Evaluating early implantation of a heart pump in patients with severe heart issues
Official title: Evaluation of the Efficacy of Early Implantation of a Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock Compared to Conventional Therapy: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled and Open-label Clinical Trial
Run by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille · NCT05366452 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing if putting in a heart pump early can help people with severe heart problems from a heart attack feel better and live longer compared to just standard treatment.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 204 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Marseille, Bouche DU Rhone) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 19, 2022 |
| Main results expected | June 2026 |
| Study ends | December 2026 |
| Registry record updated | January 25, 2023 |
| Trial ID | NCT05366452 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 to 80 who are experiencing acute coronary syndrome with cardiogenic shock.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with significant femoral artery stenosis or other contraindications to the heart pump implantation may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial aims to assess the effectiveness of early implantation of the IMPELLA CP device in patients experiencing acute coronary syndrome complicated by cardiogenic shock, compared to standard medical therapy. It is a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial where participants will be assigned to either receive the heart pump in addition to optimal medical care or to receive only the standard treatment. The study will measure various outcomes, including mortality, need for advanced heart support, and quality of life over a one-year period. Patients will be monitored closely for complications and overall heart function throughout the trial.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could significantly improve survival rates and quality of life for patients suffering from severe heart failure due to cardiogenic shock.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown promising results with similar heart pump interventions in acute heart failure settings, suggesting potential for success in this trial.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age between 18 and 80 years old; * ACS ≤ 24 hours; * Cardiogenic shock defined by: * At least one criteria of low cardiac output defined by * SBP ≤ 90 mmHg or the need to use inotropes/vasopressors in order to obtain SBP\> 90 mmHg * CI ≤ 2.2L/min/m2 * At least one criteria of left overload defined by * clinical (killip class ≥ 2), * biological (NtproBNP \> 900pg/ml or BNP \> 400pg/ml), * radiological * non invasive or invasive hemodynamic evaluation * At least one criteria of malperfusion defined by * clinical (marbles, oliguria ≤ 0.5ml/min/kg, cold/clammy skin and extremities,..) * biological approach (arterial lactate ≥ 2mmol/L, ScVO2 \< 60%) * Stage C or D of the ACC classification of CS * Revascularization by PCI intended after coronary angiography; * Lack of significant femoral artery stenosis or other local contra-indication to a 14 Fr sheath; * Signed informed consent (patient and/or family/relative) or emergency procedure * Subject affiliated to or beneficiary of a social security system. Exclusion Criteria: * Persons referred in articles L.1121-5 to L.1121-8 and L.1122-2 of the Public Health Code: * Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding woman * Person deprived of liberty for judicial or administrative decision * Adult person under legal protection (any form of public guardianship) * Onset of shock \>24 hours * CS not related to ACS * Patient with prolonged cardiac arrest (\>5 mins) * Contra-indications to Impella CP implantations: * Isolated right ventricular failure * LV thrombus * Mechanical aortic valve or heart constrictive device * Aortic valve stenosis or calcification (equivalent to an orifice area of 0.6cm2 or less) * Moderate to severe aortic insufficiency (echocardiographic assessment graded as ≥ 2) * Severe peripheral arterial disease precluding placement of the Impella system * Combined cardiorespiratory failure * Presence of an Atrial or Ventricular Septal Defect (including post infarctus VSD) * Left ventricular rupture Cardiac tamponade * Mechanical complication of myocardial infarction * Cerebral deficit with fixed dilated pupils or irreversible neurological pathology * Anoxic brain injury * Active bleeding * Contra-indication to antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy * Life expectancy \< 1 year
Where it's running
-
Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille
Marseille, Bouche DU Rhone, France Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Laurent Bonello — Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
- Study coordinator: Laurent BONELLO
- Email: laurent.bonello@ap-hm.fr
- Phone: 4 91 96 86 83
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Factors Influencing Outcomes in ECMO and Impella Patients
This study tests whether metabolic and thyroid hormone changes help predict survival for adults on ECMO or Impella at a single Hungarian cardiac ICU.
-
Evaluating a noninvasive tissue sensor to detect cardiogenic shock earlier in heart patients
This pilot, noninvasive study tests whether the NIRSense wearable can help detect deterioration in adults with cardiogenic shock risk due to heart attack or heart failure.
-
Safety and Efficacy of an Extracorporeal Ventricular Assist System for Cardiogenic Shock
This study tests whether an extracorporeal ventricular assist device can safely provide short-term heart support and help patients with cardiogenic shock or trouble weaning from bypass.
-
Left Ventricular Support and Advanced Monitoring in AMI–Cardiogenic Shock: Immediate Impella Use and PAC/Monitoring vs Standard Care
In adults with heart attack-related cardiogenic shock, this trial tests whether using an Impella left ventricular assist device and/or protocolized pulmonary artery catheter monitoring improves survival compared with standard care.
-
CRP Apheresis for infarct-related cardiogenic shock
This study tests whether selectively removing C-reactive protein with apheresis, in addition to standard care, helps people with cardiogenic shock after a heart attack.
-
Compare two ventilator modes in adults with cardiac ICU needs and invasive ventilation
This pilot tests whether volume-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation can be safely used in adults with heart disease and respiratory failure who need invasive ventilation.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.