Evaluating healing time effects on tooth extraction socket preservation
Official title: Influence of Healing Time on the Outcomes of Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Periodontally Compromised Extraction Sockets: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University · NCT06654141 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing if waiting 3 months or 6 months after a tooth extraction helps the area heal better before getting an implant, specifically for people with gum disease.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 42 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Shanghai) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 6, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 2027 |
| Study ends | December 2029 |
| Registry record updated | February 19, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06654141 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates include adults over 18 requiring molar extraction due to periodontal disease with specific radiographic findings.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with multiple adjacent tooth extractions or acute infections may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial aims to assess the impact of different healing durations (3 months vs. 6 months) on the outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation in extraction sockets affected by periodontal disease. Participants will undergo tooth extraction followed by grafting with Bio-Oss Collagen® and a collagen membrane, with evaluations conducted through histological, clinical, and radiographic methods. The study seeks to determine if a shorter healing time is viable for subsequent implant placement in molar sites.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved protocols for tooth extraction and implant placement, potentially reducing the waiting time for patients.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown varying outcomes in similar approaches, but this specific comparison of healing times is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * 18 years of age or older * ASA (American Society of Anesthesia) status I or II * Need for molar extraction due to periodontal disease with or without chronic endodontic involvement, complying with the presentation of periodontitis stage III/IV * Radiographic evidence of a bone dehiscence on at least one socket wall, where the height of the horizontal (suprabony) component of the defect (alveolar bone crest - cement-enamel junction) is \>50% of the corresponding root length as measured on CBCT scans prior to extraction (Ben Amara et al., 2021) * Radiographic evidence of at least 3 mm of residual bone wall height * Presence of at least one adjacent tooth to the extraction site * Treatment plan must include tooth replacement with an implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis Exclusion Criteria: * Extraction of multiple adjacent teeth * Acute infection associated with the tooth to be extracted or with adjacent teeth * Current smokers (\>10 cigarettes per day) * Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HbA1c \>7.0) * Any active oral or systemic acute infections * Currently receiving chemo- or radiotherapy or a history of radiotherapy in the head and neck area * Diseases or medications that may compromise normal wound healing
Where it's running
-
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital
Shanghai, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Xinbo Yu, BDS
- Email: xinboyu@proton.me
- Phone: 86+23271699
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Effect of four post-extraction socket approaches on preserving the ridge after tooth removal
This study tests four ways to care for an extraction socket to see which best preserves the jawbone and gum after tooth removal for future implants.
-
Immediate molar implants with customized healing abutments in different socket classes
This study tests placing an implant right after extracting a back tooth and using a custom healing cap to shape the gum from day one, in people needing posterior implants.
-
Use of enamel matrix derivative with immediate implants in the lower back teeth
This trial tests whether applying enamel matrix derivative at the time of immediate mandibular molar implants helps osseointegration and healing.
-
Soft tissue augmentation around dental implants using connective tissue graft or less invasive approaches
This trial tests three ways to increase the soft tissue around a dental implant in adults with thin gums to see which method works best.
-
Biodontoss and DWC dental implants and superstructures in adults needing tooth replacement
This PMCF study tests whether BIODENTOSS and DWC dental implants and their superstructures are safe and effective for adults with tooth loss over 24 months.
-
Temporary dental crowns and bridges using ON DENT materials
This PMCF study tests whether ON DENT temporary crowns and bridges perform safely and survive as patients wear them while awaiting final prostheses.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.