathology and overall healthcare costs, the trial seeks to provide clarity on the most economically viable surgical option for patients. The increasing prevalence of CDDD in the aging population underscores the importance of this evaluation.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to more cost-effective surgical options for patients suffering from cervical degenerative disc disease.
How similar studies have gone: While there is ongoing debate regarding the cost-effectiveness of these surgical techniques, this study aims to provide new insights, as no consensus currently exists.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Indication for anterior cervical decompression surgery. * Single- or multilevel CDDD between C3 and C7. * Symptoms of myelopathy, radiculopathy, or myeloradiculopathy. * In case of pure radiculopathy: refractory to at least 6 weeks of conservative therapy. * In case of myelopathy: symptomatic myelopathy. * Patients ≥ 18 years of age. Exclusion criteria * Indication for (additional) posterior surgical approach. * Indication for additional stabilization of the pathological segment by a plate. * Previous ventral surgery of the cervical spine. * Traumatic origin of the compression. * Previous radiotherapy of the cervical spine. * Metabolic bone disease. * Inflammatory spinal disease: e.g., Bechterew's disease, Forestier's disease. * Infection of the cervical spine.
Where it's running
-
Zuyderland Medical Center
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Anouk Smeets, MD, PhD, Professor — Maastricht University Medical Center
- Study coordinator: Valérie Schuermans, MD
- Email: valerie.schuermans@mumc.nl
- Phone: 0031433875001
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Gelified radiopaque ethanol for cervical disc herniation in routine care
This observational study looks at how patients with cervical disc herniation and chronic neck pain fare after treatment with Absolute Gel, used in standard clinical practice.
-
Identifying factors that improve neck pain after cervical spine surgery
This study looks at what factors can help people with neck pain feel better after having surgery to fix their cervical spine.
-
Using ZetaFuse Bone Graft to treat cervical disc disease
This study is testing if a new bone graft called ZetaFuse can help people with neck problems feel better and improve their nerve function after surgery.
-
Prophylactic foraminotomy to prevent C5 palsy after cervical spine surgery
This study tests if a specific surgical procedure can help prevent C5 palsy, which causes weakness in the arms, in patients having surgery for neck problems.
-
Effectiveness of deep cervical flexor training with or without scapular stabilization in cervical spondylosis
This study tests whether adding scapular stabilization to pressure biofeedback-assisted neck exercise improves pain, neck movement, and disability in people with cervical spondylosis.
-
Hard cervical collar after posterior cervical fusion
This trial tests whether wearing a hard cervical collar for 6 weeks after posterior cervical fusion helps patients with degenerative cervical spine disease.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.